Top 10 Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Alternatives

Name: Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
Brand: Netskope
Rating: 4.4 (15 reviews)

Vendor: Netskope

4.4 out of 5

15 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, iboss, and Cloudflare One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway surpasses its competitors by offering real-time data protection, comprehensive threat detection, and seamless integration, ensuring superior cloud security and enhanced user experience for businesses seeking advanced digital protection.

Netskope Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Netskope, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate captivates with competitive pricing, seamless SD-WAN integration, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Netskope attracts tech buyers seeking advanced cloud-native security with granular data protection, extensive application support, and a scalable, cloud-centric deployment model despite potentially higher initial costs.

Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss

4.2 out of 5

Iboss is utilized for web filtering in K-12, securing networks, and ensuring appropriate internet use. Organizations use iboss for data protection, proxy services, VPN, and AI projects. It offers inline filtering, cloud proxy, and SSL inspection with AD integration. Users seek improved reporting, cloud integration, and enhanced security layers.

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. iboss Report

Pricing

It is expensive compared to one of its competitors.

The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent.

View comparison

Pricing

It is expensive compared to one of its competitors.

The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent.

Cloudflare One

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare One provides robust network security with features like advanced firewalls and Zero Trust architecture, ideal for scalable access. In comparison, Netskope offers superior cloud security with detailed control over cloud data, appealing to those prioritizing cloud-focused operations despite higher costs.

Download Cloudflare One vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Cloudflare One offers competitive setup costs, emphasizing affordability for businesses, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway presents higher initial fees, reflecting its advanced features and depth of security.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella is chosen for its ease of use, centralization, threat intelligence, and DNS protection, appealing to those prioritizing integration. In comparison, Netskope offers a comprehensive security stack, making it ideal for buyers seeking advanced features like CASB and threat protection.

Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway may require higher initial investment, highlighting different target markets.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway may require higher initial investment, highlighting different target markets.

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access excels in zero-trust architecture and seamless scalability, making it ideal for complex configurations. In comparison, Netskope offers superior cloud security features like CASB and DLP, appealing to organizations prioritizing cloud-centric security. Each solution presents tailored benefits for distinct cybersecurity needs.

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks incurs higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers more economical initial pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks incurs higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers more economical initial pricing.

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access offers advanced security with comprehensive threat protection, ideal for large-scale deployments. In comparison, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway excels in cost-effectiveness and seamless SaaS integration, suitable for organizations seeking adaptable security measures at a lower total cost.

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation for users.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation for users.

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE specializes in secure access and efficient management with robust VPN configuration and zero trust access. In comparison, Netskope offers superior data protection and traffic analysis, excelling in SaaS platform security and centralized management for effective threat intelligence and data protection enhancements.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost than Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost than Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security offers robust monitoring and cloud service risk assessment, emphasizing DLP, anomaly detection, and threat prevention. In comparison, Netskope excels with strong policy enforcement for SaaS platforms and access controls, offering superior cloud security, stability, and cloud-focused deployment models.

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. Skyhigh Security Report

Pricing

Skyhigh Security is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is noted for higher initial expenses but offers a broader feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Skyhigh Security is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is noted for higher initial expenses but offers a broader feature set.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager excels in handling complex challenges through features like SSL VPN and load balancing, ideal for banks. In comparison, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway offers simplicity with strong cloud-based features such as CASB and advanced threat prevention, appealing for scalable SaaS integrations.

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more straightforward and cost-effective implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more straightforward and cost-effective implementation.

Prisma Access Browser

4.0 out of 5

Prisma Access Browser

4.0 out of 5

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway excels in pricing, support, and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser offers comprehensive features and scalability, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing extensive coverage despite its higher initial cost.

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. Prisma Access Browser Report

Pricing

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway has a straightforward setup, whereas Prisma Access Browser involves higher initial costs. This distinction highlights a key difference in setup cost efficiency between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 11 more products

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Firewalls

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)