Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required."

"We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that."

"You can geofence yourself if there is an incoming attack or a continuous ping from a company outside your country."

"The most valuable feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the SD-WAN gateway."

"Its portal is user-friendly. I am able to manage the user data and access control through this device."

"Web application filtering eases internet access control."

"The reporting features are very good."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features."

"I don't know whether this will be included in an upgrade, but I would like to get the user utility, like seeing where the users are using more of the data."

"VPN configuration is not very swift."

"There is a lot or room for improvement, because it is still not a fourth or fifth generation firewall. It lacks security features."

"Needs a mail alert/notification when the device loses any of its connections, during ISP redundancy implementation."

"They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance."

"The technical support response time could be faster."

"The implementation policy needs improvment."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM needs cheaper pricing."

"The solution comes with a yearly licensing fee."

"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."

"Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually."

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco."

"The solution’s pricing is average. The product is worth the money."

"The prices of the product can be considered quite steep...My company makes yearly payments towards the licensing cost attached to the product to our ISP."

"The product is reasonably priced."