Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (17th), Workload Automation (22nd)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
OpenText Process Automation	1.1%
Other	97.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."

"The value of this solution is that it's easy to maintain, and to further develop."

"The solution in general is very easy to use, very user-friendly, and it has satisfied the requirements I have."

"It is a scalable product."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"Its enhanced usability makes it the best of the lot."

"As a Solutions Architect my role is to help my clients implement tools and technology that can build and automate their businesses."

"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"The stability has been perfect over the years; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, it's reliable, and the performance is good."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"Because Microsoft announced that they will stop supporting Nintex Process Platform and Nintex Process Platform stopped supporting it as well, I will never recommend Nintex Process Platform Workflows or Forms in the near future, but Nintex K2 can be an option."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"The UI for the solution is complex, and it would be better to go for Openpath and Angular or use another BPM engine."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"The integration could improve."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

What needs improvement with K2?

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

What is your primary use case for OpenText AppWorks?

We primarily use OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) for automating supply chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have our own product...

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Comparisons

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Nintex Process Platform

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

OpenText Process Automation

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

No data available

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation