Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Broadcom and Quest Software are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 162 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

8,736 Views
7,775 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Read 22 Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Container Monitoring (7th)

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Eduardo Gallardo

Director of Technical Part at NOS SGPS

Dashboards facilitate prompt alerts but discovery feature needs enhancement

I would recommend Broadcom DX Application Performance Management if a customer doesn't have any existing performance solution. However, ten years ago, the solution was better, and now there are many competitive options. My overall rating would be between six and seven. The product rating I would give is 6.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Anton Kasimov

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Drill-down monitoring shows us the entire transaction chain, from the front end to back end. It needs HTML5 interface.

I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace. If you try to compare SaaS and on-premise Foglight versions you can see differences in UI-design. It's my subjective experiences, but SaaS version looks more modern. Hope this helps

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"EPA provides more flexibility for meeting customer requirements."

"With the adoption of CA APM, we have accurate mapping, we're updated on what supports each business service and what, when, where an incident occurs and how it affects the business."

"A client claims that they have had better management and administration along with advanced reporting capabilities to the Privacy Authorities of State."

"It is very useful and helpful with the analysis of historical performance data."

"The solution is very stable."

"The insight it gives into the applications that it's actually applied to, and the flexibility to do many things with those metrics, and also feed your own metrics from external sources."

"The compatibility of the solution is its most valuable aspect."

"If there's something that you really need to get at that doesn't come out of the box, you can pretty easily put together some custom metrics and get those in place."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

"Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive."

"It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers."

"The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

"We have no hard figures on the ROI on this product, however having the system has saved us time in terms of debugging and getting to the root cause of issues."

"The extensive monitoring tools embedded in Foglight are a real asset."

"FxV is valuable as we can playback the session."

"Many other tools are capable, but IMO not as flexible or powerful except for particular applications."

"The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] pros

Cons

"As such, no improvement after using CA APM."

"Broadcom DX Application Performance Management could improve its supportability to the current technologies and the end-to-end correlation feature should be done automatically without custom configurations. Additionally, there should not be any configuration changes to the client-side when deploying the solution."

"Since Broadcom bought it, I would no longer recommend this product to other users."

"The product displays some graphics and sometimes we want to have some different metrics in the same graphic but it doesn't display in the same scale, so it's quite complicated to see the metrics. If the product would be able to manage a double scale, it would be perfect."

"From my perspective, as I had the opportunity to evaluate CA APM compared to other vendors, one of the improvements we highlighted which would be necessary to improve the targeting interface is to make it more user-friendly and current."

"User interface - CA is moving towards HTML5, but still a lot is Java, old fashioned, non-customizable and not user friendly. It’s look and feel is still too technical."

"Application performance in terms of transactions is a bit slow and could be quicker."

"The technical support is very poor."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

"We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

"Being able to incorporate other bespoke monitoring into Foglight would have made the tool even more useful."

"I recall that the lay-out was rather dull when I used this particular version of Foglight."

"In an older version of Foglight, we were not able to get any of our custom agents to work properly so that feature was not as much use as we had initially hoped and haven't tried using since."

"I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace."

"We had issues with deployment in the beginning until we had an expert guide us through the process."

"I would perhaps like to see more SSMS connections."

"I think installation and setup needs little more improvement especially when you are installing with external database."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing and licensing are not issues."

"Depends on the size of the product you need."

"It is definitely expensive for what we get, but there isn't an alternate option at the moment."

"Dynatrace is the most expensive of these tools followed by AppDynamics which is "medium-expensive." CA APM is a bit lower in price than either Dynatrace or AppDynanics... In my opinion, if you can afford it, go for AppDynamics instead of CA APM."

"Setup costs are quite competitive relative to other solutions, and simpler."

"Broadcom is a better and cheaper option from the financial perspective. It also depends on the DLP plug."

"There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example."

"The licensing costs are expensive."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"The price is expensive for us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	124

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The initial pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions. The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The first area for improvement is the discovery feature, which should be enhanced to collect comprehensive information from applications and services. This includes using agents or scripts to gathe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Our primary use case involves having a large dashboard with significant information for alerts, alarms, and metrics to summarize the state of critical businesses and applications. When an issue ari...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Dynatrace vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

June 2026

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2026

Download Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

Foglight, Dell Foglight

Overview

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers proactive alerting, transaction tracing, and root cause analysis. It enhances end-user experience management through efficient dashboards and customizable reporting, extending monitoring over Java and .NET applications.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management delivers comprehensive monitoring and performance insights across cloud and Java applications. It proactively addresses issues with tools like Introscope for rapid error identification and Customer Experience Manager for end-user management. The software's dashboards consolidate performance data in real-time, helping organizations enhance debugging and incident management. Its low overhead and integration with service tools make it well-suited for production environments. However, it faces potential improvements in areas such as UI updates, agent management, automation, and seamless integration with new technologies.

What are the standout features?

Proactive Alerting: Identifies issues before they impact users.
Deep-Dive Transaction Tracing: Offers comprehensive tracking of transactions for detailed analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Expedites problem-solving by pinpointing issues quickly.
Introscope: Facilitates rapid error detection and resolution.
Customer Experience Manager: Enhances management of user experiences effectively.
Real-Time Insights: Provides immediate views of performance data through interactive dashboards.
Customizable Reporting: Offers tailored report options for specific business needs.
Java and .NET Monitoring: Supports a range of applications, enhancing troubleshooting efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Issue Resolution Speed: Quick problem identification reduces downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances application efficiency, reducing costs.
Cost Reduction: Improves resource use and operational costs.
Dashboard Efficiency: Real-time, consolidated data offers transparency.

Organizations in logistics, banking, and e-commerce implement Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to monitor performance across crucial environments. Their usage involves enhancing performance, debugging, and proactive incident management for cloud and Java apps, with management dashboards supporting greater transparency in crash analytics and server health checks, ultimately improving user experience.

Broadcom

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.