Top 10 Forcepoint ONE Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

14 reviews
100% willing to recommend

406 followers

Top Forcepoint ONE Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Forcepoint ONE based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Internet Access. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Forcepoint ONE surpasses its competitors by offering seamless cloud-native security solutions with advanced threat protection, adaptive access control, and data visibility across all cloud applications, ensuring businesses robust protection and efficient operational scalability.

Forcepoint Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Forcepoint, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella excels in rapid deployment and economic pricing, attracting buyers focused on efficiency. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE, with higher setup costs, offers advanced threat analytics for buyers prioritizing comprehensive data security. Cisco's swift setup contrasts with Forcepoint's thorough configuration requirements, emphasizing respective deployment preferences.

Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Forcepoint ONE Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is lower and straightforward, while Forcepoint ONE requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is lower and straightforward, while Forcepoint ONE requires a higher initial investment.

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access offers robust threat prevention and scalable cloud-based security with superior integration and compliance. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE features customizable controls and application-centric solutions for comprehensive data protection with flexible deployment, appealing to tech buyers valuing integration and data control.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically features a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly alternative.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically features a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly alternative.

Zscaler Internet Access

4.1 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access

4.1 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access delivers flexible cloud-based security and efficient threat prevention, appealing to cost-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE provides sophisticated data protection and integration with endpoint security, attracting industries needing stringent data security despite a higher investment.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making Zscaler a higher-end option in terms of upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making Zscaler a higher-end option in terms of upfront expenses.

Lookout

3.6 out of 5

Lookout

3.6 out of 5

Lookout excels in threat detection and mobile security with ease of integration and competitive pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection and cloud security features, appealing to businesses prioritizing robust security and advanced capabilities over initial costs.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. Lookout Report

Pricing

Lookout has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, making it a less economical initial option, while Forcepoint ONE offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Cloudflare One is favored for cost-effective scalability and rapid deployment. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced security features and comprehensive guidance during setup. While Cloudflare One attracts budget-focused clients, Forcepoint ONE appeals to those needing robust, long-term security investment.

Download Cloudflare One vs. Forcepoint ONE Report

Pricing

Cloudflare One offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Forcepoint ONE requires a more substantial investment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare One offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Forcepoint ONE requires a more substantial investment upfront.

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss offers effective threat detection and customizable security policies. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE stands out with advanced threat protection and data loss prevention. Buyers may choose iboss for cost-effective solutions or opt for Forcepoint ONE for extensive features and smoother deployment.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. iboss Report

Pricing

iboss involves higher setup costs compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The difference in pricing underscores the diverse strategy each company employs in introducing their services to new clients.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers cost-effective pricing and simplified deployment, ideal for businesses seeking swift integration. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE delivers advanced features and security controls, attracting buyers investing in comprehensive protections and complex configurations with strong post-deployment support.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Forcepoint ONE Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Forcepoint ONE presents an economical setup option, providing a cost-effective initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security offers competitive pricing with strong integration, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and ease of use. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE provides extensive security features and scalability, making it attractive for buyers focused on comprehensive and customizable security solutions.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. Skyhigh Security Report

Pricing

Skyhigh Security has a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which may influence budget considerations when choosing a security solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Skyhigh Security has a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which may influence budget considerations when choosing a security solution.

Fortinet FortiGate SWG

4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate SWG

4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate SWG provides effective pricing and strong customer support through comprehensive security controls and hardware-centric strengths. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers robust cloud-native features and flexible remote access, appealing to those valuing innovative technology over lower costs.

Download Forcepoint ONE vs. Fortinet FortiGate SWG Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate SWG offers a more cost-effective setup with fewer complexities, while Forcepoint ONE incurs higher initial costs but provides robust security features, highlighting a trade-off between cost efficiency and advanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP APM excels in network access control and identity management with flexible deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection within a robust cloud-based architecture, facilitating straightforward deployment and responsive support, justifying its premium pricing and comprehensive ROI.

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Forcepoint ONE Report

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.

Show 3 more products

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)