We basically use the solution to do all our HR management processes. That includes our payroll processes and our personal administration. We use time management as well as recruitment processes on the system.
The solution is deployed on-premises.
We basically use the solution to do all our HR management processes. That includes our payroll processes and our personal administration. We use time management as well as recruitment processes on the system.
The solution is deployed on-premises.
HCM is actually moving over to the cloud, which is Success Factors or S/4HANA. It's a better solution than the current platform because the current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions.
This is a transaction driven type of system, whereby a user actually has to know or understand a certain transaction code.
If they have no idea, they will not be able to do anything. From that perspective, there are a couple of drawbacks. The solution is of course not as flexible. It's more than an application. It was the best back then, but things have evolved and technology has evolved significantly. People want easier to work with applications.
The graphic user interface could be improved. It's not for a use of 20. I think the most improvement will be on the front-end than the back-end.
I have been using this solution for over 12 years. I am using version ECC 6.0.
SAP HCM is stable.
It is scalable. We have approximately 1,300 employees in our organization. They are using the system either directly or indirectly. Indirectly in the sense that we have the employee portal, where the employees actually use the self-service portal and can do their own things, like leave applications. Almost everyone in the organization uses the system, but of course in a different way.
Right now, we don't have any plans to increase usage in the future.
Technical support is excellent.
Initial setup was complex. On a scale of one to five, I would give it a four.
It normally takes over a year to implement these types of solutions.
We used the SAP partner for deployment. Our experience was quite good.
I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.
The current solution is phasing out. If you are purchasing it, then it shouldn't be for long-term usage. I think SAP has customers' usage up to 20 or 25 for the current platform, by which everyone needs to upgrade to their newer versions or newer applications. Otherwise, if you are planning to implement HCM in the current type of module and version, then you actually are not doing justice to yourself. I would advise that you go for Success Factors, which has a fresher look and maybe some other tools that are available.
SAP HCM helps maintain employee records, payroll, timesheet management, etc.
The tool's best feature is SAP SuccessFactors.
SAP HCM needs to improve its UI.
I have been working with the product for seven to eight years.
Oracle HCM is stable; I rate it a seven out of ten.
The solution is scalable, and my company has more than 40,000 users for it.
We inform our in-house technical team about the issues.
Positive
SAP HCM is easy to maintain, and I rate it a nine out of ten.
I am an HR Solutions Provider from SAP. My customers use the solution for many other domains such as sales and distribution, finance, material management, and plan management and maintenance.
SAP sHCM helps with the solutions my customer look for in the HR domain.
The payroll and time management features are useful.
Some reports need to be added on the time management side.
I have been using HCM for the past 15 years.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
This is an ERP product organizations use for running their HR. I'm an SAP consultant for the HCM module implementing the product for multiple organizations. We use SAP SF modules for talent management, and I am currently using SuccessFactors for work performance and goal management.
Payroll processing is my favorite HCM feature, and I like all the SuccessFactors talent modules also. SAP is making good progress on enhancements to the features in the SF modules.
The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll.
I've been using for I think four years.
I rate SAP HCM 10 out of 10.
I rate SAP technical support nine out of 10. They're always available via live expert chats whenever we get stuck.
Positive
I rate SAP HCM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. Deploying SAP HCM is easy for us, and we have experience implementing it for multiple organizations. When we first implemented HCM, we needed to spend some time studying tutorials, manuals, and knowledge bases. Now we are experienced, and we can implement any SAP process an organization needs. It's easy to adjust the configurations as needed.
I believe HCM is a little expensive, but I don't know the exact price because I'm involved with the sales team. However, I think the price must be reasonable because many organizations are migrating their current ERPs to SAP. It's excellent software, and the price is competitive.
I rate SAP HCM 10 out of 10 for the current processes we are using. It's a complete module, and we have already migrated the talent management functions to SuccessFactors.
The core modules of this solution are for personnel and payroll, which is the basic setup for any HRIS system.
SAP needs a total upgrade to the user interface. I've worked with the performance module and the objectives and goals module in HCM and they're far from being satisfying to any customer compared to what exists now with SuccessFactors.
SAP also needs to apply better practices to the talent management modules. There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules.
I have been working with this product since 2010, so about 12 years.
The solution is stable. Recently, the localization versions for different countries were increased, and that added value to the solution. We work in Egypt and we spent a lot of time working with the international version until the localized version was released, so it's a plus to have increased localization of the product.
Scaling is just a matter of changing the license and there aren't any problems with that. My current customer using this solution has about 5,000 employees. SAP HCM is suitable for enterprise companies.
Sometimes the tech support is good and they have quick responses, and sometimes we face delays in the response. I don't know what it depends on, but each case is different. I'm not always satisfied and I'm not always dissatisfied.
I haven't faced any problems when implementing HCM. Usually, we don't implement the entire package. The personnel administration and payroll modules take two to three months to install and implement.
The pricing is not reasonable at all. That's why the product needs to be used by an enterprise, because the pricing is not okay for medium or small companies.
SuccessFactors is trending now because it's more user-friendly and more rapid for all the advanced modules, such as the recruiting performance, and SAP HCM is not satisfying to customers anymore.
My advice would be to stick to the core modules on SAP HCM, because it is not the best choice for talent management modules.
I would rate the product as an eight out of ten.
We use the solution as an ERP system for enterprise business.
The solution has the best customization features. It provides good data management features and integration with enterprise resource management platforms.
The solution's reporting feature could have customization options. Also, its dashboard features need to be better compared to Oracle.
We have been using the solution for seven years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is challenging to scale compared to Oracle, which is easier to understand. Our organization has over 100 solutions users from the material management, finance, and networking departments.
We have our IT support department for technical queries. So, we never directly contact the solution's technical support team.
The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming. Also, we need to hire resources for customized reports apart from maintenance.
The solution is more expensive than Oracle.
In comparison with the solution, Oracle is more cost-effective. Also, it has a more straightforward process for customizing reports based on our requirements. We can create reports with customized designs using it.
I recommend the solution to others and rate it an eight out of ten. It provides a complete ERP system.
We begin using this solution when we hire an employee. We input all of their family details, bank details, and the wage we decide on during the interview. We enter all of their initial information in SAP, then we generate their new employee number.
I think that it's a very powerful tool for maintaining your company data. When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click.
We input all of our workflows into SAP to make our work environment better. All of our new projects and new policies will be implemented in SAP. It would be very helpful for our company if a new version was released with the ability to contain all of the things that we have newly introduced in our company.
I have been using this solution for 12-13 years.
This solution is stable.
600-700 people use this solution in our company. The supply chain management department, internal audit department, IT, and the administration department use SAP HCM.
I would rate the technical support as a five out of five. With the support team, you can easily satisfy your clients.
We have an annual license for this solution, and the price depends on the number of users.
My company chose this solution because it is very important and famous all over the world, and its reporting tool is very good. I would recommend it, and my advice to someone considering this solution is that it is a very user-friendly software. I would rate it as a ten out of ten.
SAP HCM has totally integrated our work. We left a manual environment, and much of our work is now automated with this solution.
We use this solution for all of the organization's HR needs.
Most of it is similar to Oracle HCM.
They have some interesting features in the learning space.
The extensibility that SuccessFactors talks about is when we are required to create an add-on solution or a small application, that could be developed within the ecosystem of the Oracle HCM itself, and then integrate it easily.
This is a feature that we can look forward to seeing in SAP as well.
The extensibility of the integration could be improved.
I have a lot of experience with SAP. I have been working with SAP for nine years.
We are using the latest version.
I have no issues with the stability of SAP HCM.
SAP HCM is a scalable product.
We have approximately 32,000 users in our organization who use this solution.
Technical support is a strong team.
The initial setup was straightforward. It was good.
Licensing fees are paid yearly.
I would rate SAP HCM an eight out of ten.
