Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Quest Software are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 162 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

16,078 Views
14,309 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Read 22 Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Container Monitoring (8th)

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Eduardo Gallardo

Director of Technical Part at NOS SGPS

Dashboards facilitate prompt alerts but discovery feature needs enhancement

I would recommend Broadcom DX Application Performance Management if a customer doesn't have any existing performance solution. However, ten years ago, the solution was better, and now there are many competitive options. My overall rating would be between six and seven. The product rating I would give is 6.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Anton Kasimov

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Drill-down monitoring shows us the entire transaction chain, from the front end to back end. It needs HTML5 interface.

I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace. If you try to compare SaaS and on-premise Foglight versions you can see differences in UI-design. It's my subjective experiences, but SaaS version looks more modern. Hope this helps

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to accomplish the identification of the root cause of problems with applications in drill-down level by integrating the suite with tools for managing and monitoring."

"The ability to deep dive into the root cause of any given issue has always been the most valuable feature."

"SLAs and User Experience improved (most of all- User Experience / Application performance) You can fix complex incidents with a quick look at the dashboards (CA dashboards or your custom dashboards) You can easily be proactive and can help to save departments a lot of time."

"These tools help us identify the issue quickly, and that saves us a tremendous amount of money."

"It gives us insight into the functional health of the application, if we have any hot spots."

"Now, different teams can get info even before the system crashes and can take proactive steps and find the exact point to focus their efforts to fix it."

"Scalable, stable, and easy to deploy APM tool which effectively monitors code-level visibility."

"Technical support has been pretty good."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

"Our ROI has been great it has saved us many times to resolve issues before customers started complaining."

"It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers."

"Foglight is an awesome tool and it is able to instrument and integrate easily with any monitoring tool."

"The extensive monitoring tools embedded in Foglight are a real asset."

"Over all in my organization, this product helped us to maintain health, risk and efficiency of the virtual infrastructure."

"With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session."

"Foglight is the best overall solution we use, but it doesn't do everything we need or doesn't provide the best solution to everything we want to monitor."

"Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] pros

Cons

"There are a lot of improvements to be done."

"Since Broadcom bought it, I would no longer recommend this product to other users."

"The scalability is very poor; when you expand your application, you have to do it manually on the deployment."

"A CA APM agent takes a lot of memory. That is one disadvantage. If you configure CA APM correctly it will still consume around 15 to 20 percent of memory."

"User interface - CA is moving towards HTML5, but still a lot is Java, old fashioned, non-customizable and not user friendly. It’s look and feel is still too technical."

"The CEM (Customer Experience Management) product is still immature and do have hiccups."

"Yes, we encountered issues with scalability inside Team Center, a massive amount of universes, perspectives, applications."

"Our users lag how to identify the root cause with this solution."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

"The “cartridge” concept for every little thing is a bit of a bother to implement."

"I recall that the lay-out was rather dull when I used this particular version of Foglight."

"The price is expensive for us."

"In an older version of Foglight, we were not able to get any of our custom agents to work properly so that feature was not as much use as we had initially hoped and haven't tried using since."

"My only complaint from Foglight for monitoring is that you only get a plot for five minute average for metrics like CPU and Memory, on the application side I can see metrics more quickly at 15 seconds for metrics like active sessions, heap. I would like to see the same for CPU and memory."

"The upgrade process could use some fine tuning. I have done an upgrade of the system as well as addedupdated agents, and sometimes that process is a bit cumbersome, and does not go as planned."

"There are some metrics I'd like to track that are difficult to find or implement into a tracking solution without a lot of manual work."

"We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Broadcom is a better and cheaper option from the financial perspective. It also depends on the DLP plug."

"There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example."

"Negotiate a lot, but do not forget to buy the product because it is worth it."

"Pricing and licensing are not issues."

"I'm unable to give information on Broadcom DX Application Performance Management licensing costs, but all Application Performance Management products have expensive pricing. This means that it's not only Broadcom that's expensive, and it would be an advantage if the cost would be a little bit cheaper."

"The license for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is annual. The licensing model could improve because there is not any limit to deploying the agent, there should be some limits on it."

"Dynatrace is the most expensive of these tools followed by AppDynamics which is "medium-expensive." CA APM is a bit lower in price than either Dynatrace or AppDynanics... In my opinion, if you can afford it, go for AppDynamics instead of CA APM."

"On pricing, CA is very competitive. I think that's going to help in the long run."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"The price is expensive for us."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

17%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	122

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The initial pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions. The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The first area for improvement is the discovery feature, which should be enhanced to collect comprehensive information from applications and services. This includes using agents or scripts to gathe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Our primary use case involves having a large dashboard with significant information for alerts, alarms, and metrics to summarize the state of critical businesses and applications. When an issue ari...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Dynatrace vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

October 2026

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

Foglight, Dell Foglight

Overview

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers proactive alerting, transaction tracing, and root cause analysis. It enhances end-user experience management through efficient dashboards and customizable reporting, extending monitoring over Java and .NET applications.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management delivers comprehensive monitoring and performance insights across cloud and Java applications. It proactively addresses issues with tools like Introscope for rapid error identification and Customer Experience Manager for end-user management. The software's dashboards consolidate performance data in real-time, helping organizations enhance debugging and incident management. Its low overhead and integration with service tools make it well-suited for production environments. However, it faces potential improvements in areas such as UI updates, agent management, automation, and seamless integration with new technologies.

What are the standout features?

Proactive Alerting: Identifies issues before they impact users.
Deep-Dive Transaction Tracing: Offers comprehensive tracking of transactions for detailed analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Expedites problem-solving by pinpointing issues quickly.
Introscope: Facilitates rapid error detection and resolution.
Customer Experience Manager: Enhances management of user experiences effectively.
Real-Time Insights: Provides immediate views of performance data through interactive dashboards.
Customizable Reporting: Offers tailored report options for specific business needs.
Java and .NET Monitoring: Supports a range of applications, enhancing troubleshooting efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Issue Resolution Speed: Quick problem identification reduces downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances application efficiency, reducing costs.
Cost Reduction: Improves resource use and operational costs.
Dashboard Efficiency: Real-time, consolidated data offers transparency.

Organizations in logistics, banking, and e-commerce implement Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to monitor performance across crucial environments. Their usage involves enhancing performance, debugging, and proactive incident management for cloud and Java apps, with management dashboards supporting greater transparency in crash analytics and server health checks, ultimately improving user experience.

Broadcom

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.