Oracle Access Manager vs WSO2 Identity Server comparison

The compared Oracle and WSO2 solutions aren't in the same category. Oracle is ranked #9 in AM , with an average rating of 9.3, and holds a 2.0% mindshare in the category. WSO2 is ranked #10 in CIaA , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,300 Views
1,209 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

WSO2 Identity Server

Read 11 WSO2 Identity Server reviews

1,333 Views
573 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

WSO2 Identity Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and WSO2 Identity Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server Report (Updated: March 2020).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server

March 2020

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (9th)

WSO2 Identity Server

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Oracle Access Manager is designed for Access Management and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, down 2.1% compared to last year.
WSO2 Identity Server, on the other hand, focuses on Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM), holds 3.0% mindshare, up 2.6% since last year.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Access Manager	2.0%
Microsoft Entra ID	15.1%
Okta Platform	10.8%
Other	72.1%

Access Management

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WSO2 Identity Server	3.0%
Okta Platform	15.5%
Auth0 Platform	14.1%
Other	67.4%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Utilizing key management and seamless single sign-on integration for enhanced user profile management

WSO2 Identity Server's key management feature stands out as a particularly impactful feature for enhancing security. Additionally, from a user perspective, the self-user portal and user profile management capabilities are highly valuable. It allows users to manage their profiles, change passwords, and offers a self-care portal type of functionality. The single sign-on capability integrates seamlessly with various platforms, including Google, Facebook, LDAP, and Active Directory, which supports rapid product launches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Overall, I rate Oracle Access Manager nine out of ten for its extensive capabilities."

"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"The solution is able to save time and resources for my clients."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

"The product supports customization."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"Comprehensive ecosystem."

"It's very easy to implement everything."

"I am completely satisfied with WSO2 Identity Server and would definitely recommend it to other companies."

"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."

"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."

"The solution gets the job done, and we don't have to do the main configuration."

"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."

"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."

More WSO2 Identity Server pros

Cons

"Customer Service: Poor. The EBS Access Gate support was delivered as a patch and support was not able to solve various problems, which I believe to be attributes to more current versions of OAM and WebLogic not being backwards compatible with the documented solution."

"The technical support is not very good at all."

"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"Technical Support: Bad, when we have problems Oracle Support doesn't fix it."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"There are problems with stability."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"The solution's licensing model could be more flexible, and pricing could be improved."

"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."

"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."

"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."

"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."

"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."

"The solution seems to be pretty outdated."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More WSO2 Identity Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"The tool is affordable."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"The product is a little expensive."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"They should bring in some good pricing models to host the marketplace."

"I rate the product price an eight out of ten. There is a need to pay more for the extra features provided by the solution."

"At this time we are working with the open-source version."

"We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers."

"WSO2 Identity Server is not an expensive solution."

"I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

10%

Transportation Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Identity Server?

The pricing is currently the same as the API Manager, so it's not surprising. Since we used it primarily for SSO and the self portal, there were no additional pricing concerns.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Identity Server?

Currently, all required features are supported. If new use cases for artificial intelligence arise, it could be beneficial to incorporate those. However, for our current projects, WSO2 Identity Ser...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 Identity Server?

We deployed WSO2 Identity Server to fulfill our single sign-on (SSO) requirements. Whenever we implement the API Manager, instead of using the API Manager's inbuilt key manager, we use WSO2 Identit...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 12% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 25% of the time

Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 23% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 8% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 4% of the time

More WSO2 Identity Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Identity Server

February 2026

Download WSO2 Identity Server product report

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

WSO2

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server

March 2020

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.