We use Automation Anywhere to track the travel and locking of our devices.
We implemented Automation Anywhere because we needed a way to track our devices and ensure they were not going beyond their boundaries.
We use Automation Anywhere to track the travel and locking of our devices.
We implemented Automation Anywhere because we needed a way to track our devices and ensure they were not going beyond their boundaries.
Before Automation Anywhere we were manually tracking our devices and now it is done automatically.
Automation Anywhere helps to save a full day. Automation Anywhere helps save costs by allowing remote work and not requiring a person to be at the machine.
The efficiency we get with Automation Anywhere is valuable.
The Automation Anywhere calibrating needs to be more user-friendly to avoid human error.
Non-technical people can not use Automation Anywhere.
I have been using Automation Anywhere for one year.
The stability of Automation Anywhere depends on the environment it is used in. For example, in hot environments, there can be deviations.
The technical support is good.
The initial setup was a little complex until we became familiar with the process.
The deployment took one week and required two people.
Automation Anywhere is reasonably priced because it can sustain us for a long period.
I would rate Automation Anywhere eight out of ten. The technology is improving every day.
With the right tools, it is easy to upgrade Automation Anywhere.
Maintenance is required for Automation Anywhere to ensure proper functionality daily. Two people for 20 minutes each day is enough to oversee the maintenance.
I recommend completing some courses and shadowing experienced Automation Anywhere users to gain hands-on experience with the automation process.
Our clients use it for different things. One uses it for invoice processing and another for the aggregation of documents based on certain characters. Another uses it to automate processes for the admin department. That company has seasonal workers, and they have to create passes for those seasonal workers. Most of the document uploading and validation is done by Automation Anywhere. Most of those documents are issued by the federal government, and they have a standard format.
One thing I really like is the recorder where you can connect with multiple systems. The OCR is also good. In one case, we used a different OCR than Automation Anywhere, but in document processing, using the OCR engine is good.
And providing automation at scale is something I feel is a strength of Automation Anywhere compared to most tools. It depends on the segment we are dealing with. There are small organizations that might not need robust applications, but for mid-sized and large customers, we usually propose automation anywhere. It's quite robust, and the performance is good. When we are proposing a solution, the automation at scale makes it much easier for us, post-sales and post-implementation.
Also, the integration of the solution's bots with APIs and business applications is good. There are certain prebuilt integration APIs in Automation Anywhere. That's especially true when you're connecting with SAP. There are issues with SAP, but in general, they have connectors with most of the popular CRM tools. The API connectivity is much easier.
We only faced some problems when integrating it with SAP, and Oracle integration was a bit challenging, especially with Oracle Fusion. We had some issues when we were trying to connect some of the applications on the API level. But, in general, integration using Automation Anywhere is fine.
I have been working with Automation Anywhere since 2019, or about four years.
In the last year, the cloud has become bigger, but before that, it was implemented more on-prem only.
From our side, the number of staff needed for an implementation depends on the number of processes we need to deploy. For the initial configuration, we may not need many people. But, for one of our customers, there are 70 processes that need to be developed over the next 18 months. Obviously, the number of people involved will be much greater than in a project where we're looking at 10 or 15 processes to be implemented. But on average, each process takes at least two to three resources, depending on the complexity.
Once you have deployed an application, you need to maintain it. Compared to other products, it takes slightly fewer people. Maintenance on the admin side requires one to two people. We always assign one FTE for this, at a minimum. Depending on other factors, we might go for two.
Automation Anywhere is more stable compared to some of the other tools on the market. And, post-implementation, we have very few issues with it compared to others. For me, it's all about post-implementation and why customers are happier with Automation Anywhere.
For small and medium-sized customers, we may not suggest Automation Anywhere because of the cost difference.
UiPath has gotten much better in the last two years. They have really grown in terms of overall performance and bot capabilities. There has been a huge improvement there.
As for non-technical users, it's not a low-code type of solution where you draw and drag and drop. Still, it's okay, to some extent, if they at least have some understanding of technology. Generally, it's easy to learn. If you have access to Automation Anywhere University, you can really learn it. But because I am from a technology background, it was much easier for me. We give our customers 13 or 14 sessions to bring them up to speed, and that might span over the period of a month to two months.
In the discussion about RPA versus API integration, one definite advantage of automation is that scheduling, bot management, and those kinds of things are automated. It's more about the customer and their perspective. With automation, you already have something cooked up, and you don't have to worry about much at a later stage. That makes automation much easier for them than using an API integration. You have to maintain an API integration, and there is the cost of maintaining it. With all those factors, automation becomes much easier for the customer.
We have been proposing Automation Anywhere to multiple customers. It's good. It's robust. But it's a bit expensive compared to other RPA tools on the market. Sometimes, it's too heavy for customers, especially if it's on-prem. Also, maintenance is slightly higher.
I worked for a call center company and most of the use cases were related to developing automation for our clients. We also created some automation for internal processes.
The integrations of Automation Anywhere with the mainframe application for banking companies are among the most valuable features. Banking companies have a black screen (a text-based user interface) used in some banking core systems. In our case, we were able to create very good solutions integrated with that kind of platform using Automation Anywhere.
Also, if you need to use OCR automation to process standard invoices and send the information to another platform, that is also a very good feature.
The goal of any automation is to provide efficiencies. I would like a way, within the platform, to track the benefits. If you are the center of excellence manager, you need to show to the C level the value that you are adding to the company. The unique way to show that to the C level is how much money you are bringing into the company or how much money you are saving the company in costs. I would like a default feature where each bot gives us data on all the benefits it provides from its process.
They also need to improve and work very hard on the user experience to democratize automation.
I have been using Automation Anywhere for four years.
It's a very good platform in terms of stability.
Automation Anywhere has very good scalability when you want to scale an existing bot.
It is very easy to contact them and receive support from them.
Positive
We were working with a local system.
The initial setup is very easy. If you are not setting it up in a virtual environment, it takes between half an hour and one hour, maximum.
We have deployed it on the cloud, using AWS.
There is no maintenance of the solution on our side.
My team did the setup.
These types of companies, in automation, need to evaluate their business models. They sell it by license, but if they could charge by case or by interaction, that might be better. Right now, it's expensive when you want to scale or use them for simple processes.
I know my Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Blue Prism and, now, Microsoft Power Automate. If you want to automate a simple process, these solutions are very good. But if you need to integrate different platforms or systems using an API, or if you want to widen the scope of automation to create an automated process, end to end, that is going to be difficult for any user. You need to be a developer with very good programming skills. If you are going to automate, for example, downloading emails, Automation Anywhere is okay for non-technical users. But the license is very expensive, so you have to weigh the benefit that you are going to receive.
For me and my team of around 150 developers who are engineers, the learning curve was very easy. For them, it took two or three months because they were already familiar with the logic. Automation Anywhere has good information on the web where the guys can access material and forums to learn about creating different types of automation.
The benefits, for us, from Automation Anywhere are more related to the business case than the tool. You need to have a very good approach from the business analyst's perspective to understand the added value that an automated process can bring to the company.
The most important thing is to train the business analysts in your company to identify what the best processes are to automate, to get the most benefit from the tool.
Overall, this is a very good tool if you have all the permissions and accesses, and you can work without any virtual environment, like VDI or Citrix.
We have used it for many projects and many different types of companies. For example, we have used it to solve problems that companies have with backups, as well as issues of integration with legacy systems. We also use it for human resources and suppliers.
With Automation Anywhere, we can digitize a process, optimize it, and reduce the cost and the time that process takes. It has also reduced failures in processes.
We have used it to increase automation by 100 percent.
The development tools are very good. It's very user-friendly and easy to develop and deploy with Automation Anywhere. Ordinary people, within a few weeks, can develop a bot using the tool. It's very easy for business users, who don't have technical skills, to use.
The learning curve is low. Within two months, non-technical people can be trained to use it.
Administration of the environment of the solution is also a valuable aspect. Scheduling the bots and the Control Room are very good.
Another element that is easy is the integration of RPA bots, APIs, business applications, and documents.
I have been using Automation Anywhere for four years.
It has good stability. It's a 10 out of 10.
The platform gives you an environment that you can easily scale within your company. The scalability is a nine out of 10.
Their technical support is good, but it could be better.
Positive
I have not used another RPA solution.
ROI is very good. We measure processes that we automate and calculate the reduced cost.
It's the best RPA tool, but the pricing could be improved.
Whether to use an API integration or an RPA solution depends on the use case. If there is a possibility of using an API integration, it could be better because the integration can be more secure. But if you have a legacy system where API integration is not possible you can use Automation Anywhere. It also depends on the expectations of the customer. Sometimes, the implementation via Automation Anywhere can be faster. If the customer doesn't have a lot of time and you need to deliver the solution, RPA could be the best solution.
And Automation Anywhere doesn't require any maintenance.
Automation Anywhere is one of the best tools on the market. It's a little expensive but if you implement it in your company, you should see return on investment.
Automation Anywhere is used by our customers for automation support.
Developers can easily utilize Automation Anywhere. For individuals with no prior knowledge, there is a university website available for training, and I also provide assistance in training my customers.
Automation Anywhere has a short learning curve. It takes five days to train new users.
We have seen the benefits of Automation Anywhere right from the start.
Automation Anywhere ability to provide automation at scale is good.
Automation Anywhere can quickly and easily integrate with RPA bots, APIs, and business applications.
It has helped our organization increase automation consumption.
The dashboards are excellent.
The regional distribution in Turkey can be improved.
I have been using Automation Anywhere for six years.
We have two customers who use Automation Anywhere on the cloud and two customers who use it on-premises.
Automation Anywhere is highly stable.
Scaling Automation Anywhere on-premises is difficult, but in the cloud, it becomes easier.
The technical support team is extremely responsive.
Positive
The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment can be completed by one person within an hour.
The implementation is completed in-house.
The cost of Automation Anywhere is high in Turkey due to the weak economy.
I rate Automation Anywhere a ten out of ten. I recommend Automation Anywhere to others.
APIs are easy to connect, and I highly recommend integrating APIs over robot process automation.
Automation Anywhere is easy to maintain and update.
We maintain 50 bots, and each of them requires five minutes to install.
We're using Automation Anywhere to automate and schedule some processes.
Many tasks take a long time for a person to do them. Automation Anywhere enables us to do those jobs in less time. Our overall automation consumption has increased by about 80 percent since we started using AA.
Automation Anywhere is easy to use, even if you lack technical skills. People without deep technical expertise can easily develop scenarios.
Automation Anywhere could add a few technical features to the UI and some better reporting or validation about whether processes are running successfully.
We have used Automation Anywhere for only two weeks.
We haven't used the solution for very long, but it seems stable so far.
I rate Automation Anywhere eight out of 10 for scalability.
I rate Automation Anywhere support eight out of 10.
Positive
I was around for the deployment, but I didn't set Automation Anywhere up. The deployment only required one engineer and took a day to complete. The solution hasn't required any maintenance in the short time that we've used it.
Automation Anywhere is a subscription-based service. I think the price is reasonable.
I rate Automation Anywhere seven out of 10. It's a good tool that supports a lot of scenarios, and it can save you time and money. In some cases, you can use API integration, but RPA makes more sense for other tasks because you don't need to develop anything.
We are a distributor of Automation Anywhere in Malaysia, and our focus is on solving business problems related to accounting, reporting, network operation centers, and first-level troubleshooting.
We deploy the solution on both AWS and Google Public Cloud.
Since we are the distributors of the solution, the improvements provided by Automation Anywhere vary for each of our customers.
The drag-and-drop feature is valuable.
Once we deliver to the customer, and they see the code, they can truly understand it without needing programming knowledge. As customers don't want to rely on vendors constantly.
The analytical dashboard in the Control Room could use some improvement. Currently, it's quite basic, which can pose a challenge when customers require more advanced features. Of course, different customers will have varying needs and expectations, so there's no one-size-fits-all solution. However, I believe it would be helpful if our team could have more flexibility in developing a more sophisticated analytical bot to meet these diverse demands.
I have been using the solution for five years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is scalable. We use the solution in multiple locations.
The technical support is good.
Positive
I previously used UiPath and WinAutomation by Softmotive but Automation Anywhere is easier to use.
The return on investment that our customers experience with Automation Anywhere typically revolves around the saved processing time and reduced headcount.
Although the initial implementation cost of Automation Anywhere is relatively high compared to other options, its annual subscription cost is lower than UiPath's, which has the opposite pricing structure.
I give the solution an eight out of ten.
I recommend Automation Anywhere to others.
We use Automation Anywhere to automate all the repetitive tasks that was previously done manually by individuals and to reduce the risk of human-errors so we can save time and money, It's like creating a digital employee that will work more quickly and accurately than humans. We mainly use it for the service desk tasks and to handle requests and also to create invoices and approving bills in finance and accounting departments, And we're implementing it into all of our departments since we found the benefits of it.
We have solved many problems we had in the past before using Automation Anywhere, Mainly we saved a lot of time and money, We reduced and minimized the risk of human-errors and got rid of all the manual repetitive tasks so we can focus on the core of our business, All the people in charge of supervision are dedicated now to a more important tasks. We succeed to reduce the response time of our business processes and this increased our performance and effected on our overall, But then when we started implementing RPA solutions for our clients, We had to switch to another product with an easier implementation and more friendly interface.
The most valuable feature for me is the power of AI Technologies involved in Automation Anywhere's IQBot such as Natural Language Processing, Computer Vision, Fuzzy Logic, and Machine Learning to automatically classify, extract and validate information from business documents and emails, I also like the Bot Insight to analyze and optimize the processes, I also like the visual flow charts and the drag-and-drop actions, I like the cloud infrastructure and security and the lightweight web-based architecture.
They need to improve the REST Api Documentation because its not well detailed or clear enough for beginners, They need to provide some out of the box AI and ML functions such as Image classification and Objection Identification, They also need to improve the real-time data and analytics,There is less support for various data types, The .NET Framework is not completely supported and they have to add more features to fully support the .NET, Last advice is to add an option for developers for Graphical View along with the Code View option.
We're using Automation Anywhere (AA) for the financial departments of a lot of civil engineering companies here in Greece. There's also one pharmaceutical company that uses it in their financial department.
I find Automation Anywhere (AA) to be really fast on the development side. They are also using a good engine. They have an efficient and intelligent system, e.g. it's IBM's, so it's one of the best. The connectors in Automation Anywhere (AA) are also good, and they're working fine. These are all the features I found most valuable in the tool.
One area for improvement in Automation Anywhere (AA) is its monitoring system. It's not that good.
The scalability of the tool also needs improvement, because when you set up another machine to run the process, the system would become full.
We've been using Automation Anywhere (AA) for three years.
My impression on the stability of Automation Anywhere (AA) is that there's still room for improvement there. A lot of times during the day, one or two out of 20 cases lose their elements, or lose a window, and that should be improved.
The scalability of Automation Anywhere (AA) needs to be improved.
Setting up Automation Anywhere (AA) was not that hard, but I can't say that it was easy. I don't know if I did something wrong in the configuration when I first installed the tool. You have to configure the database yourself, and I believe that the tool should configure itself.
Licensing for Automation Anywhere (AA) is paid on a yearly basis. Out of all the RPA tools, it has the most value for money, e.g. what you pay is what you get.
On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being expensive, I'm rating the price of Automation Anywhere (AA) a three. It's not as expensive, but it's not that cheap, too. If you'll use it long term, then it's better, but the company that you're selling it to, they have to trust you, and you should also have knowledge about the sales.
We're now using version 16 of Automation Anywhere (AA), and that is the latest version. Previously, I was able to use version 11.
I have not contacted the technical support team for Automation Anywhere (AA), because we are partners with IBM who are partners of Automation Anywhere (AA), so I'm working with IBM and talking with IBM support, instead of the support team for the tool.
If somebody wanted to use Automation Anywhere (AA) for the first time, the advice I would give that person is that it's the only tool that's easy to learn in terms of how to develop, but you have to read the manual about the monitoring system and the control room, especially about the control room, because it's really complicated. I found the control room complicated.
Overall, I'm rating Automation Anywhere (AA) eight out of ten. I'm giving it an eight, just because of the cases that you are losing according to the spying or monitoring system. You're losing a lot, and your customer is not really happy about that.
I've used Automation Anywhere RPA as one of the RPA platforms to automate business processes within the company. It started as attended automation initially and then moved to unattended mode. We're using the on-prem version with Runners on virtual desktop.
We have used/are using the AA360 Platform for automating the business processes in HR, Finance, and telecom operations.
IQBOT is also used for purchase order processing to capture the semi-structured data and process it in ERPs to achieve straight-through processing of these documents.
Implementation of Automation Anywhere (AA) allows us to automate business processes and has brought productivity gains, error reduction, and speed of execution in multiple HR and Finance operations.
This automation has also helped in achieving better compliance and standardization of the processes. A number of processes were able to be digitalized 100% without much human interaction required. The only exceptions are managed by humans although the RPA bots are doing the majority of the work.
Implementation of IQBOT has helped in capturing the semi-structure data from pdfs and doing the straight-through processing of these documents.
Web-based ID for development is helping developers to use any machine (laptop, VDI, etc.) to access the environment and develop it.
Enabling collaborative development where multiple developers can work together is great.
The flow view is helping us to view the overall flow of the activities and is helping the functional review faster without jumping to the code level, ensuring all the exceptions are handled accordingly and there are no exceptions that are not handled.
The addition of multiple drag and drop functions in the development of IDE helps ease the development work.
Queue management is still missing from the latest version which is a barrier to using the platform to start implementing complex cases where you have parent and child transactions going through multiple stages.
Without queue management, it is not possible to manage the multiple-step work item processing. For example, task automation instead of process automation is where hands-off is required in between the workflow steps.
Simplification in managing multiple environments for dev, test, and production would be useful.
There needs to be more stability in the platforms.
I've been using Autoamtion anywhere for the last five years. I've used a different version and now have migrated to AA 360 for the last year.
The stability is an improvement area for the product. We still have issues sometimes where bots hang up.
It's a scalable solution. We didn't face any issue in that regard.
There is good technical support available from the AA team.
Positive
We started with AA for more attended automation.
The setup is a bit complex and was done by the AA team.
We implemented the solution using an internal team and external partner.
We say an ROI after six to nine months.
The solution is cost-effective in comparison to others. However, you need to pay for the control room for each environment. You also need developer licenses and even runners are required for test and pre-production environments.
We evaluated UiPath.
