Microsoft Entra ID Reviews

I'm developing a SaaS application. I'm working with a company that develops a SaaS application where the first customers are Azure customers. Most of our customers are using Microsoft Entra ID as their single sign-on implementation. I saw not only my organization's Microsoft Entra ID configuration but also others. 

The smooth integration with Azure is a significant benefit of Microsoft Entra ID. We could see the benefits of Microsoft Entra ID immediately after starting to use it.

The UI of Microsoft Entra ID is very intuitive, and I appreciate the integration with Azure because it works seamlessly. This is the best aspect I appreciate about Microsoft Entra ID.

There is a feature that we have been waiting for regarding Bicep templates. The option to use Bicep templates to deploy Microsoft Entra ID objects from the Azure Portal is needed. The deadlines for this feature were set for March, and that has already passed without deployment. We commented that we are still waiting for that, and they commented that they would update us when it is finished, but we haven't received any update about it. This feature is very important.

I've used many variations of Microsoft Entra ID. It was Active Directory in on-premises situations, but for the last three years, I've been using Microsoft Entra ID, and in the last year, I've been using it heavily.

I have not experienced any instability such as lagging, crashing, or downtime with Microsoft Entra ID.

We have tested extensively concerning scalability, and Microsoft Entra ID is working well in all of our use cases.

I have contacted their technical support and customer support. Their response was very fast, taking less than a day, but the response was not clear because they didn't update the deadline and didn't provide much information. They just told us that it's still in internal testing, and they don't have a date when it will be announced, which is problematic.

Neutral

I have used G Suite as an alternative to Microsoft Entra ID. Smooth integration with Azure is a significant benefit for Microsoft Entra ID. The integration with the Microsoft ecosystem is much better in Microsoft Entra ID. However, integrations with Chrome and other Google products are better in G Suite.

I was not the one who implemented it. My onboarding with Microsoft Entra ID was pretty easy to learn. It took me a few hours to learn how to use Microsoft Entra ID.

It doesn't require any maintenance on our end.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a ten out of ten.

We have been using Microsoft Enterprise for ten years, and we actually started beginning to really use it about two years ago. Earlier, we had an access manager on the premises, but everything is moving to the cloud. So we are moving our access management and identity management solutions to the cloud as well.

The whole access management solution is valuable. In 2015, we were selecting a new access management solution, and because it was already integrated, we started using it. 

Integration with Defender allows us to get alerts and respond to them by blocking users. Microsoft Entra ID has streamlined and centralized our device management and threat response processes.

We are looking for more customization with BRAIN and everything else, and while they are following up on that, we want some more of it.

We have experienced some downtime because of the use of the data centers.

In Microsoft technical support or Microsoft Denmark, we have an account manager and strategist, whom we contact along with the suppliers who have their own technicians. The experience has been positive.

Positive

Earlier, we had an access manager on the premises before moving to Microsoft Enterprise for cloud-based solutions. In 2015, we selected a different access management solution initially.

Would you rate the overall solution on a scale of 1 to 10? Yeah, excellent. From one to ten, would you mind the call? I think, yeah, excellent.

Microsoft Entra ID serves as an identity protector and service privilege manager.

It has enabled my organization to build a secure environment for user login and asset access. We can enable secure user logins and access to assets.

When we implement app access with Microsoft Entra ID, it gives us confidence that we have secure authentication for our applications.

With privilege identity management, we can grant or escalate rights to a role for a short duration of time and not forever. It is a great feature. It is useful to validate the escalation of privileges. 

Federation on access service principle and the ability to be passwordless in certain use cases are valuable. Federated identity management is a great feature for the zero-trust model. 

Microsoft Entra ID could benefit from more fine-tuned rights. It is necessary to prevent granting an application or user broad access rights. A more precise approach would allow for specific rights, limited to certain contexts within the organization.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for three years.

Microsoft Entra ID efficiently responds to numerous requests, and we have not faced significant connectivity issues, making it reliable.

Their customer support is good.

Positive

I have not used any other solution. I was previously using Azure AD. About two years ago, it was renamed to Microsoft Entra ID.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a nine out of ten.

I handle access management.

Microsoft Entra ID has positively impacted the secure access to apps and resources in our environment. It's just easy to integrate.

It makes management easier. We have visibility into password compromises and other things.

What I appreciate the most about Microsoft Entra ID is that it integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products, which streamlines the process.

It integrates with applications, such as our Password Manager, and multi-factor authentication, and it integrates with Office 365 and third-party applications. That's very useful.

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved by having more resources for learning how to best use the tool and understanding best use case scenarios. The learning curve is challenging, so I would appreciate seeing a training portal that is easier to use. I would appreciate seeing more guides and training materials about Microsoft Entra ID.

I have been using it for six months.

The stability and reliability of Microsoft Entra ID are good. It is very reliable, and I have never experienced any problems.

Microsoft Entra ID is very scalable with third-party applications.

We have been using Entrust within our environment, and Microsoft Entra ID is in our larger environment. We use both solutions.

The biggest return on investment when using Microsoft Entra ID is the integration with third-party applications.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a nine out of ten.

We use Entra ID for single sign-on to all of our internal IT systems and public SaaS offerings within the company.

Entra ID streamlines permission management and authentication for most systems. It also unifies IDs, simplifies IT operations internally, and enhances security by enforcing a better security posture across the organization.

We like the ease of app registrations and single sign-on with Entra ID. It offers an easy way to add multi-factor authentication to nearly any application and system. 

We've used it within AKS clusters to do pod identities. That has greatly reduced the number of static credentials we have running around and drastically improved our security. Combining Entra ID with the amazing work of our AKS team has enabled us to shrink the blast radius of credentials given to applications instead of only at the node level. This has allowed us to scope down permissions to an application level instead of the Kubernetes cluster, making it more secure and much closer to a full zero-trust solution.

Entra has helped us fight token theft. We almost always use short-lived tokens, which help us address many of these challenges. They still exist for certain use cases, but they've been drastically reduced due to our ability to use short-lived tokens.

We have never had an identity-related attack because we're lucky. However, that's just a matter of time until we do in this industry. Not having them before does not mean that we're not better protected now

The automation aspects of Entra ID could be improved, particularly when automating through different providers and SDKs. It's somewhat clunky to automate ID management, but it's great once it's set up. I would also like to see better Terraform support. 

I have used Entra ID for the last three years.

The stability has been great. I haven't had any issues.

The scalability is great. I've hit no issues in terms of scalability.

I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10. Microsoft customer service is the best in the industry. There are immediate answers to any issues that arise with great knowledge and a deep understanding of the product and business needs.

Positive

I've used multiple solutions in the past, including Google authentication and Okta. I switched mostly to consolidate and for a better feature set that integrated better with the rest of our Microsoft products.

The setup is one of the easiest I've seen in the industry. It's very easy to onboard.

We used ourselves since we're an integration company.

We have seen a return on investment. We already have Entra ID, and like many customers, we haven't used it to its fullest potential. We get a return from not needing to pay other vendors to do what we already had from Microsoft, which was better than the competition.

We evaluated Workspace ONE, Google, and Okta before switching.

I rate Microsoft Entra ID nine out of 10. Without good Terraform support, it will stay below a 10, but everything else is so great.

At first, we used Entra for Single Sign-On (SSO) purposes, but there are multiple use cases. It is the backbone of managing identities and access to Microsoft 365, for which we have licenses. We were also using it for SSO authentication for third-party applications.

We do not use Microsoft Authenticator. We use ADFS, which is federated with Entra, and we are integrated into that, so we do not use Microsoft Authenticator except for admin accounts.

Entra has had a positive impact by enabling us to synchronize the IDs from on-prem to Entra ID and grant access to applications based on those users and their groups. 

The identity and access management piece is probably the most valuable to us. Since its implementation, synchronizing the identities from on-premise to Entra ID has had a positive impact. This allows us to grant access to applications based on those users and the groups they belong to. 

The conditional access policies are helpful. They let you control access based on what devices they connect from. The conditional access policies prevent people from accessing our environment from outside our domain or non-company computers. We've relied on the verified threat actor feature to identify whether it's a real user or a bad actor based on the source.

The area that needs improvement is integrating IDs between multiple environments and forests. In our case, it's hard to get the identities from multiple forests into one location. This is probably our biggest challenge.

I've used Entra for about eight years since we opened our commercial cloud.

I haven't had any issues with the virtual machine, so it is stable.

It's been great. We have the upgrade support package, but actually, most of the built-in support is the best.

Neutral

We previously used ADFS and switched mainly because of our licensing model and to gain access to Microsoft 365. So it just became an extension of it.

Ultimately, it's the base setup for everything. It's Microsoft 365, so it's a required piece. It's hard to quantify our ROI because it's just something we need. 

I rate Entra ID seven out of 10 because it's hard to have a single tie to integrate all identities within our core curriculum due to multiple forests.

We use Microsoft Entra ID to secure Boulevard by Density.

Entra's multifactor authentication has kept our organization secure. We've decreased the number of password resets and extended the length of passwords, which has kept users happy and improved security.

Entra's conditional access policies allow us to fine-tune how we allow people into the environments and secure them. Microsoft Entra ID has also massively improved secure access to apps or resources compared to our previous setup. We've rolled out Microsoft Authenticator. That went pretty well, pretty smooth. The users seem to enjoy ID. And, yeah, we're starting on passwordless soon.

There are no specific areas where improvement is needed at the moment. Everything has been good so far.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for about six years.

There have been a couple of outages so that I would rate the stability around a seven out of 10.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. Customer service and technical support have been pretty good.

Positive

We did not use any different solutions before implementing Microsoft Entra ID.

The initial setup and experience with deploying Microsoft Azure ID was straightforward.

We used an integrated reseller or consultant for the deployment.

We have seen a return on investment because Entra is included in licenses we already own. Deploying it was a no-brainer. 

The solution was included in the licenses we already had, so it presented a no-brainer setup cost.

I rate Entra ID nine out of 10. 

Entra ID covers our entire user identity stack, including authentication. Interactive capabilities are particularly useful.

Microsoft Entra ID has helped the company with user identities, user device management, and endpoint management. We use it with other Microsoft products like Defender for Endpoint and Sentinel to improve our security. 

Active Directory has conditional access, so you only log in from a company device. You also have multi-factor authentication and other systems generate tokens. It's well protected.

The integration with all Microsoft services and external applications is crucial. Microsoft Entra ID has helped the company with user identities, user device management, and endpoint management. Integration capabilities are significant.

There should be a clearer separation between objects held in Entra and Azure, so we don't need to approach the Entra ID team to create rules, policies, and app registrations. It would help if we could make independent IDs on the Azure side to go through that team to create a role, change permissions, or create something for a specific task.

I've used Entra for the last couple of years but have worked with Microsoft solutions for 30 years. Entra ID is the successor to Azure Active Directory

Microsoft Entra ID is a stable platform. There was a big incident with Azure Active Directory a few years ago, but since then, Microsoft has worked to distribute the risk properly.

There is no issue with scalability.

I rate Microsoft support eight out of 10. They respond quickly, but the solutions aren't always satisfactory. Microsoft cannot test some things internally when you face a problem. 

Positive

Before Entra ID, I used the on-prem Active Directory for around 30 years. The foundation of Entra and Azure Active Directory comes from Active Directory.

Initially, we could complete the setup by following the guides, but now the setup is more complicated. 

We try to handle implementation in-house, supported by an external company that acts as an outsourced part of the team.

I am aware of the tier we use and know the pricing per user or account, but I am not in procurement.

I rate Entra ID nine out of 10.