

SCOM and NinjaOne compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring category. SCOM seems to have the upper hand in Microsoft-centric environments, while NinjaOne is more user-friendly with a SaaS model.
Features: SCOM is ideal for Microsoft application monitoring, offering agent-based and agentless monitoring and customizable dashboards. It integrates well with the broader Microsoft suite, suiting entities deeply embedded in Microsoft ecosystems. NinjaOne focuses on user-friendliness and comprehensive device management through a SaaS model, making it suitable for smaller or mixed environments. It offers strong monitoring capabilities and seamless updates for remote management.
Room for Improvement: SCOM users face high costs and complexity, particularly in monitoring non-Microsoft systems. Users call for better dashboards, improved reporting, and more intuitive management pack deployment. NinjaOne users desire better reporting capabilities and more third-party software integrations. There is also room for more customization and reduced delays in its ticketing system.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM's on-premises deployment comes with challenges due to complexity, but benefits from Microsoft’s robust support. Hybrid deployment offers flexibility for enterprises using Microsoft ecosystems. NinjaOne's cloud-first approach simplifies deployment and is appealing for its scalability. Both products are praised for customer service, with SCOM benefiting from Microsoft's support and NinjaOne ensuring user satisfaction with a dedicated approach.
Pricing and ROI: SCOM's pricing is often bundled within Microsoft's System Center suite, which may be cost-effective for companies using multiple Microsoft components. NinjaOne offers a subscription-based model with competitive pricing and is considered affordable and flexible, especially suitable for smaller businesses with simpler cost structures. Both systems provide measurable ROI through infrastructure monitoring and reduced downtime.
```NinjaOne enables significant time savings, reducing my workload by 40% to 50%, primarily due to remote management capabilities.
Time-wise, it is probably saving the service desk a day a week.
We saved money because we were able to consolidate three different tools into one.
Our experience with escalation supports, including auto escalation to third-level or engineering support, has been very positive.
The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
Customer support from NinjaOne is excellent.
They often treat issues in isolation, not considering how one problem might relate to another.
When I was working directly with Microsoft at TCS, my first company, the support experience was quite smooth, and we received solutions promptly.
I would rate the scalability of NinjaOne as ten out of ten.
We easily install the agent on new servers and can create scripts to automate agent installation.
NinjaOne's scalability is brilliant, as we have gone from 2,000 devices to 3,500 devices.
The scalability of SCOM, meaning its ability to adapt to our needs, is excellent because we are working with SQL systems and multiple servers.
I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
In the two years I have used it, I have never experienced any downtime or reliability issues.
NinjaOne is extremely stable.
I have not seen many errors or frequent data loss because once we have installed the agent on the system and have the details, not much manual intervention is required.
SCOM is a bit unstable lately, primarily due to a lack of resources.
Security and reporting, including business intelligence tools, are adequate.
NinjaOne should consider adding notifications about script executions to email, Teams, or Slack channels.
The ability to have more than one NinjaOne agent on a device at a time, as this is a significant issue in our current state.
I would like to see a software-as-a-service version in Azure to eliminate the need for on-premise infrastructure.
SCOM is likely to be phased out in favor of more compatible tools like Icinga for application monitoring or when moving to cloud solutions like CloudWatch and Azure.
It would be beneficial to have a summary on one single dashboard, as there are many more possibilities available.
The pricing for NinjaOne is appropriate for small companies.
NinjaOne is reasonably priced, particularly with the inclusion of TeamViewer, SentinelOne, and Bitdefender.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.
The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses.
A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage.
Every month, every quarter, I see new features, and it is always evolving.
It assists me in detecting server downtime and delivers basic performance monitoring right out of the box.
The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool.
SCOM integrates several systems and offers correlation features, like setting up everything around Active Directory or DNS.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| NinjaOne | 1.1% |
| SCOM | 1.5% |
| Other | 97.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.
NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.
What are the most important features?
What benefits can users expect?
NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.
SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.
SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.
What are key features of SCOM?In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.