NinjaOne vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NinjaOne and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NinjaOne is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while Zenoss is ranked #64. NinjaOne holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NinjaOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

NinjaOne

Read 25 NinjaOne reviews

16,869 Views
4,049 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

6,879 Views
3,302 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and NinjaOne are two leading IT management solutions. NinjaOne seems to have the upper hand with favorable feedback on deployment simplicity and cost-effectiveness, while Zenoss Cloud excels in real-time monitoring and customer service.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers effective real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and extensive alerting capabilities. NinjaOne provides robust remote management, automation, and seamless integration with various third-party applications.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve incident response times, reduce overall complexity, and enhance user interface design. NinjaOne needs better reporting functionalities, a more intuitive design, and improved integration options for data analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud’s deployment requires significant time and expertise but is backed by highly rated customer service. NinjaOne offers a straightforward deployment process with impressive support, making it a quicker option for many organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud's pricing is perceived as premium, raising questions about its value for money despite a positive long-term ROI. NinjaOne provides cost-effective solutions with quick ROI realization, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (21st), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (4th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (7th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (3rd), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (5th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (2nd)

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (19th), Event Monitoring (14th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NinjaOne	1.0%
Zenoss Cloud	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good at managing updates and for remote support."

"NinjaOne allows even small teams of three users to support over 400 desktops and keep them up to date and working at peak performance."

"NinjaOne saves me time and improves my troubleshooting process by providing information automatically so I don't have to search for it."

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."

"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"It helps us to be able to have visibility into the overall performance of the servers, laptops, and desktops that we are managing currently."

More NinjaOne pros

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

"It's easy to use."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."

"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."

"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."

"The one feature that I believe needs improvement is the software patching."

"NinjaOne can be improved by making mobile usage on the system cheaper because it becomes an expensive commodity."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

"To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki."

More NinjaOne cons

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is great."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is managing machines over multiple networks and locations. For managing machines across those networks or locations, we have NinjaOne deployed on all our machines, and...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NinjaOne

Compared 2% of the time

Kaseya 365 vs NinjaOne

Compared 2% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 2% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

September 2026

Download NinjaOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

August 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

NinjaOne

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NinjaOne vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.