Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ScienceLogic Logo

ScienceLogic Reviews

Vendor: ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is ScienceLogic?

Featured ScienceLogic reviews

ScienceLogic mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of ScienceLogic in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category stands at 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ScienceLogic1.7%
Zabbix12.0%
Datadog5.0%
Other81.3%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring

PeerResearch reports based on ScienceLogic reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIT Infrastructure MonitoringOct 4, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonScienceLogic vs ZabbixOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonScienceLogic vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)Oct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonScienceLogic vs DatadogOct 4, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Veeam Data Platform4.3N/A94%429 interviewsAdd to research
Zabbix4.212.0%95%107 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business133
Midsize Enterprise58
Large Enterprise472
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
University
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Non Profit
3%
Media Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare ScienceLogic with alternative products

Learn more about ScienceLogic

ScienceLogic customers

Related questions

 
ScienceLogic Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd3.0No summary available
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy4.5I use ScienceLogic as a strategic monitoring tool for infrastructure and applications; it's reliable and scalable but needs better UI flexibility and support responsiveness. Integration with ServiceNow improved alerts, though setup and template application remain manual.
Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech4.5I use ScienceLogic for hybrid monitoring, benefiting from its Python customization, business service mapping, and automation features. Its integration and automation capabilities enhance efficiency. Although professional services are often needed, it offers significant value in time and cost savings.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I primarily use ScienceLogic for monitoring infrastructure and management. The CMDB update and Skyler.AI features are valuable. However, better integration of observability and APM monitoring is needed. I also use other automation tools, like Ansible, due to broader automation capabilities.
Administrative Assistant at First Rand Bank Ltd.3.0I use ScienceLogic to monitor servers and DNSs. It offers valuable infra-monitoring with alerts, but it lacks a deep infrastructure view and API features. While better than Nagios, it's not user-friendly and requires knowledge to use effectively.
IT Enterprise Architect at Capgemini3.5No summary available
CEO at Parker Digital4.5No summary available
Architect at Kyndryl4.0I use ScienceLogic for infrastructure monitoring, appreciating its agentless design and PowerPacks. It's easy to deploy and supported well, though it lacks robust reporting and APM capabilities. We supplement with tools like IBM Cognos or Tableau for reporting.