Wrike Reviews

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team. 

I find Wrike's form system very valuable. I can share forms with my collaborators, and they can fill them out, providing me with the necessary information. Another useful feature is the communication platform, which makes it easy to tag someone and communicate efficiently. Additionally, the integration with Microsoft Office is great. I can create a card on Wrike directly from my MS Teams chat, which is convenient.

The tool generates Gantt charts whenever information is presented in tabular format. 

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website.

The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features. 

I have been working with the product for more than one year. 

I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten. 

I rate the tool's deployment ease as seven out of ten. It can be completed in 30 minutes. 

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend it to others. 

The tool helps us to collaborate for marketing. It helps us come together and review. The solution also helps us with commenting and assigning. 

The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds. 

The product needs to send direct emails to customers updating the latest aspects since it is better to hear directly. 

I have been working with the product since 2012. 

The tool is stable. I haven't encountered any bugs. 

The solution is scalable. My company has 150 users for the product. 

We were impressed with the tool's integrations and scalability. Hence, we chose it. 

The solution's setup is easy for small organizations. However, it is complicated for larger organizations where you require training since there are many people trying to adapt to it. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. We use the product's desktop and browser versions. The tool is dynamic and capable of adjusting to our different workflows. The product is an enterprise solution, so you need to consider the number of people using it and the budget before choosing it. The success of the product's implementation is fully dependent on your leadership and management. 

We use Wrike mainly for Project and Task Management, some aspects of ticketing systems, correspondence, and reporting. We also use Wrike for request forms and formal communication related to projects/tasks, analytics, and insight. Our work revolves mainly around the AEC industry and Property Management (along with supporting departments), so Wrike is a great tool to integrate all of that.

We heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, and managing all sorts of projects and tasks; having a correspondence history is convenient. having general awareness of the project and company status, helps with that too.

It's full of unique and interesting features. Wrike keep everything centralized in one place, and that goes along with our CDE principles for any platform we manage in our organization. It enables cross-tagging of certain items, sharing, reporting, and having insight into multiple places of our work.

Sometimes, when you have a bigger project, item dependencies can take a while to update, other than that no complaints. In future releases, I would like to see correspondence with members who are not direct members of our account (and/or not using Wrike at all) or communication with people out of the organization.

We have been using it for about two years, but we had a period dedicated to implementation, which took around a year. Since we have a relatively complex company structure, we had invested some time configuring all aspects to accompany all department's needs.

Stable platform, the customer service is one of the best.

It is convenient. I would leave a rating of ten out of ten.

I must give the customer service and support team a ten because I have reached out a few times, and they were prompt. I haven't waited more than one hour. I'll give the good technical support straight up a ten out of ten.

Positive

Wrike is very convenient and easy to use. In my opinion,  those who have the time and resources to invest in implementing this tool will benefit the most.

It returns the investment in the long run, as it makes everything systematic and organized.

We've been using it for a few years now. This is a relative one but seems like Wrike is worth of our resources.

We have used Microsoft Project and Planner.

The value of Wrike might not be evident right from the get-go, so you need to spend some time with it. With the right approach to implementation, it certainly is a valuable tool.

The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality. After creating it, I can tag a task and select which folder the task belongs to. So I only need to modify one task, and all the folders will be automatically updated from this task. The thumbnail functionality is another useful function of Wrike, which is quite uncommon in many software.

The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team. We are a startup, and we have a small team. Wrike's price is almost $1,400, and even if I want to work with Wrike, our team members may not allow me to use it.

Wrike should add more functions to its mobile app because, currently, the mobile app only has a few functions that we cannot edit or modify.

I have been using Wrike for four years.

I rate Wrike an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate Wrike a seven out of ten for scalability.

Wrike’s technical support is very professional.

Positive

Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400.

Wrike has more advantages than other software management materials.

I would like to use Wrike even more in the future. However, I only use the free version since its price is too high. I will use Wrike for my personal uses, but I will need to persuade my team to use Wrike for my company.

Overall, I rate Wrike a seven out of ten.

We're also using Wrike in activity follow-up. We also use Slack as a communication tool. We use Wrike to track projects.

The product is a pretty simple tool. We focus on the project activities and reports with it. That's what we use the most.

It’s very user-friendly.

The solution is stable and reliable.

It’s scalable.

The solution, in general, works well. I haven’t found any bugs or anything to be improved.

Sometimes, since it's in the cloud, information isn't updated as fast as you need it to be. With some changes, it took a while to see those changes reflected.

It would be great if they could develop more reporting. In terms of the reporting model, if they can make it a little bit more complete, it would be ideal. We’d like to create reports using more filters and more fields.

We’ve been using the solution for a couple of years.

The solution is bug-free and reliable. There are no glitches. The performance is good. The product is stable.

The scalability has been fine. It’s not an issue at all to expand.

We have about 25 users on the solution currently. We’re likely to increase usage by the end of the year.

I don't know how much the licensing costs. I wasn't in charge of that aspect. The IT department handles the license arrangements and payments.

I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

We’re a customer and an end-user.

We use Wrike to manage our work.

Visibility and organization are the most valuable features of Wrike.

Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features. There are many requests on the website that have not been addressed.

The price has room for improvement.

I would like the ability to add dependencies between projects. Currently, we can add predecessors and successors to a task within a project. I would like the ability to link the projects together by adding dependencies to their start and end dates.

I have been using Wrike for two and a half years.

Wrike is a stable solution.

The technical support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward.

Wrike is expensive.

I give Wrike a seven out of ten. The functionality works well, but they are not adding any additional features that seem logical or simple to add. Wrike adds features that they think are good but they don't listen to their customers well.

We have 350 people that use the solution.

I recommend Wrike if it meets an organization's requirements.

We're mainly using it for project management and time tracking. It is for managing tasks, and my department, which is the IT department, uses it for tracking project time.

We utilize time tracking and reports most often.

We feel that the actual project reports and roll-ups could be a lot different. We are seeking something more for the dashboard. We would like a high-level dashboard that can be broken down into individual product roll-ups and tasks that are assigned. If you assign someone to a task, it assigns them all of the tasks under that. We want to be able to break those down so that a person doesn't have an 800 task list, for example. We want more separation with that and a higher-level dashboard experience.

I've been using Wrike for the last six months. My company has been using Wrike for about a year.

Its stability is pretty good.

Its scalability is pretty good. We use one of the enterprise versions or business versions of it, which is one of the higher ones because we have a lot of people.  Overall, we have at least a couple of hundred users. Within my department, we have 78 people who are currently using it. The IT department is its main user.

Their support is pretty good. They've been pretty helpful.

It was pretty user-friendly.

It was implemented in-house.

I'd rate it an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to organize projects, and each project can be contained in a folder or can contain several folders. We can easily write down the tasks and reorganize them as well as have a progression index. Wrike offers several views including a kanban view and Gantt chart view. 

This solution could be improved if we were able to better analyze how the application consumes cloud resources as this can cause a delay in performance. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

This is a stable solution. 

The customer support for this solution is good. I would rate it a four out of five. 

Positive

The initial setup can be complex if you don't have a lot of knowledge of how this solution works. 

From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We are using Wrike for defining tasks to move between different persons in our company and for managing the status of a task among different persons. We are a global company, and we use it for things like onboarding workers. We create tasks from the beginning of the process and move it from status to status. Each team gets a notification every time you change the status of a task. 

It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly.

On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks.

One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow.

Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently.

I have been using this solution for two years. 

It is stable most of the time. Sometimes, there is a problem with response time, but it's mostly stable.

It is easy to scale and expand. We have about 30 users in our company who use this tool on a daily basis. 

We have contacted technical support, and we get the answers by email. It was okay. We get the answers very quickly from technical support.

We are also using Trello, which is a very similar tool. We are using Trello on a smaller scale than Wrike. It's a free tool, and we are using the free version of Trello. 

Wrike is an enterprise tool, and it has more features than Trello. 

The initial setup was simple. It took two weeks to create all the templates and so on.

We implemented it ourselves. We don't use external help for this kind of tool. The maintenance of Wrike is automatic.

Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users. 

You have a lot of tools with the same kind of functionality in the market. You should exactly define the precise requirement that you need from the tool and also think a few steps ahead in terms of the needs of the company in a few years. 

It is not enough to see the present specific requirements because sometimes, the solution we choose is not enough to grow. It's not easy to change from one solution to the other. These tools look very simple, but you have to think about what exactly you want to manage within the tool.

I would rate Wrike a seven out of ten. We are looking for real workflow support and management of tasks features. 

Our IT management was looking for project and task management tool for the IT Staff, and after our research, this is the solution that was selected.

This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties. It enables us to collaborate faster and better progress on our projects. At the same time, our management has a good view of our progress by using the Wrike dashboards

We find many of the features valuable, including:

• User interface


• Alternative Dashboards


• Simple task and subtask creation and assignment


• My work view


• Security features


• Integration features


• Simple administration and account management


• Account types, which provide a good distribution of external and internal users licenses


• Individual workspaces

We faced a lot of issues with the mobile application, especially with the iOS version. It needs enhancements and updates. 

We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version.

We researched and tested a lot of applications in our search for the proper tool, and in the end, we selected Wrike.