Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Reviews

FortiAnalyzer is a log analytics tool. Our company has around 600 to 700 people.

FortiAnalyzer helps us discover what's happening on the network.

They could always improve the interface and the user experience.

I have used FortiAnalyzer for four or five years.

I rate FortiAnalyzer eight out of 10 for stability.

Scalability is irrelevant to me because we have a small setup. One analyzer is enough for me.

Setting up FortiAnalyzer isn't complex and takes two or three hours. They have a prebuilt OVA we can deploy using Ansible. Next, we configure FortiGate to send the logs to the FortiAnalyzer. You can also download premade reports on the portal.

You pay an annual license based on the volume of logs per day.

I rate FortiAnalyzer seven out of 10.

Most of our clients are banking and financial institutions, so their data doesn't go to the cloud as such. Their data is on-premises only. Some of our clients can go to the cloud to save the price and do management, administration, and so on, but then most of our clients, use on-premises FortiAnalyzer.

Fortianalyzer helped us to manage fortigate devices and update them from central location.

I have found incident management and also identifying new threats, analyzing the network traffic, and finding out the issues with the network traffic such as any security issues to be valuable. I also like the compliance reports.

It is a very stable and scalable solution.

One thing we struggled with FortiAnalyzer was integration with SIEM. We also had issues with the new threats and APTs. There were false positives, so we needed to have some ratings related to false positives.

It is easy to set up is you have FortiGate firewalls. We tried setting up with other devices, and I don't think it supports other firewalls or other devices. If it did, then it would have been great because we would have been able to use FortiAnalyzer for hybrid environments with different OEM firewalls.

If we can have an intelligent analysis system which will detect false positives and detect the exact problem, it would be great.  If FortiAnalyzer can integrate with FortiSIEM and give us threat reports, that will also help because then I won't need to have another tool or another dashboard which I need to look out for.

I've been using it for four years.

It is a very stable product, and we have had no issues at all.

It is easy to scale; there are no challenges.

The technical support is good. Most of the time, when we escalate the tickets the second line of support, FortiGate support, has been very good. The first line might take up time, but the second line of support resolves the case quite quickly.

Yes we used checkpoint for our organisation , but it was a complex system to manage, we expect a firewall to be a simple device to avoid complexity.

The initial setup is quite simple with FortiGate devices. So, if you have FortiGate firewalls, it is quite easy to set up. Once Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is configured, then the only thing we need to do is to monitor it.

When you compare with other firewall vendors, FortiAnalyzer is quite competitive in pricing. They are very aggressive as well.

Yes we did evaluate paloa alto , but it went into backburner due cost factor.

If you have critical objects to protect or critical data to protect, then you should go for FortiAnalyzer.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Fortinet FortiAnalyzer at eight.

Most importantly, it is for the administration of Forti fabric devices and reporting of Forti fabric, and being able to generate reports. It's for logging. All 40 fabric devices are able to send logs to FortiAnalyzer. Basically, the use cases are for administration, reporting, and logging.

Logging is the best feature. 

I like how everything is integrated with the FortiGate devices, FortiAuthenticator, and other fabric devices. You're able to see all the login details for the administration of FortiGate. It offers great user connectivity using that Fortinet embodiment of the user. It gives you all those login information details.

It's easy to set up.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well. 

It's very user-friendly.

The fact that it only works with FortiGate devices is quite unfair. We would like to do the reporting, logging, and administration of all the public devices and all the IoT devices. We wish to add the switches, and routers from different vendors, so it's not a vendor-specific diagnostic solution.

I've been using the solution for four years now. 

The product is 100% stable. I haven't found any issues with FortiAnalyzer. It's reliable.

Depending on the licenses you procure, the number of devices, and the storage space that you have, to be able to attain those logs and reports, the solution can scale. 

Support is great. Usually, when you call on them, they are right on time, and they'll be able to assign an engineer for remote session support.

Positive

Setting the solution up is pretty easy. It's just a matter of integrating with the Fortinet public devices. FortiGate will start sending logs and then reports to FortiAnalyzer.

Once it is set up, the solution is easy to maintain.

I'm not sure about the exact licensing costs.

I'm working with the latest version of the solution. 

We've done on-premises and cloud deployments. 

Usually, clients who don't have SIEM or Nag solutions find FortiAnalyzer quite effective as it's going to give them identification of the user activity reports on different IO devices and the usage of devices. It gives you visibility of your entire infrastructure.

I'd recommend the solution. It's very user-friendly.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We are using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for the managing surface for our customers. We are a service provider and we are focusing on providing a service to our customers.

The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is its performance.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could improve the user interface, and the experience of users receiving the reports and tracking could be better.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for approximately three years.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is stable.

The support from Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is good.

The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is fine. There is a lot of browsing and a lot of hierarchy that you need to have a particularly good understanding of in order to track the right things that you want to select.

There is a license needed to use this solution.

My advice to others is they have to assess well what kind of specific function or what kind of solution they are looking for.

I recommend this solution to others, but it depends on their usage.

I rate Fortinet FortiAnalyzer a seven out of ten.

Our customers are working with this product in their companies.

I haven't really played around with it so much. Basically, we're just doing log reviews, and that's it.

The initial setup is easy.

It's a very stable product.

We can scale the product as well. 

Support has been good in general. 

It offers pretty good documentation.

I like the interface they offer. 

I'm a reseller and integrator.

I can't really tell if anything is missing. Maybe we'll find something in the future, however, I'm not sure at the moment.

Their pricing model is not the best and needs work. 

It would be nice if there were more third-party integration capabilities. 

I've been using the solution for six months. It hasn't been that long. 

Like all Fortinet products, it is pretty stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable and expandable. It's not an issue at all. 

We have three people working on it in our organization. 

Technical support is fairly good. I haven't really needed to call support just yet.

Our company is a Fortinet supplier. We don't deal with other solutions. 

It's an easy initial setup. The implementation is not overly complex. The deployment is pretty fast and only takes two or three hours. 

I'm not a fan of the licensing system in general. I don't like their pricing model. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We have the most data visibility with this solution.

The user interface could be a bit more user-friendly, and they could have more robust support. The support does not respond quickly. They should be able to solve the problems in one or two days, but sometimes it takes time. They constantly ask for logs, and it takes time.

We have been using this solution for three years, and we are using the latest version. It is deployed on-premises and cloud. It gets all the logs in a single platform because we have multiple sites.

The stability is good. I rate it an eight out of ten.

For cloud, the solution is always scalable. We have about ten customers using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer.

I rate the technical support a five out of ten.

The initial setup was not complex.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I mainly use FortiAnalyzer to centralize logs from multiple devices and generate local reports. It can work in two operation modes: as a collector only or an analyzer.

FortiAnalyzer has enriched the visibility for all our security solutions.

FortiAnalyzer's best feature is centralized log analysis. It's based on SQL database, so I can fully customize my report, chart-wise and log-wise, and can create as many reports as I want without any limit. It also has an important feature called Indicators of Compromise, an artificial intelligence feature that detects and alerts you when there is a breach in your entity. 

I've been using FortiAnalyzer for ten years.

FortiAnalyzer is a very mature and stable product.

FortiAnalyzer is scalable. When my organization expands in any way, I can implement a FortiAnalyzer as a collector only, it will collect the log, and I can send this to the main analyzer. If I use the virtual alert mode, this is a stackable license, so I can expand the log size or the internal hard-disc log size by purchasing a license. There is also a workaround solution, to automatically upload the old log file to shared storage and delete the old one, which gives more space in the hard drive.

FortiAnalyzer's technical support is helpful.

Positive

FortiAnalyzer is straightforward to implement and integrate, but a little experience is needed to generate a technical level.

We get good ROI from FortiAnalyzer.

FortiAnalyzer's price could be lower, but it is cheaper than competitors like Palo Alto, Forcepoint, or Sophos. The basic license is available on a yearly basis, but some other licenses can be for three, six, or nine months as required. There are no hidden costs associated with this product.

Don't just depend on the basic reports, you can get much more out of FortiAnalyzer if you know how to create customized reports from the SQL queries. I would give FortiAnalyzer a rating of eight out of ten.

We are using it only for integration and getting information from FortiAnalyzer to use and analyze important events.

The stability is good.

They are able to integrate everything under one umbrella, which is nice. 

The UI and customization are good right now.

The product can scale. 

The pricing could be better. 

We'd like integration with more providers.

The initial setup can be difficult. 

We've used the solution for about a year. 

The stability of the product is good and it has been reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The product can scale. It's simple to expand as necessary. 

I've never had to contact technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they would be.

We are using all the solutions from Fortinet, and FortiAnalyzer. We are planning to use FortiSIEM and FortiWeb.

It's not too easy to set up. It can be a bit difficult. They could make it a little bit easier. 

You only need two people (engineers) to handle deployment and maintenance. 

We are partners for Fortinet. So we are planning to use the FortiEDR, and then we're going to expand.

We only use FortiAnalyzer for internal purposes.

Our company is using the most up-to-date solution. 

I'd advise potential users to look for a partner who knows how to handle the product and use their knowledge to give you quick training for your own people. The learning curve is not that easy.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.