Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] vs Workspace ONE Intelligence comparison

Quest Software and Omnissa are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 86% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Omnissa users who would recommend it.

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Read 22 Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Read 3 Workspace ONE Intelligence reviews

712 Views
691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] and Workspace ONE Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (46th), Mobile APM (5th)

Featured Reviews

Anton Kasimov

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Drill-down monitoring shows us the entire transaction chain, from the front end to back end. It needs HTML5 interface.

I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace. If you try to compare SaaS and on-premise Foglight versions you can see differences in UI-design. It's my subjective experiences, but SaaS version looks more modern. Hope this helps

Read full review

Manjeet Nishad

Sr. Technical Specialist & Team lead at Wysetek Systems Technologists Pvt. Ltd.

Automation and custom reporting impress while support resolution needs improvement

Workspace ONE Intelligence comes under a separate cost if you purchase UEM, making it a useful tool. The current features available in Workspace ONE Intelligence meet all use cases, so there isn't currently a need for improvement. Support could be improved for Workspace, especially the technical part, and it needs to ensure that issues can be resolved within one or two days. The main issue is the time to resolve problems, not the time to response, which is adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

"Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur."

"Having standard monitoring features and a central repository saves us a lot of time and reduces risk of incidents."

"FxV is valuable as we can playback the session."

"Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable."

"With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session."

"It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers."

"Infrastructure Monitoring and End User Monitoring are the product’s most valuable features to me."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] pros

"Integration is also very easy."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its tunneling capability. It is good for inventory, encryption, device location, and kiosk mode. If a device is lost, you can find it. We integrated it with a third-party tool for one-time passwords and two-factor authentication. The user-friendly interface makes device management easy."

"I would rate Workspace ONE Intelligence nine out of ten."

Cons

"The version compatibility needs work."

"I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace."

"It needs a more intuitive way to create and implement custom "Cartridges" to be deployed through out a Federated environment."

"There are some metrics I'd like to track that are difficult to find or implement into a tracking solution without a lot of manual work."

"We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

"They need to improve the stability of FxM and FxV."

"I want to see mobile access application in the next release."

"My only complaint from Foglight for monitoring is that you only get a plot for five minute average for metrics like CPU and Memory, on the application side I can see metrics more quickly at 15 seconds for metrics like active sessions, heap. I would like to see the same for CPU and memory."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] cons

"One area for improvement is location mapping - it uses Bing Maps instead of Google Maps, which isn't always up to date. Device enrollment can also be challenging, especially for older devices that need a factory reset."

"Windows devices management needs improvement."

"Support could be improved for Workspace, especially the technical part, and it needs to ensure that issues can be resolved within one or two days."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"The price is expensive for us."

"The solution is cost-effective. Workspace ONE Intelligence is neither cheap nor expensive. Compared to other tools like MaaS360, it Is more cost-effective. It costs about seven dollars per user, while others might cost $50—a big difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Workspace ONE Intelligence comes under a separate cost when purchasing UEM. There is price sensitivity in India compared to other solutions currently occupying the AirWatch, so pricing needs to be ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workspace ONE Intelligence?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Predictive analysis hasn't been used, as there have been no customer use cases requiring it. Workspace ONE Intelligence offers flexibility in configuration, requiring only UEM integration if data n...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 66% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 34% of the time

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Competitors

New Relic vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 24% of the time

Dynatrace vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 21% of the time

POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 15% of the time

Cavisson NetDiagnostics vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 12% of the time

More Workspace ONE Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Workspace ONE Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Foglight, Dell Foglight

Apteligent, Crittercism

Overview

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.

Quest Software

Get insights, guidelines, and preferred outcomes that will help you deliver the best possible mobile experience for your customers and help make your mobile business successful like never before.

When milliseconds can cost you millions, Apteligent reveals operational and usage trends, uncovers issues, and analyzes behaviors. This allows you to continuously improve apps, keep users happy, and put your mobile business at the top of its game.

Omnissa

Sample Customers

Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com

AT&T, Bloomberg, CNN, Experian, Fox, JC Penny, Urban Outfitters, Nokia, Lutron, NASCAR, T-Mobile, Urban Engines, Microsoft, Lego

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.