Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"The VPN is excellent on the solution."

"I find Sophos Cyberoam UTM very good. I like the feature of being able to block off Mac IDs that host users. For example, you have a Mac or Windows laptop and you created a hotspot. Other devices like mobiles and tablets e.g. iPads connected to that hotspot. We can block those devices that connected to the hotspot we created, only through Sophos. It's a good feature we didn't find in other UTMs."

"The performance has been good overall."

"Good user interface."

"Technical support is excellent."

"I'm more inclined towards the conventional firewall. So for me, I'm more geared towards the standard firewall type functionalities as well as the web application firewall because that seems to work fine."

"The most valuable features are the firewall section, the VPN, and how you control live users."

"In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The VPN is an area that can be improved."

"What needs improvement in Sophos Cyberoam UTM is openness in the competition among Sophos partners or any other Sophos product. Another area for improvement in the solution is pricing. It could be cheaper."

"They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance."

"Cyberoam configuration is done through the browser, which is one of the places that viruses spread."

"The technical support response time could be faster."

"I would like to see improvements in the development of reports. The process needs to be made simple."

"The product is at its end-of-life. There is nothing to improve as it will be discontinued."

"The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM has many price schemes."

"It is not cheap."

"I consider Sophos Cyberoam UTM to be a competitively-priced product."

"We just use the standard package."

"It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a cost-efficient solution compared to other solutions."

"Separate license keys are required for different solutions that we implement in the server room, which are an additional cost."

"Licensing is very good value for the money."