OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SAP users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

3,351 Views
3,183 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Read 3 SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (17th)

SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

NÃ

Nurhan Özcan

SAP PO Team Lead

Provides nice graphical representations but is lacking OData

My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation. You can see the process flow, lanes, pools, and flow objects, as well as details about tasks and activities. Thus, you can easily navigate through the process and check the progress on process execution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"The overall benefit I get from using this solution is developing in a more secure environment with distributed architecture and even distribution of work across resources where full control on the code and repository is required."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"If you are working in SAP projects, SAP BPM is a good fit."

"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."

Cons

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."

"It is not scalable."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"Business rules is not the most solid solution in the market, and the use of SAP Portal for some use cases could be a showstopper."

"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."

"I have encountered issues with stability of the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"It has a reasonable price."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Transportation Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

My project manager must be using the search capabilities of OpenText 360 for SharePoint, though I am not certain.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Agiloft Workflow and BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Red Hat Polymita Business Suite vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

IBM BPM vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

October 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2026

Download SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

NetWeaver BPM

Overview

OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration and document management by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Teams, strong file compatibility, and customizable workflows, supporting real-time access and automation.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides an efficient platform for document management and workflow automation through features like metadata retrieval and version control. It offers integration with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs, enhancing collaboration across industries. While users face challenges with licensing complexity and Office 365 integration, OpenText 360 plays a critical role in digitalizing documents and managing workflows. Despite its strong capabilities, improvements in pricing flexibility and support services are needed to elevate user experience.

What are the key features of OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Customization: Offers flexible workflows and approval processes.
Integration: Seamless with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs.
File Compatibility: Supports diverse file formats effortlessly.
Collaboration: Real-time document management and access.
Metadata Retrieval: Enhances document indexing and search.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved document management and workflow automation.
Security: Robust document retention and audit trail features.
Flexibility: Customizable workflows tailored to business needs.
Scalability: Supports high-volume document processing.
Automation: Simplified invoicing and operations through SAP APIs.

In industries like legal and utilities, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is implemented for its document management capabilities. It integrates with tools like Microsoft Teams to enable efficient workflows and digitalization processes, supporting enterprise document indexing and advanced search functions across sectors.

OpenText

SAP Netweaver BPM allows companies to design their process, deploy it, Identify the bottlenecks and finally optimize the process by removing these bottlenecks and hence increasing transparency, efficiency and maintainability.

SAP

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.