Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.3, while OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.5. Nintex holds a 1.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

6,699 Views
4,086 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

2,559 Views
2,175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Process Automation compete in business process management. Nintex holds an advantage due to its ease of use and rapid deployment capabilities, especially appreciated in automation and user intuitiveness.

Features: Nintex Process Platform is noted for its user-friendly design, high integration capabilities, and fast performance. It offers comprehensive SharePoint integration and excels in workflow management. OpenText Process Automation is known for its BPM modules, superior monitoring capabilities, and integration with enterprise systems. Its low-code environment significantly aids in automating complex business processes such as supply chain management.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could improve its AI integration, simplify the user interface, and enhance error reporting and pricing flexibility. OpenText requires better integration models, improved mobile compatibility, and refined low-code capabilities to enhance user experience and adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers hybrid, public, and on-premises deployment options. It has well-rated customer service, emphasizing technical support and a 24/7 service model. OpenText also provides versatile deployment options with satisfactory customer service, though users seek more responsive technical support. Nintex’s approach to customer engagement and issue resolution is slightly more favored.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex's pricing tends to be higher than competitors but justified by its comprehensive features for mid-size enterprises looking for scalable solutions. Despite high costs, significant ROI through efficiency and time savings is reported. OpenText has mid-tier pricing but requires negotiation for optimal deals. Users experience quick ROI through automating complex workflows, despite initial investment and lack of a SaaS model.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), Workload Automation (22nd)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
OpenText Process Automation	1.1%
Other	97.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."

"From what was a 20 to 30-day approval cycle, it has now come down to between two and three days for approving loans and claims."

"It supports SharePoint in the platform, and it's easy to customize to the maximum extent."

"Scalability, good performance, and the K2 designer to create workflows/screens are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."

"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"The stability has been perfect over the years; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, it's reliable, and the performance is good."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit."

"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"The UI for the solution is complex, and it would be better to go for Openpath and Angular or use another BPM engine."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"The integration could improve."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The price is on the higher side."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText AppWorks?

We primarily use OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) for automating supply chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have our own product...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

July 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

July 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

No data available

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

August 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.