UiPath Test Cloud vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

UiPath and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. UiPath holds a 2.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to SmartBear’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of UiPath users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,321 Views
605 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Zephyr Enterprise

Read 9 Zephyr Enterprise reviews

1,590 Views
1,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Zephyr Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between UiPath Test Cloud and Zephyr Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Management Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Zephyr Enterprise

Ranking in Test Management Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zephyr Enterprise is 5.2%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.3%
Zephyr Enterprise	5.2%
Other	92.5%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Integration with tool streamlines test management but needs better exporting options

I use it for test management within Jira This tool boasts an incredibly user-friendly interface that integrates seamlessly with other Jira tools. I particularly appreciate its intuitive features for designing test plans, creating test cases, and executing test cycles. Some areas for improvement,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration, which was particularly useful for my use case, allowing me to connect APIs seamlessly within the defined workflows in UiPath."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

"We use the solution for test case management."

"The solution does its job well."

"At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements."

"It has integration with test automation tools."

"Now, we are getting consolidated reports in one place, we have all our metrics and repository together, and this is helpful."

"It's very simple to use, which is beneficial, and it has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."

"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."

"It has a very intuitive user experience."

More Zephyr Enterprise pros

Cons

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

"We are looking for advanced support with integration to CI tools. This is something which Zephyr does not have today."

"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."

"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

"It's difficult to export the test cases in Zephyr, especially with screenshots or attachments, making sharing test cases not very easy."

"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."

"For JIRA, in comparison to other solutions, such as TestRail, Zephyr is good, but it is not as good as DFS."

"Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting."

More Zephyr Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

"It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."

"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?

Some areas for improvement, include its export capabilities. Exporting test cases, especially those with screenshots or attachments, can be cumbersome, hindering easy sharing and scalability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?

I use it for test management within Jira.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Zephyr Enterprise?

I would recommend it mainly for manual testing and test management. Within Zephyrscale, they also have automated testing, however, I would recommend it only for test management. The overall rating ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

TestRail vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Test Ops vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Zephyr Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Download Zephyr Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Test Suite

SmartBear Zephyr

Overview

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Zephyr Enterprise is known for its flexible design, enabling easy linkages and quick updates accessible to everyone. Supporting multiple users, it offers test management solutions for web and mobile testing, integrating smoothly with other Jira tools.

Recognized for its lightweight configuration, Zephyr Enterprise allows for efficient test execution planning and report generation. The interface is intuitive, integrating seamlessly with other Jira tools for effective test plan design and execution. Users, drawn to its automation capabilities, leverage it for both web and mobile testing environments. However, areas such as test case version tracking, report variety, and export processes require improvement. Enhancements in security and test repository management are also noted. Primarily used for diverse test management methodologies, the transition from waterfall to agile frameworks presents challenges, yet integration with automation tools and Jira remains a strong use case.

What are the most important features?

Lightweight Design: Enables easy modifications and accessibility for all users.
Multi-user Support: Facilitates simultaneous user access with a global perspective.
Automation Integration: Essential for both web and mobile testing environments.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports with an emphasis on simplicity.
Jira Integration: Seamless interaction with Jira tools enhances test planning.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Efficient Test Management: Supports agile and waterfall methodologies with ease.
Improved Accessibility: Multiple users can view updates and modifications efficiently.
Cost-effective Integration: Works well with existing automation frameworks, reducing costs.
Streamlined Processes: Simplifies sales and customer verification processes.

In specific industries, Zephyr Enterprise is instrumental for test management in sales and customer verification. While initially tailored for waterfall projects, its adoption in agile frameworks, coupled with Jira and automation tools, supports continuous integration practices. This adaptability makes it a viable option across multiple sectors with cost considerations prompting some to use alternative tools like DFS for specialized projects.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Free Report: UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our UiPath Test Cloud vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.