Sophos Cyberoam UTM Reviews

We primarily use the solution for unified threat management. We basically use it for firewall and network management. 

The solution is easy to use. It's simple to set up and configure. 

It puts you in control of your infrastructure. 

The reporting features are very good. It offers very good visibility.

The solution provides very helpful alerts. 

It offers decent pricing. 

The solution is stable.

The product can scale to a certain extent. We haven't hit our limit.

We do not have any specific features in mind for improvement, however, we'd always like more features. 

The solution could be cheaper. 

I've used the solution for five years or so. I've used it for a while. 

We've always had very good stability. We've never had a problem with the stability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

I have not explored the scalability. It is tied to the hardware. The unit we have would support zero to 500 people. After that, you would need to get a new appliance However, we've never exceeded that appliance limit. If we ever exceed the appliance, we'd look to see what other options are available in the market. Most products in the market are quite comparable to Sophos. 

We have used online Sophos support. However, we haven't used it too much. We haven't had many issues with the solution. 

The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. It is not overly complex. The configuration process is very easy.

We do get setup support and training, which makes the process very simple. 

Our appliance is on-premises. However, there is a cloud-based console that connects to the physical device. 

The product has its own deployment support that comes with it. If you are a new client, technical support will assist with the setup.

The setup itself is pretty fast. It doesn't take more than one hour. Of course, there is a few tweaks that may take a week or two to set up. Some companies may need additional services configured.

We have local support in Kenya and can get help if we need assistance. 

We do not specifically look at the ROI. 

We do an annual subscription. 

The pricing is comparable to others. There is an initial cost for changing a solution, so it is chapter to just renew the subscription rather than jumping to a new solution. 

For the most part, the cost is okay. They are a bit on the higher side, and we'd always like it to be a bit lower. 

We are using the latest version of the solution, although the hardware might be a bit older. 

This is a pretty nice product, and I would recommend it. It doesn't require a lot of effort when it comes to setup and management.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

I primarily use the product to implement secure VPN connections and manage bandwidth in various organizational environments, focusing on network security and efficiency.

The platform has significantly enhanced our network security posture by providing robust bandwidth management and reliable VPN capabilities. However, occasional hardware-related issues have necessitated upgrades.

The product's most valuable features include comprehensive bandwidth management and secure end-to-end VPN connections, crucial for maintaining efficient and secure network operations.

They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance.

I've been using Sophos Cyberoam UTM since around 2007.

The technical support services generally meet expectations, but we occasionally encounter delays in response times.

The initial setup process was straightforward.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM an eight out of ten. 

We use it as a major enterprise device, using its capabilities as a firewall, web, application filter, and routing. We also use it for VPN connectivity and other basic features like IPS.

It has helped us manage the bandwidth, regulate usage, monitor visited sites, and control application downloads. This has enabled us to conserve our bandwidth effectively. It is one of the major benefits.

In Sophos Cyberoam UTM, the most valuable features are web and application filtering, routing functionalities, and VPN. These features are extremely important to us.

The data support response time should be improved. It is generally lengthy. When logging a complaint, it often takes considerable time to receive attention. Improving support in terms of response time would be beneficial.

I have been using this solution since 2017. I am presently using the most recent version of Sophos Cyberoam UTM, which is version 20.0.

It’s very stable. We have not had any issues.

The solution is scalable. Thus far, we haven't encountered any challenges related to the system load. It provides the flexibility to handle our requirements smoothly.

One of the reasons to opt for Sophos Cyberoam UTM was influenced by its impressive features and capabilities. The user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) was another attraction. We needed something simple and user-friendly. We wanted to eliminate the need for extensive command-line operations, as often required with other solutions like Cisco Firewall. 

We also wanted a tool that could enhance the visibility into our network utilization and monitor traffic in real time. Moreover, Sophos Cyberoam UTM's web application filter feature was also an attraction.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment was primarily conducted to assess the organization's requirements and objectives. Initially, our main goal in selecting this device was to have control over our internet usage. We performed a user acceptance test, created various use cases, and evaluated what capabilities Sophos Cyberoam could offer. Once we were satisfied with the results, we proceeded with the deployment.

Our initial actions involved configuring the system settings and determining which websites users should access and when. For instance, during work hours from 8 AM to 4 PM, we restricted access to social media sites and YouTube. This helped us optimize internet speed. The first steps included registering the device and configuring its basic settings. Over time, we continued to implement and refine policies based on the evolving needs of the network.

The deployment took approximately two or three days. Initially, the vendor encountered challenges, possibly due to a skill gap. Subsequently, an expert from Lagos had to intervene and complete the deployment. This extended the deployment timeframe to about three days. Maintenance involves renewing our license and conducting firmware updates. Whenever a new release for the device is available, we ensure to apply it. These routine tasks constitute the core of our maintenance activities.

We had a vendor join me in the deployment. We also had an expert come in when we faced difficulties with implementation.

The product's pricing is a challenge. The recent subscription renewal has raised concerns within our organization because it is becoming too high for us. I'm apprehensive about our ability to sustain these increased costs. I'm used to the device and would like to continue using it. However, justifying the renewal may become difficult for me in the future.

We have worked with Cisco Firewall and Netgear Firewall.

In terms of features and user-friendliness, the solution is good. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The use cases for the solution are different. It is used by petrochemical companies, government companies, universities, private companies, hospitals, and hotels.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a very good solution for SMB companies and can handle their many requirements. The product is a simple and user-friendly UTM that can handle accounting, reporting, firewall, IPS, and antivirus for industries. It is a good solution for accounting and managing users.

The solution should improve its scalability because it cannot support enterprise networks.

Cyberoam was discontinued five years ago, and they have no new features. Sophos continues their products under the XG brand name. I would like to see Sophos XG features included in Cyberoam.

I have been using Sophos Cyberoam UTM for ten years.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a very very stable solution.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM ten out of ten for stability.

Our clients are small and medium businesses.

I rate the scalability a five out of ten.

The solution’s technical support is very very good. They have online chats and remote support.

Positive

The initial setup was very very simple. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten.

The solution’s deployment takes one to two days.

The product has a very low price compared to other solutions.

I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.

I have installed Sophos UTM for more than 100 companies in many countries. The XG model has good features and it continues with Cyberoam features. We can find new features in Sophos XG for Cyberoam.

The solution is not good for current times. We cannot find Cyberoam products in the market. It is discontinued. People should buy Sophos XGS.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I used Sophos Cyberoam UTM as a captive portal and user management software. I used it internally for internet usage.

I found that the best feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is reporting. Its reporting feature is excellent, fast, and easy to prep and launch. Reporting is also straightforward to do in Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM has room for improvement in specific rules-based objects and redesign.

The solution also needs to improve in adding rules and policies, including renewing and finding policies.

The Sophos team should make Sophos Cyberoam UTM policies and rules better and more useful than the old ones because that can be difficult and confusing sometimes. For example, adding policies or rules can be confusing, and that can be risky.

To improve Sophos Cyberoam UTM, Sophos should add an IPS or IDS signature feature in the current plans offered to customers.

Upgrading or patching the solution can be slow, so that's another area for improvement.

In the next version of Sophos Cyberoam UTM, I want it to have an appliance management feature, similar to what's in FortiManager, where you can connect all appliances and manage the devices because that would be easier in terms of reporting.

In my old project, the company used Sophos Cyberoam UTM for five or six years. I last used it one year ago.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a stable solution.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is scalable, but there seems to be a tiny problem when integrating the older version of the solution.

My company has virtual appliances on the network, and in enterprise networks, you want to launch a ComNet hook or everything at the cores rather than patches. It would be best if you first thought about scalability in the microservices. If you have software-defined appliances to launch in that infrastructure and integrate that with the infrastructure, that would be very useful, so you don't need an appliance.

On the other hand, if an appliance is required in your network, you sometimes don't want to use public or cloud services, and the solution should be okay with that or should still work.

We don't use the technical support for Sophos Cyberoam UTM that much. We only use support to get data, and they're very good in that area.

I found the initial setup for Sophos Cyberoam UTM straightforward.

Deploying the product takes one to two days, and it's ready for work. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a straightforward appliance. It's not complicated. If you have the knowledge in configuring or designing the network and the basics of the file log, you can launch Sophos Cyberoam UTM and run it for your network in one or two days.

You get ROI from Sophos Cyberoam UTM. In the security world, measuring ROI is not very simple. You want to get the ROI for the appliance. You want to pay for that security, so you want to get KPIs such as ROCE. You want to get security tools because you won't know how much threat could get into your network, and then when the threat gets in, how much damage would that cause your business? This is why you pay a fee for a security solution.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good investment for your business, whether small or massive, with one hundred to three hundred employees because the solution can help you avoid the considerable damage security threats and risks can do to your business. You can even calculate your current ROCE before the problem even happens.

Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. Usually, my customers want to launch Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually.

We evaluated Fortinet solutions such as FortiGate, FortiWeb, and FortiAnalyzer, which are good solutions for important transactions. We evaluated them recently and planned to implement them as we grow.

I used version 7.1 of Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

Fixing and patching, or maintaining Sophos Cyberoam UTM, is a slow process. It's slower than FortiGate and F5. F5 and Fortigate have faster patching and UIs, including new features every month or two, versus Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

You will only need a few staff to deploy Sophos Cyberoam UTM, but it still depends on the work, the scope of work, and the network. One to two staff will be enough to manage and maintain Sophos Cyberoam UTM if it's an easy deployment. For a middle-sized network, you'd need more staff.

In the largest network of the company, three hundred people used Sophos Cyberoam UTM. Usage-wise, my company increases it whenever there's company growth.

I recommend the solution to SMBs because it's easy to manage.

My rating for Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ten out of ten.

We are connected through Cyberoam so you have to pass through Cyberoam to connect to our network. 

The solution is on-prem. It's basically on the network.

We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that.

I don't know whether this will be included in an upgrade, but I would like to get the user utility, like seeing where the users are using more of the data. 

Sometimes there are heavy downloads, which I'm not able to track. If I can get that information, that would be more useful from the IT point of view.

I have been using this product for almost two and a half years.

The solution is stable. In two and a half years, we haven't faced any problems.

For maintenance, we have the support company person who visits around twice a month.

We have not explored the scalability very much, so I will give it a 7 out of 10 as far as connectivity or support. As an IT manager, I don't get the complete report of what users are doing, so it would be great to have that also. That would be much better from an organization point of view in case my users are doing something wrong.

Usually, I have 25 licenses, so we have increased that number by 10 this year and now we have 35 licenses.

Initial setup was straightforward. Implementation was not very difficult because we were renovating our office structure.

At the initial stage, we decided that once we were putting the new structure in, we would go through Cyberoam, so we connected through a dealer. They came and did the complete setup. It was quite smooth. It took around two to three days to do the complete setup and it was up and running. There was not much of a hassle there because they managed it.

None of my employees were in that area where the setup was done. The team was all alone to complete the setup. Once the setup was done, we just connected to the network and everything was up and running. It was faster. It took around four to seven days to do the complete setup and set up the users.

We just use the standard package.

I was using a different product, and we were facing a lot of problems. The users were not able to open some sites. They were having issues. The sites were getting blocked and all, but with the Cyberoam, there is security without much hassle.

We had a dry run and our vendors suggested that we buy Cyberoam. They gave us a test demo, we were satisfied with the product, and we purchased it afterwards.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10. 

My advice is that it's a good product if you're looking for security without much hassle. For other products, the maintenance is too high and you need a resource to manage that. With Cyberoam, you hardly need to manage it once the setup is done correctly.

We use the tool for network security, covering web servers, exchange servers, and users' internet proxies.

I found that the solution's interface is user-friendly, and the web protection is good.

SD-WAN should be included in the tool.

I have been using this solution for over five years.

The tool is highly stable.

The product is scalable.

The technical support is good.

Positive

We haven’t used a different solution. We chose Sophos Cyberoam UTM because their focus on security research is higher compared to other brands. They consistently introduce new features. It's an all-in-one solution with antivirus, EDR, wireless protection, and web protection integrated into one box.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took less than three months.

The product is worth the money.

The solution’s pricing is average.

Nowadays, advanced solutions with SD-WAN are becoming essential. These features are in higher demand for daily use. The solution requires only this improvement. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use a lot of Sophos Cyberoam UTM's features depending on the customer's needs. The overall solution is good. In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features.

The solution's pricing could be a problem for some small businesses.

I have worked as a reseller with Sophos Cyberoam UTM for ten years.

The stability of the solution is very good.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM a nine out of ten for stability.

The solution scales very well for us. We have 20 clients using Sophos Cyberoam UTM. Our customers are usually small and medium-sized businesses.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM an eight or nine out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s technical support is very good because we have good connections to Sophos.

Positive

Since we are technicians, Sophos Cyberoam UTM's initial setup was quite easy for us.

Depending on the difficulty and customer requirements, the solution's deployment could take a few hours or a couple of days.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM ten out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The solution's pricing depends on the customer size. We have small and medium customers, and it's not so easy for them to finance this product. Although it's not a very cheap solution, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is in a good price range considering its feature set. Considering what you can solve with the solution and what you get for your money, the solution has valuable pricing.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM's pricing seven out of ten.

The primary solution in the future will be the Sophos XGS firewall solution that will replace Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

Overall, I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM a nine out of ten.