You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Top 10 Inflectra SpiraTest Alternatives

Name: Inflectra SpiraTest
Brand: Inflectra
Rating: 3.7 (25 reviews)

Vendor: Inflectra

3.7 out of 5

25 reviews
76% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Inflectra SpiraTest Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Inflectra SpiraTest based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Jira, IBM DOORS, and OpenText Application Quality Management. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Inflectra SpiraTest surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive test management, seamless integration with popular tools, customizable reporting, and real-time project tracking, empowering teams to efficiently manage requirements, tests, and defects in a user-friendly interface.

Inflectra Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Inflectra, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Jira

4.1 out of 5

Jira

4.1 out of 5

Jira offers flexible project tracking with rich integrations suited for diverse management needs. In comparison, SpiraTest excels in test management functions with tailored testing tools. While Jira supports wider project requirements, SpiraTest focuses on efficient testing with competitive pricing for mid-sized teams.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jira Report

Pricing

Jira has an upfront setup cost, while Inflectra SpiraTest boasts a lower initial price point. This difference highlights a consideration for budget-conscious users looking for a cost-effective test management solution.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM DOORS

4.0 out of 5

IBM DOORS

4.0 out of 5

IBM DOORS offers comprehensive traceability and customization through DXL scripting, ideal for complex, budget-heavy projects. In comparison, SpiraTest prioritizes accessibility and ease of use, cost-effective for smaller teams needing seamless integration and user-friendly interfaces.

Download IBM DOORS vs. Inflectra SpiraTest Report

Pricing

IBM DOORS has a higher setup cost compared to Inflectra SpiraTest, which offers a more affordable initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM DOORS has a higher setup cost compared to Inflectra SpiraTest, which offers a more affordable initial investment.

OpenText Application Quality Management

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Application Quality Management

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Application Quality Management offers a comprehensive solution for enterprise clients needing extensive features, whereas Inflectra SpiraTest provides a budget-friendly option with simpler integration. In comparison, Inflectra emphasizes cost-effectiveness and a straightforward licensing model, while OpenText focuses on customizable enterprise-grade functionalities.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report

Pricing

OpenText Application Quality Management has a higher setup cost than Inflectra SpiraTest, which offers a more affordable initial investment for users. This significant difference may impact the selection for businesses prioritizing upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Jama Connect

3.8 out of 5

Jama Connect

3.8 out of 5

Jama Connect offers strong traceability and integration for requirement management. In comparison, Inflectra SpiraTest excels in test management with customization and automation support. A tech buyer may choose the former for collaboration or the latter for agile deployment and customer support.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jama Connect Report

Pricing

Jama Connect typically incurs a higher initial setup cost, offering robust features, while Inflectra SpiraTest presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Jama Connect typically incurs a higher initial setup cost, offering robust features, while Inflectra SpiraTest presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.

Tricentis qTest

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis qTest

4.1 out of 5

Inflectra SpiraTest offers intuitive defect tracking and custom reporting, ideal for integrating with MS TFS and JIRA. In comparison, Tricentis qTest excels in automation and collaboration, supporting broader integrations and enterprise flexibility, beneficial for large organizations despite greater costs.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Tricentis qTest Report

Pricing

Inflectra SpiraTest offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, while Tricentis qTest demands a significantly higher initial investment. This highlights SpiraTest as the cost-effective choice compared to the premium pricing of qTest.

View comparison

Pricing

TestRail

4.0 out of 5

TestRail

4.0 out of 5

Inflectra SpiraTest offers affordability and extensive customizability, appealing to cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, TestRail provides seamless JIRA integration, emphasizing performance and scalable cloud features. Tech buyers may choose SpiraTest for pricing or TestRail for enhanced integration capabilities and flexible dashboards.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. TestRail Report

Pricing

Inflectra SpiraTest offers a budget-friendly setup cost, while TestRail involves higher initial investment fees; TestRail provides advanced analytics features, contrasting with SpiraTest's focus on integration flexibility.

View comparison

Pricing

Helix ALM

3.2 out of 5

Helix ALM

3.2 out of 5

Helix ALM provides comprehensive requirements and test case management at a competitive price ideal for budget-conscious teams. In comparison, Inflectra SpiraTest, with its integrated test management and extensive reporting tools, offers a broader feature set and superior long-term ROI.

Download Helix ALM vs. Inflectra SpiraTest Report

Pricing

Helix ALM has a higher setup cost compared to Inflectra SpiraTest, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Helix ALM has a higher setup cost compared to Inflectra SpiraTest, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.

Zephyr Enterprise

3.8 out of 5

Zephyr Enterprise

3.8 out of 5

Inflectra SpiraTest is chosen for its cost-effectiveness and personalized support for smaller teams. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise appeals to enterprises with complex testing needs, offering advanced features and extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale operations despite higher costs.

Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report

Pricing

Inflectra SpiraTest offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Zephyr Enterprise has a more variable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Inflectra SpiraTest offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Zephyr Enterprise has a more variable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

4.0 out of 5

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

4.0 out of 5

Inflectra SpiraTest offers cost-effective test management with easy deployment. In comparison, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides advanced modeling features requiring more complex setup. Inflectra caters to smaller budgets, while Broadcom's higher investment supports sophisticated needs for large-scale projects.

Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Inflectra SpiraTest Report

Pricing

Inflectra SpiraTest offers a minimal setup cost, providing an affordable entry point, unlike Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, which has a comparatively higher setup expense. This price difference highlights significant cost variations between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Test Management Tools

Application Requirements Management

AI Quality Assurance