No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle CRM vs Pega Customer Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle CRM
Ranking in CRM
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Automation (8th)
Pega Customer Service
Ranking in CRM
28th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
AI Customer Support (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Oracle CRM is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega Customer Service is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle CRM1.2%
Pega Customer Service0.5%
Other98.3%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Patrick Ernsten - PeerSpot reviewer
Biz Opd Esd Strategist At Broadcom Inc. at Broadcom Inc.
CRM has supported contract tracking and customer insight while reporting remains secondary
I use Oracle software internally. I'm also selling project management software, automation software, and network operation software within the company to our customers. The Oracle solutions I use include making quotes with CPQ, making Oracle engagement clouds, and a little bit of CRM system functionality. I'm not the owner of it. I'm only using it to have admin access for my customers here. I'm not involved with any decision on what we're using at Broadcom for Oracle. We did a certain type of adoption in Oracle. We made a certain object for it, and that works pretty well. The only thing is that customizing and making extra fields takes a little bit of a long time. However, if you do customize it, it works out well for that part.
Kishore-Panathula - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Architect-CLSA at Wipro Limited
Unified customer service has provided real-time insights and supports flexible, intuitive workflows
We have a customer service application for customer service in a smaller group, and for most purposes, we use the direct platform. It is a unified channel that depends upon the business. We do not use all channels, but we leverage them wherever they are applicable. The interface is intuitive and depends upon the business. Whenever there is a request for information, we come up with a design and then provide the opportunity to see if it is usable or if they would prefer it in another fashion. Out of the box, it is acceptable. It has all the features required for supporting the customer service side. Although we are not using the voice feature, it gives people the flexibility to interact and get real information. Real-time information is available. It includes both a dashboard and the customer service front desk UI.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For the most part, the solution is straightforward."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle CRM is the organization it provides."
"We are able to take back control of our client sales information and analyze it for the future to improve."
"It is one of the most proficient CRM tools out there; it is comprehensive and scalable, and it covers most of the CRM activities, business lines, and business requirements."
"Oracle CRM is a stable solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"Technical support is very fast. It's customer friendly."
"The technical support provided for all the solutions from Pega is of the same quality since they have their own internal teams and the same mechanisms, which are good for dealing with issues of different users."
"Pega Customer Service is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is case management and different configurations."
"It has all the features required for supporting the customer service side, and although we are not using the voice feature, it gives people the flexibility to interact and get real information with real-time information available."
"The product is scalable. It works efficiently for changing existing features."
 

Cons

"Oracle CRM should improve in terms of AI capabilities and user interface design."
"The performance could be better. It has sometimes taken far too long to complete a single task."
"This solution is only available on-premises. It could be improved by offering a cloud/SaaS option which is more scalable."
"Customization is an area in the solution that takes too much time. So, it needs to be improved."
"The product is not intuitive."
"The product's UI lags, and with all the new technologies, it is not quick enough to adopt them."
"The solution's mobile app needs to be enriched with more functionalities in the future."
"The initial setup was quite complex in the beginning, and once it was done, it was quite difficult to manage."
"The product's pricing needs improvement."
"The licensing cost could also be improved."
"Pega JVM function needs to be improved."
"Improvements are always required, but at this moment, the UI is the key area that is not flexible enough for us."
"The only concern I have seen about the product is its prices."
"Integrating with non-Pega systems (e.g., legacy CRMs, third-party APIs) can require significant effort and custom development."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Shifting from traditional licensing and monthly maintenance fees to a subscription-based, pay-as-you-use model offers several advantages. This approach only charges me for my transactions, aligning costs with business performance. As my company grows, the software provider's revenue grows proportionally to the increased usage. The cost and suitability of Oracle CRM depend on factors like location, industry, and compliance needs. It may be more common for US companies to use Oracle CRM and European ones to use SAP."
"Compared to alternative solutions Oracle CRM is expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"The licensing is on a yearly basis."
"The costing for this solution is very high. It targets top tier companies. This solution can be split up into multiple modules to cater to the low tier customers."
"We have annual licenses to use this solution that are quite expensive. For example, we have approximately four types of licenses and we have one annual contract for the number of licenses we use for Oracle CRM and the loyalty system."
"There is a license required to use this solution. The price is reasonable for a CRM."
"It is not cheap. It is more suitable for big companies."
"The tool's pricing is flexible, and I rate it four to five out of ten."
"The solution provides licenses to users either based on the number of users or the number of cases that an end user creates."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Construction Company
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle CRM?
I'm not a big fan of the reporting functionality, but I do appreciate some of the functionalities and connections with each other. Reporting is really bad. Reporting is not good, so we use a lot of...
What is your primary use case for Oracle CRM?
My main use case for Oracle CRM is to check contracts, checking renewal information, so contract-wise, commercial-wise, device information, and also customer contact information and product adoptio...
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle CRM?
I'm actually mainly working with the knowledge internally. Most of it is still on reporting. For me, to set up a meeting is no problem. For the marketing efforts, we're using HubSpot right now. I w...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pega Customer Service?
The setup cost depends upon the business. We do not use all channels, so it depends, but we leverage them wherever they are applicable.
What needs improvement with Pega Customer Service?
Improvements are always required, but at this moment, the UI is the key area that is not flexible enough for us. From the implementation side, it is still at the higher end. However, I do not have ...
What advice do you have for others considering Pega Customer Service?
The organization uses internal applications. The overall review rating for this solution is nine out of ten.
 

Also Known As

Market2Lead
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Turk Telekom, yoo Ltd , Mobilitec, Sanipex Group, ec4u expert consulting AG, Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Lawn Tennis Association, Geodis, Freedom Technology
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle CRM vs. Pega Customer Service and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.