| Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find this single product excellent for our business needs, especially its valuable reverse proxy and easy integration. It has no stability issues, but I believe multi-factor authentication with social integration needs improvement, and initial setup is extensive. |
| Infrastructure Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I appreciate the product's valuable SSO for multi-tenant applications. However, I encountered major issues due to its overwhelming complexity, stability problems in earlier versions, and high setup and scaling costs. It demands extensive specialized resources. |
| Senior Consultant at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I find IBM Security Access Manager a strong product, offering robust features like MFA that significantly reduce help desk calls. Its setup is straightforward and it's stable, though the self-service portal needs improvement. |
| Senior IAM/ Security Consultan at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I find the product offers robust security with strong features like OAuth 2 and OIDC. While the UI needs improvement and configuration can be complex, I experienced no stability issues and recommend the latest version. |
| Security architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find this solution promising, especially its 'Verify' feature which could reduce help desk calls and enhance security. I haven't tested its stability or scalability, as it's currently a demo. I'm happy with its potential and roadmap for future security features. |
| Application Development Team Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used this secure, stable solution for three years. While good for large organizations, its high cost and complex setup, plus evolving client needs, are prompting my move to ForgeRock. |
| Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I appreciate its flexible connectivity, stability, and organizational improvements. Setup was straightforward and pricing competitive. My main issues are occasional Java process hangs and missing AngularJS support. Overall, I recommend it. |
| Middleware Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I value IBM TAM's SSO and centralized security, using it five years with straightforward setup. It is a good security product, but iSAM's appliance model and cloud dependency make me consider alternatives. |
![IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/vrgt1zpi8gqi3wy9lt9smu963yx9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/2ha76qegjoso14p9upcxqd07806v.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![One Identity Active Roles vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/kddub7q394o13sm0jkbxad42mmqb.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![SAP Identity Management vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/CEemb89qoUxSyMpYC6s7paQ5.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/bt3ibaqg2dxu2x5kp06x98v0t8m7.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Comarch Identity and Access Management vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PC6GTK4yM9Bc6dzzx3oLovDL.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}