Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetApp AFF A-Series Logo

NetApp AFF A-Series Reviews

Vendor: NetApp
4.4 out of 5

What is NetApp AFF A-Series?

Featured NetApp AFF A-Series reviews

 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Compare NetApp AFF A-Series with alternative products

Learn more about NetApp AFF A-Series

Related questions

 
NetApp AFF A-Series Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Systems Engineer at MacLean-Fogg Company4.5NetApp AFF provides us with a stable, high-performance platform for our enterprise software, aided by SnapMirror for disaster recovery. The Keystone agreement offers cost-effective storage expansion, and its reliability and ease of management align with our company's goals.
Senior Storage Engineer at Orange Business4.0As a storage service provider, we find the NetApp AFF A-Series invaluable for latency-sensitive web applications. Its inline deduplication and compression offer significant storage savings without performance loss, despite a desire for lower pricing. We achieve up to 85% savings in specific scenarios.
Manager ICT Infra and Operations at De LIjn4.0I find NetApp AFF A-Series valuable for its hot and cold storage, along with immutable snapshots for enhanced security. It surpasses our previous HP solution in performance and ease of maintenance. A yearly partnership review for feature updates would be beneficial.
Sr. Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees5.0I appreciate the 400 Series from NetApp AFF for its clustering and volume flexibility, which solved our latency issues. However, its ransomware protection needs enhancement. We chose it over Pure Storage and EMC due to maturity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness.
Service Advisor at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.5I use NetApp AFF A-Series for block and SAN storage, mainly for databases. It's faster and more robust than their previous all-flash storage, with excellent support, although the cost needs improvement. I previously considered HP and Hitachi Vantara.
Design Automation Principal Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0Our primary use case for NetApp AFF is as media infrastructure storage. We had Pure Storage before, and although I wasn't involved in the decision, I believe we switched for better speed. However, improved collaboration with Cisco and enhanced speed are needed.
Product Owner Storage at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I find NetApp AFF's MetroCluster and update packages very valuable, offering efficient storage synchronization and streamlined updates. However, we face limitations with volume shares, especially with Kubernetes containers, requiring improvements in these areas for better functionality.
Senior Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I've used NetApp AFF A-Series since 2016 for high-performance workloads like databases due to its scalability and efficiency, though improvements in VMware integration, automation, and open-source support would make it even better.