OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5, while UiPath is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

3,108 Views
2,424 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,954 Views
2,972 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and UiPath Test Cloud are automated testing solutions, competing in the automated testing realm. UiPath Test Cloud holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value despite OpenText's competitive pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers cross-platform compatibility, scalability, and robust integration with security and IT tools. UiPath Test Cloud excels with advanced automation options, seamless enterprise integrations, and expanded test orchestration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its automation capabilities, integration with additional third-party apps, and user interface to improve user experience. UiPath might focus on making its premium features more accessible, increasing documentation for complex automation scenarios, and enhancing support services for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a straightforward setup process with strong support, focusing on specific environments. UiPath's cloud-based model offers rapid, scalable implementations, widely accessible to various businesses due to its simplicity and versatility, notwithstanding its solid support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers a cost-effective solution with a high ROI due to lower setup costs. UiPath Test Cloud, despite being pricier, justifies its cost with extensive features and scalable solutions, promising a higher long-term ROI, associated with its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.1%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.1%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	95.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The pricing is great."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"The document understanding is good."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

QA Wolf vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

July 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

July 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Test Suite

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.