OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Parasoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

4,306 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

8,004 Views
4,002 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are competing products in the enterprise quality assurance market. Data comparisons indicate that Parasoft SOAtest has an edge in cost-efficiency and support, while OpenText excels with its comprehensive feature set, appealing to those who prioritize features over price.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest includes powerful API testing capabilities, service virtualization, and seamless API interaction, which allow effective service behavior simulation. OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers an extensive suite for web and mobile environments, real-time testing analytics, and advanced testing automation, catering to diverse testing needs.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its user interface to align with the latest UX best practices, improve its learning curve for new users, and expand its reporting functionalities. OpenText Functional Testing Lab could benefit from streamlined deployment processes, simplification of its extensive feature suite for ease of use, and reduction in complexity for its real-time analytics features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers straightforward deployment and robust support services for quick integration with existing workflows. OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides scalability for large enterprise environments, though its deployment can be complex. Its comprehensive customer support and resources offer detailed guidance, despite the associated learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest offers competitive pricing with a strong focus on ROI through efficient testing processes and cost-effective licensing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. OpenText Functional Testing Lab requires higher initial investment, yet its advanced features are justified for enterprises seeking powerful long-term solutions with significant returns in complex environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th), API Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.8%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	2.8%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	95.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The pricing is great."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing."

"It totally gives control to the end user to play with data and deploy the changes directly and that reflects in the application."

"As a test consultant, I have been able to deliver high quality automated testing solutions to our clients using SOAtest in a quick manner."

"It provides easy handling of RESTful APIs and figuring out exact API scalability, responses, and failed APIs, returning code captured by the fault injections."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"Customer Service: ExcellentTechnical Support: Very Good"

"Web services and API test automation was made simple without writing much code."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Yes, there were few issues, that caused the Memory out, but was resolved."

"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."

"In general, its user-friendliness needs a little improvement since there are a few bugs that still remain."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"The GUI should get a facelift to make it more user-friendly."

"More descriptive reports are needed."

"We have good support of our solution architect of Parasoft, but sometimes they don’t know all the answers and then it’s harder to find more knowledge in technical support from US teams, which slows things down."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

October 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

October 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

SOAtest

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.