Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo

Top 10 WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Alternatives

Vendor: WithSecure
5.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Snyk, and Darktrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) surpasses its competitors by providing real-time risk analysis, automated vulnerability detection, and comprehensive threat intelligence integration, ensuring robust protection and enhanced security posture for businesses.

WithSecure Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WithSecure, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Wiz offers an advantage with competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, WithSecure XM provides comprehensive features and advanced risk assessment tools. Tech buyers might choose Wiz for lower costs or WithSecure XM for its in-depth analytics and long-term strategic value.
Wiz offers a straightforward initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) involves a more intricate setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz offers a straightforward initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) involves a more intricate setup process.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Snyk offers intuitive integration with developer environments, ensuring seamless application testing and quick deployment. In comparison, WithSecure XM provides extensive threat management and robust vulnerability assessments. A tech buyer might choose Snyk for ease of use or WithSecure XM for comprehensive security features.
Snyk offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) can have higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Snyk offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) can have higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive configuration requirements.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection and autonomous response for real-time security, appealing to those seeking immediate insights. In comparison, WithSecure Elements XM stands out for asset exposure visibility and comprehensive risk assessment, offering effective management for vulnerability-conscious buyers.
Darktrace presents a higher setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM), making WithSecure a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace presents a higher setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM), making WithSecure a more budget-friendly option.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers cost-effective threat intelligence and real-time monitoring, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, WithSecure Elements XM provides comprehensive risk visibility and automation, appealing to organizations seeking thorough security management at a higher cost.
FortiCNAPP setup costs are notably higher, emphasizing initial investment, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) offers a more budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP setup costs are notably higher, emphasizing initial investment, while WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) offers a more budget-friendly approach.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.3 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) offers cost-effective initial setup and seamless deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks justifies its premium pricing with advanced analytics and intelligent automation, attracting organizations seeking sophisticated threat intelligence and robust incident management capabilities.
WithSecure Elements XM offers a lower setup cost, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks might involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements XM offers a lower setup cost, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks might involve higher initial expenses.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
WithSecure Elements appeals with its cost-effective approach and robust threat detection. In comparison, Upwind's detailed analytics and integration make it attractive for strategic initiatives. WithSecure's straightforward deployment contrasts with Upwind's personalized service, highlighting diverse priorities for tech buyers.
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) has a moderate setup cost, whereas Upwind's setup cost is significantly higher.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) has a moderate setup cost, whereas Upwind's setup cost is significantly higher.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)