OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #25. OpenText holds a 9.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

6,736 Views
4,304 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

898 Views
531 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the software testing category. Based on features and compatibility, OpenText UFT One holds an advantage due to its broader testing capabilities across various applications and platforms, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite specializes in Oracle environments.

Features: OpenText UFT One offers extensive compatibility with various applications, including GUI testing and API testing. It supports numerous technologies and provides high-end automation frameworks. Oracle Application Testing Suite provides robust functional and load testing, especially for Oracle applications, with a detailed interface and performance testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One users point to its resource-heavy nature and the need for better CI/CD integration. Some find it sluggish at times and costly. Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in desktop application automation, setup simplicity, and browser compatibility, particularly for recent browser versions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One can be deployed both on-premises and in private clouds, requiring significant initial setup. Mixed customer service reviews highlight response time issues. Oracle Application Testing Suite is often on-premises with hybrid cloud options, receiving favorable customer service feedback, especially for Oracle-centric setups, though technical support could be more efficient.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is considered expensive, with various licensing options impacting budgets. Its ROI is often realized through increased efficiency in testing. Oracle Application Testing Suite offers competitive pricing, particularly when bundled with other Oracle solutions, providing good ROI for Oracle-focused enterprises through effective automation with minimal costs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (3rd)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.9%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes."

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."

"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."

"The stop automation is a great feature."

"UFT is very strongly built. It's widely used, so there's a lot of support."

"The initial setup is relatively easy."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"The solution is scalable."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"UFT still requires some coding."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"Previously, the product was a script-based solution. Presently, the tool offers non-script, no-code, or low-code functionalities, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."

"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"The price is reasonable."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The tool's price is high."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 35% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 11% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

OATS

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.