Microsoft Entra ID Reviews

I am currently using Microsoft Entra ID and have been working as a user and administrator for nearly two years. It serves as an ID management tool which used to be called Active Directory on on-prem servers. With the transition to the cloud, it became Microsoft Entra ID.

The features I find most useful in Microsoft Entra ID include sign-in logs, device management, and application registration. With the Entra ID dashboard, I can access logs easily without needing to remote into servers. This tool is excellent for integrating third-party applications through application registration, making it easy to configure for single sign-on seamlessly. It supports conditional access across various Microsoft applications, enhancing secure access.

There should be guidance on features, especially security features, in Entra ID and whether they are sufficient on their own. The solution could become expensive when paying extra for enhanced security features, so Microsoft needs to offer better clarity on this matter.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for almost two years.

In terms of stability, I can say it is ninety-nine percent stable. The remaining one percent instability is mainly due to the hybrid setup.

I have no complaints regarding scalability for Microsoft Entra ID.

The customer service and support are excellent. I experienced a fast resolution within half an hour for an issue by the first line engineer on a Severity A case, which shows support is very good even with minimal licenses.

I am not aware of the solutions used prior to Microsoft Entra ID, as I have been involved for the last two years only.

Since it is a SaaS model, everything is set up, and I just need to configure it according to my needs.

We did not require any integrator, reseller, or consultant for the deployment as we managed it internally, using Microsoft's extensive documentation for guidance.

Microsoft Entra ID is reportedly quite expensive for each user regarding security features. The renewal cost is particularly high according to the teams managing purchases.

I have only been involved with Microsoft Entra ID and am aware of another identity management solution called NetIQ, but Microsoft Entra ID is prioritized.

Users should prepare technically before using Microsoft Entra ID, especially in understanding ID management and security integration with applications. Microsoft Entra ID is regarded as the best ID management suite for integrating applications using SAML 2.0 for single sign-on. My total rating for Microsoft Entra ID is nine out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Our primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID is mainly for single sign-on (SSO). We use it to log into other cloud-based applications. We have an internal sync from Active Directory to Microsoft Entra ID. Whenever an account is created in Active Directory, we immediately create an account in Microsoft Entra ID to automatically grant access to cloud-based applications. Some roles are assigned based on Microsoft Entra ID data.

Microsoft Entra ID's ability to extend and divide multiple applications based on requirements is valuable. It allows easy integration with One Identity and enables effective application management. The security configuration is straightforward and limits access to admin only, ensuring data integrity. Microsoft Entra ID enhances the Zero Trust model by providing simple integration and dedicated permissions for each application. Its features like token replay detection, attack-in-the-middle detection, and especially verify threat actor IP have been impactful in defending against threats.

I suggest improving the connector part. For technical users like me, it is manageable, but having comprehensive documentation for those who aren't familiar with the system would be beneficial. Additionally, synchronization issues occasionally occur, making it challenging to analyze logs and pinpoint the exact problem. Providing more detailed log information for synchronization failures would be helpful.

I have been working with Microsoft Entra ID for approximately six years.

I encountered no issues with the deployment of Microsoft Entra ID.

I find the stability of Microsoft Entra ID to be excellent. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

In terms of scalability, I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a nine out of ten.

I rate Azure Technical Support a nine out of ten. Whenever we require support, we receive it promptly.

Positive

I have primarily used Microsoft Entra ID. In various projects, we consistently used it and didn't switch to other solutions.

The initial setup of Microsoft Entra ID was simple.

We used an out-of-the-box connector available in One Identity management for connecting processes. It's easily available for configuration, and we customize it as per requirements.

The pricing for the setup and the cost overall is reasonable. I would rate the pricing nine out of ten, as per today's market.

Based on my experience, I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a ten out of ten. Setting up Microsoft Entra ID was simple. In terms of company size, I recommend it for enterprise-level companies. I find the overall pricing to be average but reasonable. As a real user of Microsoft Entra ID, I am not affiliated with the vendor or partners.

Hybrid Cloud

Other

We use Entra ID for single sign-on to all of our internal IT systems and public SaaS offerings within the company.

Entra ID streamlines permission management and authentication for most systems. It also unifies IDs, simplifies IT operations internally, and enhances security by enforcing a better security posture across the organization.

We like the ease of app registrations and single sign-on with Entra ID. It offers an easy way to add multi-factor authentication to nearly any application and system. 

We've used it within AKS clusters to do pod identities. That has greatly reduced the number of static credentials we have running around and drastically improved our security. Combining Entra ID with the amazing work of our AKS team has enabled us to shrink the blast radius of credentials given to applications instead of only at the node level. This has allowed us to scope down permissions to an application level instead of the Kubernetes cluster, making it more secure and much closer to a full zero-trust solution.

Entra has helped us fight token theft. We almost always use short-lived tokens, which help us address many of these challenges. They still exist for certain use cases, but they've been drastically reduced due to our ability to use short-lived tokens.

We have never had an identity-related attack because we're lucky. However, that's just a matter of time until we do in this industry. Not having them before does not mean that we're not better protected now

The automation aspects of Entra ID could be improved, particularly when automating through different providers and SDKs. It's somewhat clunky to automate ID management, but it's great once it's set up. I would also like to see better Terraform support. 

I have used Entra ID for the last three years.

The stability has been great. I haven't had any issues.

The scalability is great. I've hit no issues in terms of scalability.

I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10. Microsoft customer service is the best in the industry. There are immediate answers to any issues that arise with great knowledge and a deep understanding of the product and business needs.

Positive

I've used multiple solutions in the past, including Google authentication and Okta. I switched mostly to consolidate and for a better feature set that integrated better with the rest of our Microsoft products.

The setup is one of the easiest I've seen in the industry. It's very easy to onboard.

We used ourselves since we're an integration company.

We have seen a return on investment. We already have Entra ID, and like many customers, we haven't used it to its fullest potential. We get a return from not needing to pay other vendors to do what we already had from Microsoft, which was better than the competition.

We evaluated Workspace ONE, Google, and Okta before switching.

I rate Microsoft Entra ID nine out of 10. Without good Terraform support, it will stay below a 10, but everything else is so great.

Our primary use case is for identity platform and security platform, mainly for multi-factor authentication (MFA), to make all access to our enterprise applications unified for each user.

Our most valuable features are conditional access and Azure application proxy. The passkeys are a significant improvement, giving us the most phishing-resistant MFA.

Entra allows us to provide access to more users without a VPN, especially for our web-based platforms, which are published with the application proxy and MFA. Reducing VPN usage has been beneficial for us. The ability to offer employees access to any platform, including private PCs and tablets, has been a game-changer.

Private access and internet access should be available in a less expensive licensing model.

I was using Active Directory for more than 10 years before we switched to Entra ID.

We have experienced no problems with stability. We have had full uptime at all times.

Entra is a cloud solution, so scalability is not a problem for us.

The technical support has its downsides and upsides. While they are fast, it can take time to get the right person because there are many steps to reach the appropriate team member at Microsoft support, which can be somewhat annoying.

Neutral

We started with Office 365, so there was a clear statement that we would be using this solution.

The initial setup was prompted by the COVID pandemic and was executed as a big bang.

We only used Microsoft with direct workshops, and all the specialists had their work done well.

We are an enterprise customer with an enterprise agreement in place with many of our partner companies, so there are no special questions or issues about pricing, setup cost, or licensing.

I rate Entra ID 10 out of 10. We are fully satisfied. It's a seamless transition from Active Directory. There is no steep learning curve, and our knowledge from Active Directory allows for a fast ramp-up.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We use Microsoft Entra ID for multi-factor authentication (MFA) and users logging in for any Microsoft applications, especially for Microsoft 365.

Microsoft Entra ID has helped make our company more secure. Conditional access policies have assisted our users in logging in from various locations, not just on-premises.

Microsoft Entra ID makes the apps or resources in our environment more secure, especially with conditional access policies.

We use the cloud sync, so we can sync up with our Active Directory user accounts with the on-premise AD. There is a single password for the user, so we can put all the policy requirements and password complexities around it. It helps when the user does not have all these separate passwords, and we can make passwords more complex for better security.

We have not used the device-bound passkeys, but the Microsoft Authenticator app has helped a lot in terms of proving that the users are who they say they are, helping with the MFA authentication. It is a pretty easy-to-use app, especially with the number verification. It provides an extra later when someone is not just accepting an MFA prompt on their phone in the middle of the night.

Microsoft Entra ID has helped us defend against token theft and nation-state attacks. We were at more risk without it. It has helped us to better secure our environment and our users.

When we implemented it many moons ago, it increased our incidents, but Microsoft has gotten a lot better and the incident count has dropped dramatically. When you put in your users' ability to log into the cloud, if anyone has an email address of a user, they can just go to Microsoft.com and try to log in. That increases incidents, but the MFA and contextual policies help reduce the incident count.

I find the conditional access policies to be the most valuable. They provide a lot of granularity in determining where the users can log in from, how they log in, and what they have access to.

Having a little bit more logging would be beneficial. Better user sign-in logging is needed. We work with Okta, and the two of them do not always work well together. We can have more insight into some of the user information and how it interacts.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for about six years.

Microsoft Entra ID is a stable solution. We rarely had significant problems or crashes. We have had very few issues over the years.

We have never had any issues with the scalability of Microsoft Entra ID.

I would rate their technical support a six out of ten. It requires starting at the bottom and working our way up, which is time-consuming. The tech support model or the person we are working with is not always knowledgeable to the level we need help. 

Before we call support, we would have already exhausted many possibilities. Having to start at the bottom and go through it all over again is frustrating because time is very critical. When working with support, it can be frustrating because we have to go over things that we have already tried to resolve.

The time they take to get back to us is also sometimes longer. They have their SLAs, but when you are back and forth with the rep, it sometimes takes a lot of time.

Neutral

We were a Novell shop before migrating to Microsoft. The decision to migrate happened many years ago before my time at the company.

We have a hybrid setup. We had a partner to help us. It was fairly easy. I have since done smaller implementations on my own, and it is fairly straightforward and easy.

Our partner had an implementation strategy for us. We worked with them to implement the solution.

Our implementation team was assisted by a partner named Araya. Working with them was a good experience. We were able to get everything migrated and launched in Microsoft Azure. Overall, it was a good experience, enabling us to launch in Microsoft Azure successfully.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a nine out of ten. You have to do a lot to get a ten.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

I use Entra to log into systems and applications, mainly within the office for work-related tasks and for other applications that accept Microsoft Authentication. I always use my work ID to log in when I can. Within the organization, everyone has an ID, so I'm engaged with the onboarding process, but I don't create the IDs.

I don't know what they had before Entra, but if we didn't have the solution, we wouldn't have a security model for Microsoft 365 products like Outlook, Excel, and all the other Office stuff. We wouldn't have a secondary way to identify people. Entra hooks into everything else that Microsoft does, making it much easier to manage security across systems and platforms.

Entra has made securing our apps and resources more straightforward. Microsoft has updated security methods to make its authentication more secure. The solution has facilitated our Zero Trust Model. You can't use the computers without authenticating. There is no public access, so unless you sneak up behind someone and take over their computer, you can't do anything without an ID.

I'm not on the security team, so I don't know the effect of Entra on the number of security incidents. Anecdotally, I know that some people at my organization don't like passwords, and they've had to get over that. Those people have likely seen a drastic decrease in identity theft incidents.

I love how it uniquely identifies a person universally. If you have the email address, it will be the same account across most platforms. If everything is set up correctly, it's easy to identify a person and get all kinds of information about them from Azure or whichever system. 

Microsoft support has some room for improvement. I avoid contacting them because it can be time-consuming. They don't necessarily find the solution, but you have to be on call for them to connect and do things on your system remotely. You have to schedule a time to meet with them, and it's somewhat inconvenient.

I've been using Entra ID for about 12 years.

Entra has never gone down as far as I know, so it's 100 percent stable.

It's stable for our organization of about three hundred people and can handle scalability.

I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. 

Neutral

The biggest return on investment on Entra is improved security, ensuring our organization is less of a target. It works how it's intended and does a good job.

It's the most basic Azure service available, and I understand it's cost-effective. You need a tenant to use Entra to authenticate.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a solid 10 out of 10.

On-premises

At first, we used Entra for Single Sign-On (SSO) purposes, but there are multiple use cases. It is the backbone of managing identities and access to Microsoft 365, for which we have licenses. We were also using it for SSO authentication for third-party applications.

We do not use Microsoft Authenticator. We use ADFS, which is federated with Entra, and we are integrated into that, so we do not use Microsoft Authenticator except for admin accounts.

Entra has had a positive impact by enabling us to synchronize the IDs from on-prem to Entra ID and grant access to applications based on those users and their groups. 

The identity and access management piece is probably the most valuable to us. Since its implementation, synchronizing the identities from on-premise to Entra ID has had a positive impact. This allows us to grant access to applications based on those users and the groups they belong to. 

The conditional access policies are helpful. They let you control access based on what devices they connect from. The conditional access policies prevent people from accessing our environment from outside our domain or non-company computers. We've relied on the verified threat actor feature to identify whether it's a real user or a bad actor based on the source.

The area that needs improvement is integrating IDs between multiple environments and forests. In our case, it's hard to get the identities from multiple forests into one location. This is probably our biggest challenge.

I've used Entra for about eight years since we opened our commercial cloud.

I haven't had any issues with the virtual machine, so it is stable.

It's been great. We have the upgrade support package, but actually, most of the built-in support is the best.

Neutral

We previously used ADFS and switched mainly because of our licensing model and to gain access to Microsoft 365. So it just became an extension of it.

Ultimately, it's the base setup for everything. It's Microsoft 365, so it's a required piece. It's hard to quantify our ROI because it's just something we need. 

I rate Entra ID seven out of 10 because it's hard to have a single tie to integrate all identities within our core curriculum due to multiple forests.

Public Cloud

We use Microsoft Entra ID to secure Boulevard by Density.

Entra's multifactor authentication has kept our organization secure. We've decreased the number of password resets and extended the length of passwords, which has kept users happy and improved security.

Entra's conditional access policies allow us to fine-tune how we allow people into the environments and secure them. Microsoft Entra ID has also massively improved secure access to apps or resources compared to our previous setup. We've rolled out Microsoft Authenticator. That went pretty well, pretty smooth. The users seem to enjoy ID. And, yeah, we're starting on passwordless soon.

There are no specific areas where improvement is needed at the moment. Everything has been good so far.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for about six years.

There have been a couple of outages so that I would rate the stability around a seven out of 10.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. Customer service and technical support have been pretty good.

Positive

We did not use any different solutions before implementing Microsoft Entra ID.

The initial setup and experience with deploying Microsoft Azure ID was straightforward.

We used an integrated reseller or consultant for the deployment.

We have seen a return on investment because Entra is included in licenses we already own. Deploying it was a no-brainer. 

The solution was included in the licenses we already had, so it presented a no-brainer setup cost.

I rate Entra ID nine out of 10. 

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My organization's approach to defending against token theft and nation-state attacks since implementing Microsoft Entra ID does erase a few of the common attack vectors that are worth solving. Prior to adopting Microsoft Entra ID, I was using another solution to address similar needs.

The features of Microsoft Entra ID that I like the most are its ease of use.

The impact that the implementation of Microsoft Entra ID has had on my secure access to apps or resources in my environment is negative, because it opens up more security awareness and public awareness of who is in the ecosystem. Then you have other attackers looking at, 'Hey, there's Microsoft Entra ID out there. Let's go figure out...' So, it's not exactly a good thing.

Microsoft Entra ID's integration capabilities have not influenced my zero-trust model.

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved by open-sourcing it. You already have Windows Subsystem for Linux, which is open-source Linux in Microsoft. One major shift for Microsoft would be using the common community to help make it better and more secure. We would not have to do things with it if you open-sourced it.

The implementation of device-bound passkeys and Microsoft Authenticator has affected my organization's approach by suggesting to get rid of passkeys. You want non-attribution. You want to still have a password. You do not want a central authority that requires fingerprints, facial recognition, or passwords. That is changing our world. I do have passkeys, but I try to not use them. When they are forced on you, we see the same thing being forced on you, verifying your age. Why is your age related to having an account on your library?

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for six months.

I assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Entra ID as having nothing worth a report. It is a good piece of software.

The factors that led me to consider a change to Microsoft Entra ID were that I wanted a better, holistic solution available. Years ago here, I bought someone lunch just to talk with them, and they said, 'Hey, so if we made a silver bullet solution, how would we eat?' Point made. So, I was exploring other things I could use that I could virtualize or not. I am all Linux. I can virtualize anything. I was exploring other opportunities to see if they could help me out instead of causing another headache.

I would describe my experience with deploying Microsoft Entra ID as a command line for me. It is a script. It does its job.

Before selecting Microsoft Entra ID, I considered a few open-source ones that can do what I need. There are not too many, but this is worth looking at.

What stood out to me in the evaluation process between those solutions and Microsoft Entra ID is that my whole ecosystem is primarily Linux. Microsoft Entra ID does not orchestrate or interface well with that type of environment. If you have a smaller or larger enterprise that is all one homogeneous Microsoft environment, it probably fits. However, I run entirely Linux, so it does not work for my situation.

My advice to other organizations considering Microsoft Entra ID is to buy time until some open-source style technology is available and do more exploration. I would rate this review a seven out of ten overall.

On-premises

Other

We are a Microsoft partner, and all our internal computing is on Microsoft 365, managed by Microsoft ID and Intune. Entra ID serves as our directory containing all our users and guest users, and it's managed by Intune.

It simplifies the management of identities in our hybrid environment, covering on-prem and Azure. It streamlines integration with other Microsoft technologies like Authenticator, SSO, and MFA. Entra ID is crucial to our zero-trust model based on Microsoft security.

Entra ID's anti-phishing measures have improved our phishing response. We had phishing tests a month ago, and some employees still fell for it but the number has dropped. I think we've prevented some security incidents using Entra ID with other apps.

Entra ID is our directory that registers all users, guest users, and even labs. It's integrated with Microsoft technologies like Authenticator, SSO, and MFA, streamlining operations and creating a seamless environment.

Entra ID has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions like iOS or Ubuntu. If it worked across different software and all kinds of devices could be managed under it, that would be great.

We have been using Microsoft Entra ID for quite some time, as it replaced Active Directory when we moved from an on-prem solution.

The platform is stable. We haven't encountered any problems.

It is deployed across all of our employees within the company and group of companies. If we had to deploy it further, it would be straightforward as we frequently deploy it for customers.

I rate Microsoft support four out of 10. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support could be better. It's not timely or professional. They often provide solutions we've already tried. 

Neutral

We previously used Active Directory, which Microsoft Entra ID replaced when we transitioned from on-prem.

Our in-house team handled the implementation.

Compared to other Microsoft products, the cost is not too expensive. There's a free tier available, though it doesn't include all features. Overall, it's well-priced.

We did not evaluate another solution before implementing Entra ID.

I rate Entra ID nine out of 10. 

Hybrid Cloud