No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] vs Veritas Backup Exec comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Veeam Agent for Microsoft W...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas Backup Exec
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (26th)
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Ibtehaj - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Pre-Sales Manager at Arcana Info
Easy to use and mange with reasonable pricing
The main feature is a specific file type. If we want some PDF files just to back up, the prefix is very easy, and we do everything in Veeam backup. It's straightforward to set up. It's stable. The solution is easy to use. You can centrally manage it. It's potentially free to use.
VijayPandey - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales System Engineer at Eden Infosol Pvt Ltd
Ease of deployment and excellent support ensures seamless data security
I am working with Veritas Backup Exec, and that is the one I use. The value of using Veritas Backup Exec across physical and virtual environments is significant. I had a chance to use Veritas Backup Exec on physical and virtual environments, but not on the cloud. The benefits from the platform support of Veritas Backup Exec are that it works very nicely for physical and virtual environments. Veritas Backup Exec is affordable for my customers. My customers use the solution on-premises and in virtualization. Securing the data for customers is obviously a significant benefit of Veritas Backup Exec. I highly recommend using Veritas Backup Exec for backup as it is very easy to use, easy to deploy, and the support is also very nice. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Veritas Backup Exec a 9.5.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
"A full-featured option for managing virtual machines with an instant recovery feature."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and stability of the product."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and stability of the product, and the technical support is also very good."
"The stability is good, the solution offers good performance, there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it's reliable and we haven't had any problems with it at all so far."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It was very easy. Deployment only took about one hour with configuration and everything considered."
"The solution is meeting all of our client's requirements. It has good performance."
"The solution is good for small and medium-sized businesses."
"Compression is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is good for physical backups."
"All data sources are covered by a backup process which is very stable and fast, and a big advantage is that it can backup direct to tape."
"It is very useful to be able to backup files and folders, for both Windows and Linux (physical and virtual servers), and put them into whatever kind of storage that you desire."
"The automation, backup, database backup, and SQL module are valuable features."
"The usability and interface of the solution are good."
"I recommend Veritas Backup Exec to those who want to use it, as the application management is quite simple and the GUI is very straightforward and easy to understand for administrative purposes."
 

Cons

"An area that this solution could be improved would be with the licensing."
"An area that this solution could be improved would be with the licensing."
"There really are no cons. The product simply has to maintain development to keep up with changes in the operating system."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows should improve by having more features, easier deployment, and compatibility with Unix boxes."
"We went from a 30 second RTO to a 2-3 hour RTO."
"With the currency exchange, the solution ends up being quite expensive."
"In terms of improvements, they can maybe improve its documentation."
"A lower price would always be beneficial."
"The support from Veritas Backup Exec could improve. The support we receive is offsite, and at times when we have an issue, the person helping may be in a different time zone."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"Something within the software itself isn't quite right. There may be a bug or glitch."
"The reports could be made in an easier way."
"They can improve the reporting component. The reports aren't user-friendly at all. You have to download them to Excel to get statistics."
"However, for large environments such as Oracle, SAP HANA, Microsoft Exchange, DB2 and the VM backups, you can go for Veritas NetBackup, EMC Legato NetWorker, Simpana Commvault and Tivoli Store Manager (TSM)."
"This solution does not support image-level backup of a physical server."
"The solution could improve by having better documentation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for its licenses is reasonable and as per industry standards."
"The pricing model is based on CPU and must be declared as Microsoft or VMware licensing."
"We have a license package."
"The solution is inexpensive, more so than other products."
"We are on an annual license to use Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows. There are not any additional fees to use the solution."
"There are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees, and pricing can be a disadvantage or a weakness for this solution."
"We pay for a three-year subscription to use Veeam Agent."
"Pricing is based on license packaging and duration. Longer term licenses are less per year and license packages also offer a discount."
"It's a good price for the product."
"I think it's sold at the right price. It's not expensive. The license is usually for a year."
"Depending on the scenario, it can cost less than half of the price of other methods."
"The solution costs $700 per agent and is expensive compared to other products that offer better stability."
"Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology."
"We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
"I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten."
"I rate the price of Veritas Backup Exec a four out of five."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Photography Company
16%
Performing Arts
14%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do the backup solutions of Veeam and Veritas compare?
Technically, Veeam is best for hyper-v & VMWare replications, snapshots, HA failover, also support for file system backups inside VMs., support for tape library & FC too. But Veritas Netbac...
What needs improvement with Veritas Backup Exec?
I am not the right person to mention what has to be improved in Veritas Backup Exec as I think they are working very well for the application. The licensing remains the same in Veritas Backup Exec....
 

Also Known As

No data available
Backup Exec, Symantec Backup Exec
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ContinuitySA, Landmark Information Group
Beta Offshore
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: May 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.