Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortify Software Security Center Logo

Fortify Software Security Center Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Fortify Software Security Center?

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
Get the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center, Checkmarx One, OpenText Core Application Security and more!
Fortify Software Security Center is the #28 ranked solution in AST tools. PeerSpot users give Fortify Software Security Center an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Fortify Software Security Center is most commonly compared to Checkmarx One: Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One. Fortify Software Security Center is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 17% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Get the category report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured Fortify Software Security Center reviews

Read more reviews

Fortify Software Security Center mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category stands at 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortify Software Security Center0.4%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)22.1%
Checkmarx One10.0%
Other67.5%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Fortify Software Security Center's valuable features include reporting for viewing issue lists, importing reports into dashboards, and customizable tools for testing vulnerabilities against industry standards like OWASP Top Ten and CVE. The platform facilitates collaboration through Fortify audit workbench and a module for sharing ideas. Macro recording for testing multi-factor authentication, issue explanations with resolution suggestions, and CI/CD integration for daily security testing and code quality improvements through continuous deployment and automatic scanning are appreciated.
  • "I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."
  • "The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."
  • "Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."

Room for Improvement

Fortify Software Security Center faces issues with integration and false positives. Implementation is difficult, and end-user comfort needs enhancement. Technical support is slow and lacks multiple communication channels like WhatsApp. Documentation clarity and report saving options require attention. The dashboard should be simplified. Customization efforts for the overlap feature can be costly. Dataset views, trend analysis, and data correlation features are desired. Users hope newer versions will address some of these concerns.
  • "I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."
  • "Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
  • "Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

Pricing

Enterprise users expressed mixed experiences regarding the cost of Fortify Software Security Center. Some found it fair and competitive, appreciating its scalability and service level. However, others deemed it expensive, especially compared to local alternatives. Licensing verification initially posed challenges but improved with negotiated adjustments.
  • "As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily utilize Fortify Software Security Center for application security testing. They deploy it on-premises to ensure internal application security, perform critical analysis, and manage scan results. This software aggregates DAS and SAS data, providing intuitive dashboards for customizing results. It connects to sensors and controllers for data aggregation, assisting in result auditing. Users apply it for scanning applications to detect issues and apply necessary fixes, analyzing products and source code for potential violations.

Service and Support

Fortify Software Security Center's customer service has mixed feedback. Many users report slow response times from technical support and unclear documentation, rating it poorly. Some experience helpful assistance, especially since Micro Focus's acquisition by OpenText, noting improved support channels, community forums, and a dedicated portal for direct communication. While some users mention difficulties with ticket responses, others appreciate the professional services and increased support options.

Deployment

Fortify Software Security Center's initial setup can be challenging, particularly with integration and inadequate support. Deployment varied from a few weeks to six months, depending on experience level and technical proficiency. Some find it straightforward with excellent documentation, although technical expertise is needed for prerequisites like Java JDK installation. Setup ratings are mixed, ranging from four to five out of ten. Installation itself can take as little as one or two hours.

Scalability

Fortify Software Security Center supports easy scalability when sufficient licenses are available, noted by multiple entities. Some describe adding sensors and controllers as straightforward, while others find scaling difficult due to multiple components. Typically, the platform meets its users’ needs without employing its full capacity. Ratings vary, with entities highlighting that usage is largely limited to security teams. Scalability assessments range, showing mixed sentiments about its flexibility in a broader implementation.

Stability

Users express confidence in the stability of Fortify Software Security Center, highlighting it as reliable and capable. While some users rate the stability between seven and eight out of ten, others acknowledge its use by leading US banks and military institutions. Although the implementation process may present challenges, users find no issues with stability in practice. The general feedback indicates satisfaction with the platform's performance.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Retailer
6%
Individual & Family Service
4%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
University
2%
Construction Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Comms Service Provider
1%

Compare Fortify Software Security Center with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Fortify Software Security Center

Fortify Software Security Center was previously known as Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect.

Fortify Software Security Center customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Related questions

  • 11
What Application Security Solution Do You Use That Is DevOps Friendly?
  • 16
Which is the most comprehensive open source Web Security Testing tool?
  • 68
What is the best Application Security Testing platform?
  • 9
When evaluating Application Security Testing, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 23
SAST vs. DAST: Which is better for application security testing?
  • 34
What tools do you rely on for building a DevSecOps pipeline?
  • 40
What does the Log4j/Log4Shell vulnerability mean for your company?
  • 42
Checkmarx or Veracode. Which should we choose?
  • 64
What are your recommended automated penetration testing tools?
  • 22
What are the OWASP top 10 in 2020?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center
OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center
HCL AppScan vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
HCL AppScan vs Fortify Software Security Center
Semgrep vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Semgrep vs Fortify Software Security Center
See all alternatives
 
Fortify Software Security Center Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Principal Technical Consultant at EOH5.0I use Fortify Software Security Center on-premises for its intuitive dashboard that aggregates DAS and SAS data. It enhances security by adhering to conventions like OWASP. However, I seek better dataset views and analysis features similar to SIM tools.
Sales Manager at Pbland4.0No summary available
Conformity Controller at STET4.0I work with Fortify Software Security Center, which effectively explains security issues and integrates into the CI/CD process for daily testing. However, I've experienced many false positives, likely due to using an outdated version.
General Manager at Inexion Co.4.5We use Fortify Software Security Center to scan and analyze data from Azure. It effectively identifies vulnerabilities, especially with the audit workbench and collaboration module. However, its overlap feature demands costly customization. We chose Fortify for its language support and strong engine.
Application Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Fortify Software Security Center for application security testing. Its valuable feature is the ability to easily download and update rule packs. However, the setup process is quite challenging and could be improved for better user experience.
AVP at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5No summary available
Head Of Information Security at a tech services company with 51-200 employees3.5No summary available