Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Reviews

The customer purchased a Fortinet Firewall in order to run it as a decentralized block and collect amazing security logs from their internet usage or other data from the box. The benefit of having an on-premise firewall is that they don't have to worry about any subscription, and the storage space it consumes is minimal due to the internal hard drive of the FortiAnalyzer. Furthermore, the firewall does not consume a lot of traffic from the internet due to it being on-premise.

The most valuable feature of the solution is reporting. The report that accompanies the solution includes the top 10 usages, threats to be aware of, and any highlights. Additionally, the API can be connected to other systems to receive more notifications.

The solution can improve the incident response function to provide more detailed information on where the incident is originating.

I have been using the solution for three months.

The solution is stable and we have never experienced downtime.

I give the scalability of the solution an eight out of ten.

This solution is suitable for enterprise customers with a large number of devices and logs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer enables the compilation of log files over a period of time, such as 90 days in Thailand. This is especially useful for gathering and analyzing data.

The initial setup is simple. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is an out-of-the-box solution, so we can start customizing as soon as we finish the installation.

I give the cost a seven out of ten. I believe that Fortinet is a cost-effective brand, making it a competitive option in terms of pricing.

An alternative solution is SolarWinds, which analyzes server performance, and could be a competitor's CM solution or a managed service that sends data from sensors on the site to their facility. The primary distinguishing feature of SolarWinds is its form factor. SolarWinds must be installed on a server and requires server resources. In the past, a large amount of OS and other resources were necessary, but the form factor has remained the same.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

Due to the high cost, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is not feasible to use for certain office or branch office environments. A possible compromise could be to use a combination of two solutions: for banks, the file-based solution may be beneficial, but for on-premises locations, it could be worthwhile to make use of the existing value and use it to centrally control and manage the data.

I recommend utilizing the FortiAnalyzer if our log volume is sufficient and we have a FortiGate.

The clients using this solution have wifi for their guests and for their own users. They want to know which user has used their wifi to access the internet, and probably use this knowledge for a kind of security management purpose.

The solution is quite easy to deploy. For the user, they don't need to have a lot of technical know-how. It is easy to generate the report for review by the management.

The solution is stable and reliable.

We have not faced any scalability issues.

The solution should be more price competitive.

I've used the solution for one or two years. I used it on a recent project.

However, the first time I used this product was in 2006 for our own infrastructure. We are not using it in our infrastructure anymore.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is reliable. 

In terms of scalability, it really depends. For our customer, the SME customer, not that many people need it. If you talk about scalability around analysis, related to the hub and space, the hub disk size, and the capacity of the box, for the on-prem model, we need to choose it with some buffer. We can't foresee any scalability issue for that customer. 

We only have one client on the solution. 

While I haven't directly dealt with technical support, I have not heard any complaints from my colleagues that may have. I would say that the support has been satisfactory for the moment.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. That said, I didn't handle it directly. We had an internal team that did the implementation. 

Most of the time, one engineer is sufficient for a small deployment, just two AP, one firewall, and one analyzer.

The implementation work was done by my engineers. We did not need any outside assistance from any integrators or consultants. 

I can't remember if they have a new license for software maintenance. They have maintenance that is charged annually. Unlike a firewall, they have a UTM license you need to pay annually and then only an annual maintenance cost for the hardware, for FortiAnalyzer.

I'm not sure what the exact price is at the moment. However, my understanding is the pricing could be better.

I would recommend the solution to others. We have been happy with its overall capabilities. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a firewall and security gateway.

It is easy to configure.

The end-user finds it very easy to understand. 

It's stable and reliable.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup is easy, and the deployment is fast. 

Technical support is generally helpful. 

I'm not sure if any features need improvement. 

They could improve the user interface a bit. The GUI could be easier to understand.

I've used the solution for four years. 

The solution is very stable. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten in terms of reliability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It's a very scalable solution. I'd rate the ability to extend ten out of ten. It's excellent. 

We work with mostly small and medium companies. 

I haven't been directly involved with support. However, I have an understanding that they are very good. I haven't heard of any complaints. 

Positive

I'm also familiar with Check Point. I prefer Fortinet products. 

The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the ease of setup eight out of ten. It is quite simple. 

Deployment only takes about one week. We can handle the customer's various policies and configurations. 

It only takes one person to deploy and maintain the solution. It's easy to manage the product. The customer can self-learn the solution and manage it once it is launched. 

It is a fairly affordable solution. I'd rate the solution three or four out of ten with ten being the most expensive. It's cheap It's not costly.  

We mostly resell the solution to big and small customers. 

We're using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd recommend Fortigate products to users in general. 

I would rate the solution ten out of ten. 

We use this solution to actively pick up and report on all activities and connectivity going through the FortiGate firewall.

We like the fact that we can run minute-by-minute reporting form this solution.

We also appreciate that the interface of this solution is very good, and doesn't require a lot of configuration, updating, or maintenance.

We would like to see some improvement on the upgrade process around this solution. There are sometimes communication issues when a new version of the firewall is implemented, and it fails to report back to this product.

We would also like to be able to pull off incident reports and display them graphically using this solution.

We have been using this solution for about three years now.

The stability of this solution is okay. There is some room for improvement, and so we would rate the stability as an eight out of ten.

We have found this to be a fairly scalable solution.

The initial setup of this solution is very easy, and takes around three hours to complete the implementation.

We carried out the implementation using in-house resources.

The renewals for this solution are carried out yearly.

We would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution in order to analyze data.

If you have two devices that need to communicate with each other, so you can see where any issue is as you can see every single communication. It shows the flux of communication.

The most valuable aspect of the solution is its ability to pinpoint where the issue is. If two devices need to communicate together, you can see which interfaces they are using. 

The stability has been very good so far. We haven't had any issues with it.

Technical support is always quite responsive and very helpful.

Overall, the product is quite good. It integrates well and has good reporting and logging.

The user interface is good and it is quite easy to use.

From my point of view, at this time, the solution isn't lacking any features or functionalities. It's very complete for our purposes.

I've been working with the solution for less than a year. It's still quite new to me.

The product has been quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its been reliable in terms of performance overall.

I can't speak to the scalability. It's not an aspect of the solution I've tried to deal with. I'm unsure if it expands easily or if it would be difficult to do so.

I personally have opened two tickets with technical support in the past and everything has gone very well. They were knowledgeable and responsive and they helped me solve the issues. I have no complaints about their level of service. I've been very satisfied with them.

By the time I joined my current organization, the solution was already installed and configured. Unfortunately, I was not a part of the process and therefore can speak to how easy or difficult it was.

I don't handle the licensing or the costs. I can't speak to how much it is for our company or if it is expensive or affordable. I'm not privy to that kind of information.

That said, it's my understanding, as a comparison, that Fortinet products are cheaper than their Cisco counterparts.

We just installed our latest version a few weeks ago. It's the brand-new version of the product.

For those considering the solution, I've been told that it's cheaper to buy Fortinet or FortiGate instead of buying Cisco ASA. If cost is a concern, it might be a good idea to look at Fortinet.

We are just customers and end-users of Fortinet. We don't have a business relationship with them.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It's largely been very good.

We use the on-prem deployment model of this solution.

My primary use case for this solution is for log collection. I have a lot of FortiGates that I have to collect logs from, so I primarily use it for log collection. We plan to deploy a SIEM and we want to try to see how to integrate all the solutions to our SIEM. We are processing for PCI data specifications. We have to respond to PCI requirements, so that's why we are making some changes and acquiring some new security solutions to deploy. Among them, we have FortiSIEM and other security solutions like antivirus.

It is a simple and solution. I can structuralize all my FortiGate logs but it's not so good from the administrative side. I have FortiGate in four countries and I am responsible for securing Fortinet. I also have to manage FortiGate in other countries, not just my own. If I have to go through each FortiGate it's going to be a little bit complicated. FortiAnalyzer is a good product; but, I keep thinking that FortiAnalyzer isn't really what I'm looking for which is why I am looking to acquire a SIEM solution. It will give me more log collection possibilities. 

I'm looking for something more efficient to analyze different foreign things. That's why FortiSIEM could compete with FortiAnalyzer. 

I haven't had to contact their technical support yet. 

The initial setup is not that complex. I didn't do the initial configuration, it was already set up, I'm only managing it right now. If we're talking about the integration side, like how to integrate FortiGate in FortiAnalyzer, I don't think it's complex. That's why they are known as one of the leaders in security.

I would recommend this solution to somebody considering it. 

The relevance of this solution will depend on the case. If you are considering this solution I would ask what you really intend to accomplish with it and what model you want. It's going to be based on the data you need to protect and analyze.

If I had to choose between FortiSIEM and FortiAnalyzer for log position it's better to go for SIEM. We all know that we can do a lot more with SIEM than just a log collection. Log collection is included in FortiSIEM; so, why acquire FortiAnalyzer is you can have FortiSIEM?

I would rate FortiAnalyzer a 6.5 out of ten. 

We are using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for the managing surface for our customers. We are a service provider and we are focusing on providing a service to our customers.

The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is its performance.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could improve the user interface, and the experience of users receiving the reports and tracking could be better.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for approximately three years.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is stable.

The support from Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is good.

The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is fine. There is a lot of browsing and a lot of hierarchy that you need to have a particularly good understanding of in order to track the right things that you want to select.

There is a license needed to use this solution.

My advice to others is they have to assess well what kind of specific function or what kind of solution they are looking for.

I recommend this solution to others, but it depends on their usage.

I rate Fortinet FortiAnalyzer a seven out of ten.

We have the most data visibility with this solution.

The user interface could be a bit more user-friendly, and they could have more robust support. The support does not respond quickly. They should be able to solve the problems in one or two days, but sometimes it takes time. They constantly ask for logs, and it takes time.

We have been using this solution for three years, and we are using the latest version. It is deployed on-premises and cloud. It gets all the logs in a single platform because we have multiple sites.

The stability is good. I rate it an eight out of ten.

For cloud, the solution is always scalable. We have about ten customers using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer.

I rate the technical support a five out of ten.

The initial setup was not complex.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten.