Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
BizTalk Server Logo

BizTalk Server Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

What is BizTalk Server?

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.
Get the BizTalk Server Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server, Camunda, Control-M and more!
BizTalk Server is the #8 ranked solution in top Business-to-Business Middleware solutions and #14 ranked solution in top Process Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give BizTalk Server an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. BizTalk Server is most commonly compared to Camunda: BizTalk Server vs Camunda. BizTalk Server is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
BizTalk Server
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured BizTalk Server reviews

Read more reviews

BizTalk Server mindshare

Product category:
Business-to-Business Middleware
As of August 2025, the mindshare of BizTalk Server in the Business-to-Business Middleware category stands at 4.8%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BizTalk Server4.8%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services15.7%
webMethods.io11.1%
Other68.4%
Business-to-Business Middleware

PeerResearch reports based on BizTalk Server reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness-to-Business MiddlewareAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonBizTalk Server vs MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonBizTalk Server vs SAP Process OrchestrationAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonBizTalk Server vs webMethods.ioAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.1N/A89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Control-M4.3N/A98%127 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

BizTalk Server is valued for its orchestrations enabling sophisticated business processes, adaptable transformation using XSLT, and integration with Visual Studio. It excels in messaging, routing, and secure AS2 communications. The various adapters enhance connectivity with systems like SAP and SQL Server, offering flexibility and stability. Users appreciate BizTalk's low-code ease for beginners, comprehensive workflow automation, and the ability to manage complex data mappings and transactions efficiently across platforms.
  • "The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."
  • "The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."
  • "BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

Room for Improvement

BizTalk Server needs improvement in debugging, performance, and XML handling without additional settings. It requires simpler deployment processes and better monitoring and message tracking. Users report scalability issues and lack flexibility in handling schemas. The transition towards cloud options like Azure Logic Apps indicates a need for cloud integration support. API management and cost-related challenges exist compared to other technologies. Enhancements in administrative support and message archiving are also needed, indicating a shift in user preferences toward modern platforms.
  • "I didn't find anything particularly valuable in BizTalk Server. It didn't help me, and we are moving away from BizTalk Server to a new platform."
  • "BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages."
  • "Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

ROI

Large-scale industries find return on investment from BizTalk Server to be positive, especially with an on-premise setup. In contrast, small and medium-sized businesses favor cloud solutions for more cost-effective operations through pay-as-you-go services. Despite its decade-long service, some still plan to transition from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods due to enhanced features. Others refrain from commenting on the return. Overall, users acknowledge positive outcomes, yet consider alternatives for future needs.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating BizTalk Server report varied pricing experiences. Some find the pricing structure reasonable, while others consider it expensive compared to Azure, which offers more flexible consumption-based or subscription models. Licensing costs depend on transactional volume and security needs. BizTalk requires upfront licensing, making it less cost-effective for some, especially if features are underutilized. On-premises deployment takes longer than cloud solutions, and careful evaluation is needed to ensure the investment is justified.
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."
  • "It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

Popular Use Cases

BizTalk Server is primarily used for system integration, acting as middleware to connect ERP, CRM, and other systems. Users employ it for electronic data interchange (EDI), message transformation, and orchestrations. It supports various industries with capabilities like Business Rules Engine (BRE), Business Activity Monitoring (BAM), and multiple adapters. Organizations often implement BizTalk Server for handling large data volumes, ensuring secure user access, and facilitating communication between source and destination systems.

Service and Support

BizTalk Server receives praise for its documentation and online resources. Companies rarely engage directly with technical support, relying instead on strong documentation or external consulting teams. Support quality appears varied, often dependent on service agreements, with experiences ranging from efficient resolutions to required follow-ups. Microsoft support remains available, noted for competent engineers and active tech communities providing valuable insights.

Deployment

BizTalk Server's initial setup can range from straightforward to complex, depending on configurations and required integrations. Many experience an easy setup due to Microsoft's documentation, but others note challenges with multi-load environments and dependencies on IT teams. Though installation can be quick if SQL Server and Visual Studio are pre-installed, some find the process lengthy. Continuous integration and continuous deployment practices simplify deployment, transforming it into a seamless process after initial configuration.

Scalability

BizTalk Server appears to handle scalability differently for various users. Some report no issues and find it easy to scale by adding servers, while others encounter performance challenges, especially with increased messages or complex format conversions. Some rate scalability moderately and consider clustering a possibility. Experiences vary, with many users relying on its features but considering alternative platforms due to architecture or on-premises limitations. Cost is a factor, especially during initial implementation.

Stability

Users report BizTalk Server is stable, with some experiencing it running for years without rebooting. While it handles small transactions efficiently, it struggles with large datasets. Some encounter host issues during large-scale integrations. Most users rate its stability between eight and nine out of ten. Although stable, it faces obsolescence due to cost and cloud limitations, prompting migration to newer platforms. Some users express anticipation for improvements from Microsoft.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our BizTalk Server Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business49
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise142
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Government
5%
Media Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
University
2%
Maritime Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Agriculture
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%

Compare BizTalk Server with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about BizTalk Server

BizTalk Server customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Related questions

  • 85
What are the main cons/pros to choosing Biztalk Server as an ESB platform?
  • 31
When evaluating Business-to-Business Middleware, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 2,341
What is the difference between API and middleware?
  • 15
Can anyone provide feedback about Business-to-Business Middleware solutions?
  • 18
Why is Business-to-Business Middleware important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Business-to-Business Middleware
Process Automation

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Camunda vs BizTalk Server Logo
Camunda vs BizTalk Server
Control-M vs BizTalk Server Logo
Control-M vs BizTalk Server
Appian vs BizTalk Server Logo
Appian vs BizTalk Server
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server
Pega Platform vs BizTalk Server Logo
Pega Platform vs BizTalk Server
webMethods.io vs BizTalk Server Logo
webMethods.io vs BizTalk Server
Bizagi vs BizTalk Server Logo
Bizagi vs BizTalk Server
IBM BPM vs BizTalk Server Logo
IBM BPM vs BizTalk Server
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server
SAP Process Orchestration vs BizTalk Server Logo
SAP Process Orchestration vs BizTalk Server
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server Logo
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server
IBM B2B Integrator vs BizTalk Server Logo
IBM B2B Integrator vs BizTalk Server
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs BizTalk Server Logo
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs BizTalk Server
Oracle BPEL vs BizTalk Server Logo
Oracle BPEL vs BizTalk Server
Infor ION vs BizTalk Server Logo
Infor ION vs BizTalk Server
See all alternatives
 
BizTalk Server Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution3.0I've used BizTalk Server for over 12 years, but due to scalability issues and limited cloud features, we're transitioning to IBM WebMethods, which offers better integration options, though BizTalk's business rule engine was helpful during its use.
Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner4.0I primarily use BizTalk Server for EDI, valuing its connectivity and workflow features for system integration. Improvements are needed in message tracking and scalability. Although sometimes complex, it effectively automates processes, and I deploy it on Microsoft Azure.
Senior Analyst at Sword Group4.0BizTalk Server is a reliable on-premise middleware used in industries like manufacturing and oil. It excels in secure AS2 communication and data routing. However, the update process is cumbersome, and small businesses may prefer cloud solutions due to ROI considerations.
Software Engineer at Shell5.0I use BizTalk Server primarily for connecting systems and message transformation. It's reliable and stable, but being on-premises, it's limited compared to Azure's cloud capabilities. Despite improvements, companies are gradually transitioning to cloud-based solutions.
Integration Developer at Mediterranean Shipping Company4.0We primarily use BizTalk Server in the shipping industry for electronic data interchange, valuing its code integration. However, improvements are needed in monitoring, logging, and support functionalities. Our choice was influenced by a preference for Microsoft products.
ManagerManager at Capgemini3.5I migrated BizTalk applications to Azure, utilizing BizTalk as middleware for data transformation. It's effective with XML transactions but struggles with Canonical Schema and lacks deployment simplicity. Azure Logic Apps, with its enhanced features, is often preferred.
Development Team Lead at a media company with 51-200 employees3.5I use BizTalk for system integration, as it's more reliable and faster than Azure Logic Apps, with no timeout issues. However, it lacks native cloud support and is expensive. Transitioning to Logic Apps or ADA Logix may be necessary.
Telecom R&D Practice Manager at Dataart2.5BizTalk Server is primarily used for system integration and message conversion. Its integration with Visual Studio is valuable, but performance is lacking, especially with large message volumes. Open-source solutions like Kafka may offer better alternatives for integration systems.