Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sophos Cyberoam UTM based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, WatchGuard Firebox, and Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW).
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Sophos Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sophos, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM excels in identity-based policy creation and is cost-effective for smaller businesses. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate delivers a vast feature set and integrated SD-WAN functionality, appealing to enterprises seeking robust threat protection despite higher initial costs.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM attracts enterprises with its identity-based security and user visibility features but may face scaling issues. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers simplicity and versatility, appealing to tech buyers with its effective cloud deployment options and cost-effective pricing models.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM incurs a lower setup cost, providing an economical choice, while WatchGuard Firebox demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a disparity in pricing between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM incurs a lower setup cost, providing an economical choice, while WatchGuard Firebox demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a disparity in pricing between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers ease of use and cost-effectiveness, ideal for small to medium businesses prioritizing user identity-based security. In comparison, Check Point Quantum Force provides advanced threat prevention and centralized management, appealing to large enterprises seeking robust security and willing to invest.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM emphasizes identity-based security with detailed user control and robust on-site features, appealing to those needing granular management. In comparison, Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud management with ease of administration, attracting buyers focusing on remote management efficiency.
Juniper SRX offers robust features like high availability and deep packet inspection, ideal for enterprise environments. In comparison, Sophos Cyberoam UTM provides user identification-based security and threat protection. SRX may appeal to enterprises seeking performance, while Cyberoam suits small to medium businesses with budget constraints.
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has lower setup costs compared to Sophos Cyberoam UTM, which involves higher initial expenses. This significant cost difference may influence preferences for businesses with budget constraints.
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has lower setup costs compared to Sophos Cyberoam UTM, which involves higher initial expenses. This significant cost difference may influence preferences for businesses with budget constraints.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM targets smaller enterprises with efficient AD integration, web controls, and simplified management. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard Network Security offers scalable threat prevention for larger enterprises, focusing on integration across cloud environments. Both offer unique strengths catering to different business needs.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard Network Security, which demands a higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs highlights the financial commitment each solution entails.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard Network Security, which demands a higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs highlights the financial commitment each solution entails.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers comprehensive security solutions with its advanced threat protection and strong integration capabilities, ideal for complex network needs. In comparison, KerioControl is favored for its ease of use and robust VPN and firewall functions, appealing to SMBs for straightforward management.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM has lower setup costs compared to KerioControl, allowing businesses to implement firewall protection without significant expense. Conversely, KerioControl, although more costly to set up, provides robust security features justifying its higher initial investment.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM has lower setup costs compared to KerioControl, allowing businesses to implement firewall protection without significant expense. Conversely, KerioControl, although more costly to set up, provides robust security features justifying its higher initial investment.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers comprehensive security with identity-based policy creation, ideal for enterprises needing robust solutions despite higher costs. In comparison, Untangle NG Firewall's modular approach and affordability appeal to budget-conscious users, although scalability and device-based pricing can be constraints for larger organizations.
A one-stop solution for all enterprise security needs. With the UTM appliance as your first line of defense, your network is secure and your employees can focus solely on productivity and business impact.
