No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
it_user345507 - PeerSpot reviewer
Program Manager at LS3 Technologies, Inc.
Consultant
Dec 6, 2015
We chose it because you can automate the creation of endpoint systems and create custom connectors. While tech support is sometimes quick, it's often been slower than ideal.
Pros and Cons
  • "Segregation duties is another great benefit. It has allowed us to automate the process of creating user accounts really well."
  • "They get us answers, but often they’re too slow."

What is most valuable?

The ability to easily manage user accounts is great.

How has it helped my organization?

Segregation duties is another great benefit. It has allowed us to automate the process of creating user accounts really well.

What needs improvement?

I can't think of any additional features I'd like to see, as it does everything we need.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using it for around two years.

Buyer's Guide
Symantec Siteminder
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Siteminder. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It’s been very stable so far and hasn't gone down at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It’s scaled up as far as we've needed so far. We're a midsize customer with about 2000 users, and it's been totally fine.

How are customer service and support?

They get us answers, but often they’re too slow. It could take us as long as two weeks to get the answers we need. While sometimes it's quick, it has often been slower than ideal.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We’ve always been using this, and beforehand we used a homegrown solution. We switched because it had insufficient automation and our homegrown solution was just too inflexible.

How was the initial setup?

I wasn't involved in the initial setup.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I always look for quality of services. CA have been OK so far, but not a slam dunk. We had one problem where they took forever to get back with us, but they eventually solved the problem fast.

My company also looked at IBM and Oracle, and I don't know why they chose CA.

What other advice do I have?

Check how many endpoint systems it supports. We chose this because of the amount of endpoints, you can automate the creation of endpoint systems, and it has the ability to create custom connectors. It supports the connectors out of the box and this is faster and easier than doing it yourself.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user346296 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Technical Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 6, 2015
With just a single ID, people don't have to remember multiple user IDs and passwords. We've seen some bugginess when we want to incorporate a new feature, customization, or technology.
Pros and Cons
  • "The features most valuable to us are its usability, the way you can customize it, and its supportability."
  • "It may be a good product, but I'd advise staying away from customizing it."

Valuable Features:

The features most valuable to us are its usability, the way you can customize it, and its supportability.

Improvements to My Organization:

From an organizational perspective, it helps us to maintain IDs and it enhances the user experience. With just a single ID, people don't have to really remember multiple user IDs and passwords. So, it's a tool to enhance the user experience.

Room for Improvement:

I'd like to see less issues when we implement new customizations or technologies. Being able to customize is something we'd like to do, but it needs improvement to allow that to happen without issue.

Stability Issues:

It tends to be buggy, though not to a high level. Where we have seen most of the problems is when we want to incorporate a new feature or when we want to implement some customization or when we want to implement a new technology. During those times, we have seen it to be buggy.

Scalability Issues:

Like the stability, we have had some issues with bringing in new integrations or customizing it for our need. It's been a journey figuring out how to scale it.

Initial Setup:

I wasn't involved in the setup.

Other Advice:

It may be a good product, but I'd advise staying away from customizing it.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Siteminder
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Siteminder. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user344034 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Security at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 25, 2015
It enables security and single sign-on to applications deployed on thick clients, web based applications, and ERP systems.
Pros and Cons
  • "The product greatly facilitates a centralized identity and access management system."
  • "There is a considerable improvement in the product from previous versions, but a few items we feel need a little attention are the web agent installation process and steps – as it behaves differently on the same OS."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features for us are:

  • Access management
  • Role-based authorization
  • Identity provisioning
  • Identity federation

How has it helped my organization?

The product greatly facilitates a centralized identity and access management system. It provides seamless navigation across different applications in addition to enabling the flexibility to personalize contents based on user attributes without additional requests.

It enables security and single sign-on to applications deployed on thick clients, web based applications, and ERP systems.

It easily integrates with third-party service providers by enabling federation gateway capabilities.

What needs improvement?

There is a considerable improvement in the product from previous versions, but a few items we feel need a little attention are the web agent installation process and steps – as it behaves differently on the same OS.

Improvements are also needed in the password policy template customization and it's missing the required documentation to do it.

The knowledge base needs to be enhanced as there are very limited resources on the web while debugging issues.

For how long have I used the solution?

Avaya has used SiteMinder 12.5s2 and IdentityMinder for eight years. We also use the following products -

CA Secure Proxy Server – 12.52

GovernanceMinder 12.6 – New to Avaya; in initial deployment
PIM R12.8 New to Avaya; in initial deployment

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

CA Single Sign-On – No issues encountered during deployment.

CA Identity Manager – No issues encountered during deployment.

CA Privileged Identity Manager – Few issues encountered during deployment, mainly related to resolution of DNS entries for Active Directory.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far no issues encountered with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

So far no issues encountered with stability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

It's very good.

Technical Support:

It's very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution was used.

What about the implementation team?

It was a mix of internal Avaya and an IdmLogic team.

CA Single Sign-On was deployed by an internal Avaya team and CA Identity Manager was deployed by the IDMLogic team.

A CA team was instrumental in deploying CA Privileged Management solution.

CA and IDM Logic have very good expertise in implementation of these products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated, it's just upgrades.

What other advice do I have?

Have a significant knowledge of the applications transitioning, as it requires interfacing with these products to ensure proper adoption. Have a roadmap to integrate identity and access management into your organization.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Middleware specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 25, 2015
Its single sign-on feature allows us to log in to a variety of different applications, but it's difficult to manage and has an outdate UI.
Pros and Cons
  • "It provides a secure interface and single sign-on to a variety of different applications."
  • "It's difficult to configure, and has a very old and challenging user interface."

Valuable Features

  • Security configuration
  • Flexibility

Improvements to My Organization

It provides a secure interface and single sign-on to a variety of different applications.

Room for Improvement

It's difficult to configure, and has a very old and challenging user interface.

Use of Solution

I managed it for approximately three years.

Deployment Issues

No issues encountered.

Stability Issues

No issues encountered.

Customer Service and Technical Support

Customer Service:

It's reasonable, the support does respond within a reasonable time frame, but it can be very difficult to troubleshoot any issue.

Technical Support:

It's reasonable. The support is not the quickest to respond and does not have a mature process in terms of what logs must be gathered, and what to gather before raising a case.

Initial Setup

It was complex. There are a number of concepts you have to understand to use the product, and the concepts are mostly specific to this particular product.

Implementation Team

CA provided assistance with augmentation of the existing solution, they provided quite a good level of support during the project.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer958518 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect & Technical Director at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Aug 31, 2024
Used for single sign-on (SSO) authentication and facilitates third-party integrations
Pros and Cons
  • "Symantec Siteminder has simplified user access for our customers from user login to their web applications."
  • "The support team could work on their response time and overall competence."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used for single sign-on (SSO) authentication.

What is most valuable?

Symantec Siteminder has simplified user access for our customers from user login to their web applications.

What needs improvement?

The support team could work on their response time and overall competence.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Symantec Siteminder for ten years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would recommend the solution to both smaller and larger companies.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's pricing is competitive.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the solution to other users. The solution is easy to use, and our company helps customers implement the product. The solution's centralized policy management provides a simple GUI for the users or administrators to use. We have the right skill set to do third-party integrations very easily.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Symantec Siteminder Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Symantec Siteminder Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.