Checkmk vs NinjaOne comparison

Checkmk and NinjaOne are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while NinjaOne is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. Checkmk holds a 3.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to NinjaOne’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of NinjaOne users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,718 Views
2,669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Read 18 NinjaOne reviews

599 Views
286 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Checkmk

NinjaOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

NinjaOne and Checkmk are both leading IT management tools. While NinjaOne excels in support and user satisfaction, Checkmk is preferred for its robust features and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Features: NinjaOne offers remote monitoring and management, endpoint security, and automation. Checkmk provides detailed monitoring, scalability, and comprehensive dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Users of NinjaOne seek better reporting capabilities, enhanced integration options, and a more intuitive interface. Checkmk users seek improvements in setup complexity, a more intuitive interface, and better initial deployment experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NinjaOne scores high for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Checkmk has a steeper learning curve during setup but also offers efficient customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NinjaOne is considered cost-effective with a good ROI, appealing to smaller to mid-sized enterprises due to its pricing structure. Checkmk users find the setup cost higher but justify it with an impressive ROI owing to its extensive monitoring capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. NinjaOne

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

NinjaOne

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Ranking in Server Monitoring

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (20th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (2nd), Patch Management (9th), MSP Backup (3rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Enhances remote access and integration with third-party tools

I use NinjaOne for managing smaller clients, specifically their devices and software, for small to medium businesses. I provide remote management services through NinjaOne. It allows clients to use NinjaOne for remote access to their computers for home office purposes. This feature is highly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

More Checkmk pros

"The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."

"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."

"The most important aspect of this tool is the security it provides our company."

"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten."

More NinjaOne pros

Cons

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk cons

"There was a lot of delay with NinjaOne's ticketing system. For example, when a user creates a ticket and raises an issue, it would take 30 to 40 minutes to appear on the IT side. So the time delay issue is the main point."

"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne. It also didn't integrate with Trend Micro, which we were using previously. I would also like to have more control from the mobile app. As of now, I am able to see some performance values, but I can't see, for example, disk activity or disk performance values. If they can improve their app a little bit, it would help greatly. They can also improve the tech interface. If I assign certain techs to a bunch of specific machines, they only get those alerts that they're assigned to."

"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."

"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."

"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."

"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."

More NinjaOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"Its pricing is great."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about NinjaOne?

NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

The price or licensing of NinjaOne is a little bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

The network monitoring needs to be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 45% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

June 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

June 2025

Download NinjaOne product report

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

NinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, delivering visibility, security, and control over all endpoints for more than 20,000 customers.The NinjaOne automated endpoint management platform is proven to increase productivity, reduce security risk, and lower costs for IT teams and managed service providers. The company seamlessly integrates with a wide range of IT and security technologies. NinjaOne is obsessed with customer success and provides free and unlimited onboarding, training, and support. - Learn more here: https://www.ninjaone.com/

NinjaOne

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. NinjaOne

May 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. NinjaOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. NinjaOne and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. NinjaOne report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.