OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

OpenText and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5, while Zeenyx is ranked #24. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

3,108 Views
2,424 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

2,484 Views
1,813 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and Zeenyx AscentialTest both compete in software testing solutions, with Zeenyx AscentialTest having the upper hand due to its advanced features.

Features: OpenText offers robust integration options for mobile and web testing, powerful tools for multi-platform testing, and application performance monitoring to assess user experiences. Zeenyx provides a snapshot series feature for unique object identification, drag-and-drop test building, and an Add and Bind parameter feature for reusable steps and data creation.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface flexibility and real-time analytics integration while optimizing the cost-effectiveness of advanced features. Zeenyx could improve ease of use for beginners, enhance documentation and community support, and offer more seamless integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText delivers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support resources, enabling easy on-premises or cloud integration. Zeenyx ensures a user-friendly setup and reliable technical assistance, providing a better customer experience overall.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers competitive pricing with satisfactory ROI over time. Although Zeenyx incurs higher initial costs, its extensive features result in significant ROI by enhancing efficiency and productivity, justifying the initial outlay.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 2.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Zeenyx AscentialTest	2.0%
Other	96.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is great."

"The product is easy to use."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

"Our web site is dynamically generated to each user, so much so that the only testing solution we found was AscentialTest."

"Productivity increased by almost 10 times after using AT for test automation as manually it was taking almost a day or three days (sometimes a week) effort to do data verification of expected and actual excel files with huge number of columns and rows (approximately 50 columns and thousands of rows)."

"Great support, powerful tool, easy enough for entry-level staff to use."

"As a platform corporation a primary strategic goal is to develop coherent tests across platforms, and this is where Ascential Test shines."

"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with, and I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months, even without taking their training."

"It's been really easy to automate the same applications TestComplete struggled with."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest pros

Cons

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"The product can be improved a little bit with regards to the UI as the panels are too many."

"It would be great if AscentialTest supported the license server being in the cloud."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

"We did observe that aborting the test run of a test set in the middle of execution was taking a long time."

"The product does have limitations on how certain project files are locked (checked-out)."

"It would be better if the support for Web Tables and Siebel Tables are readily available and made more simpler as they are encountered quite often while automating the apps."

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

12%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

July 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

July 2026

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

AscentialTest

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a powerful test automation solution providing features such as object recognition and drag-and-drop interfaces to streamline the test creation process across multiple environments.

Zeenyx AscentialTest supports automation processes across WPF, web, and Electron technologies. It offers object recognition with snapshot technology and reusable steps, simplifying test creation and management. Its compatibility with SVN, JIRA, and Jenkins facilitates CI/CD integration. Especially beneficial for PowerBuilder applications, it enhances efficiency with robust data handling features. Although it could improve navigation and UI design, suggested additions such as cloud-based licenses and debugger integration are promising.

What are AscentialTest's key features?

Object recognition: Simplifies test creation with snapshot technology.
Drag and drop interface: Facilitates ease of use and saves time.
Reusable steps and TestSet: Enhances test efficiency and management.
Integration: Supports continuous integration with tools like SVN, JIRA, and Jenkins.
PowerBuilder support: Streamlines testing in complex environments.
Form control recognition: Aids in dynamic web testing.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating AscentialTest?

Time efficiency: Through simplified test creation and maintenance.
Improved integration: Facilitates seamless testing processes within CI/CD frameworks.
Data handling: Enhanced accuracy in testing through advanced data management capabilities.
Cross-platform support: Effectively handles WPF, web, and Electron technologies.

In industries requiring robust testing for dynamic environments, Zeenyx AscentialTest is implemented for data-driven testing and large dataset analysis. Its multi-database support eases the verification process, unifying objects, steps, and test frameworks. Integration from test database installation to automated report generation ensures efficient workflows.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.