The dashboard is great.
It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently.
The product is stable.
You can scale the solution.
Technical support has been good.
The dashboard is great.
It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently.
The product is stable.
You can scale the solution.
Technical support has been good.
Some production features are lacking. For example, we cannot see any dashboards in the production department. The generation of reports needs to be better. We have sales reports and yet no production reports.
It's a complex initial setup.
It can be an expensive solution.
I've used the solution for six years.
The stability is very, very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
The scalability is very good. It's very capable.
I've used technical support in the past. They are good.
I did not use a different solution. I use what my company uses in order to get reports.
The initial setup is difficult and complex. It's very complex compared to SQL, for example.
The initial deployment took 15 days, however, nowadays, it takes one or two days. Mostly, I can complete it in one day.
I'm a business consultant. I do implementations for various parts of my customers' organizations.
The licensing is typically chared yearly. It was rather expensive.
We deploy the solution mostly on-premises and sometimes on the cloud. When we use the cloud, we usually use the AWS cloud.
I'd warn new users that it might be difficult the initial time they use it if they are changing their ERP, however,t it'll be very helpful in the future if they're using it frequently.
I'd rate the entire product an eight out of ten. There are other well-known ERPs, such as Salesforce, and companies expect to have the same features. However, not everything may be on SAP, and that's something they need to work on.
The most valuable features are the flexibility and the integration with other solutions in data quality.
HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution.
I've been using this solution for two or three months.
The support is good and is available 24/7.
I'd rate SAP HANA as nine out of ten.
The internet of things, big data, and utilization of block chain will be possible with HANA.
It's a reliable and fast solution.
It is very stable and very innovative. You can integrate many applications with it.
The worst thing about SAP HANA is the price; it's very expensive. The licensing cost, implementation cost, hosting cost, and appliance cost are all high.
We've been using it for three years now.
It's a cloud-based solution.
It is a very stable solution.
It's very scalable.
The technical support has been fine.
We were running SAP on Oracle, and then we switched to HANA.
If it's a new installation, it is straightforward. However, if it's a migration from one system to a new system, it's not as straightforward as you might think it would be.
We utilized around 30 technical and functional staff because we were leaving our legacy system behind and migrating to a new one.
We pay for a maintenance license, and the licensing cost is high. In general, it is a very expensive solution.
This product covers almost everything, and it's scalable and very innovative. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate SAP HANA at nine.
We are using this solution for enterprise resource planning.
The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well.
I have been using this solution for approximately five years.
The solution is stable. I have not had any bugs or issues.
We have over 50 people using the solution in my organization.
The technical support is good.
The initial setup is straightforward.
We used an integrator for the implementation of the solution and we were satisfied.
The price is high and could be a bit cheaper.
I rate SAP HANA a six out of ten.
We are using this product for IAM.
Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics.
The most valuable feature is optimization.
The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement.
I have been working with SAP HANA for between three and four years.
The stability is okay.
It scales well and we have had no trouble with it.
The technical support is good.
The deployment was straightforward.
We had assistance from an SAP partner for deployment.
The price of this product is good.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
The solution operates well. I had no problems with the functionality.
The current version we are using is lacking some unique features, we are upgrading to the newer version of this solution that has these features, S4 HANA.
I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has. We are going to continue to use the solution.
I rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.
Compared to Oracle, the licensing could be better.
SAP HANA is not strong like Oracle when it comes to finance. They are only strong with the logistic business project.
I have around 12 years of experience implementing SAP HANA.
It is stable.
It depends on the enterprise, but the average enterprise has 20 employees. They buy two accounts to use the SAP S4HANA. It means that on average the enterprise will buy 20% to buy the license.
So far technical support is good. If we have any problem that a local partner cannot resolve for the customer, they will write to SAP and support will help fix the problem.
The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing.
The SAP license fee is more expensive than other solutions like Oracle or Microsoft Dynamics.
I would rate SAP HANA a nine out of ten. Not a ten because of the price.
We have a lot of clients from different industries, such as factories and hospitals. We have deployed it on the cloud as well as on-premises for various clients.
All features are valuable.
They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem.
Its price could be better. It is expensive.
I have been using SAP HANA for several years. I have been using it since they launched the HANA database.
It is stable.
It is scalable. We have installed SAP HANA for around 15,000 users.
I would say they are average. Sometimes, they are not able to answer our questions, or their answers come very late after we have already resolved the issue. They should be more familiar with the product.
We used our own product, which we developed on our own. After engaging SAP, we substituted our own product with SAP HANA.
The initial setup was straightforward.
It is expensive.
I would recommend this solution. We plan to continue using this solution for our clients.
I would rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.