Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ManageEngine IT360 Logo

ManageEngine IT360 Reviews

Vendor: ManageEngine
4.2 out of 5

What is ManageEngine IT360?

Featured ManageEngine IT360 reviews

ManageEngine IT360 mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 in the Network Monitoring Software category stands at 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ManageEngine IT3600.4%
Zabbix5.0%
SolarWinds NPM3.6%
Other91.0%
Network Monitoring Software
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Service and Support

Stability

 
ManageEngine IT360 Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)5.0I've used ManageEngine for five years for monitoring and configuration. It's stable, easy to deploy, and great for collecting network info. My main wish is for ServiceDesk integration. I rate it 10/10.
Telecommunications Engineer at FARNAIT5.0I use this scalable solution to protect my company's web/mail servers. Technical support is excellent, and setup was simple. I'd like better traffic graphs, but I rate it 10/10.
CISO at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5I rate ManageEngine 7-8; it's excellent for Active Directory insight and tracking. It's stable, but I desire more intelligence and automation. My biggest issue is limited technical knowledge, making it hard to fully utilize its power.
Security & Network Specialist at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I find IT360's distributed model valuable for monitoring multiple sites centrally. Setup was easy, and I've had no issues, though the GUI could improve. Overall, it's easy to administer, and I recommend this product.
System Engineer at a university with 51-200 employees4.0I find this product incredibly stable with fantastic support and easy setup, though its SNMP downtime scheduler needs fixing. I recommend using a separate SQL server instead of the included database.