Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo

Top 10 Check Point Harmony Endpoint Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony Endpoint based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony Endpoint surpasses its competitors by providing comprehensive threat prevention, seamless endpoint detection, and advanced data protection, ensuring optimal security and efficiency for business operations without compromising performance or user experience.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers extensive zero-day protection and anti-ransomware features, ideal for compliance needs. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR capabilities with real-time threat intelligence, benefiting those needing strong behavioral analysis and managed threat hunting.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup is pricier but includes comprehensive support features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup is pricier but includes comprehensive support features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint emphasizes innovative security features, offering granular control and robust defenses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels with seamless integration with Microsoft tools, providing ease of use on Windows platforms. Check Point offers varied pricing, while Microsoft supports bundled service costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a user-friendly setup with competitive costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a user-friendly setup with competitive costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost implementation.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers strong integration and extensive features, appealing to those needing comprehensive security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides ease of deployment and competitive pricing, ideal for organizations seeking streamlined setup and cost-effective threat management.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more straightforward setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR has a more intricate setup process that may incur additional expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more straightforward setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR has a more intricate setup process that may incur additional expenses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels with anti-ransomware and centralized management, making it ideal for integrative capabilities. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers automated threat response and AI-driven analysis, appealing to those seeking robust security insights and advanced threat detection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete features a complex setup process that generally incurs higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete features a complex setup process that generally incurs higher costs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in customer support and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, HP Wolf Security's advanced features like proactive threat isolation make it attractive for those prioritizing higher-level protection, despite potentially higher initial costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. HP Wolf Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while HP Wolf Security might involve additional expenses, reflecting different approach options and pricing strategies between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while HP Wolf Security might involve additional expenses, reflecting different approach options and pricing strategies between the two security solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers centralized management and comprehensive security with anti-ransomware features, ideal for organizations seeking integration with other security products. In comparison, Cortex XDR excels in AI-driven threat detection and real-time analytics, attracting buyers focused on advanced threat prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a lower setup cost, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher upfront investment. Each solution provides distinct advantages in initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a lower setup cost, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher upfront investment. Each solution provides distinct advantages in initial deployment expenses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels with advanced threat prevention and integration with existing firewalls. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR offers strong integration across the Microsoft suite. Check Point provides detailed threat logging, while Defender XDR benefits from AI-powered threat prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Microsoft Defender XDR may involve more complex installation and higher initial expenses. Harmony Endpoint's simplicity contrasts with Defender's potentially greater implementation requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Microsoft Defender XDR may involve more complex installation and higher initial expenses. Harmony Endpoint's simplicity contrasts with Defender's potentially greater implementation requirements.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat prevention and integration with a broader security ecosystem, suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive features. In comparison, Elastic Security's flexibility and scalability appeal to buyers needing customization and cost-effectiveness at lower data volumes.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Elastic Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is notably higher, while Elastic Security offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a key difference in initial financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is notably higher, while Elastic Security offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a key difference in initial financial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat prevention and broad integration, appealing to those seeking comprehensive features. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR provides simplicity and effective threat detection, attracting buyers prioritizing ease of use and straightforward deployment. Only Check Point offers diverse deployment options.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint features a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Huntress Managed EDR incurs higher initial expenses but offers robust integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint features a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Huntress Managed EDR incurs higher initial expenses but offers robust integration.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides robust threat prevention and centralized management suitable for integration with other security solutions. In comparison, Tanium excels in real-time data aggregation for risk identification and detailed analytics, making it ideal for complex environments requiring comprehensive device management.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Tanium Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup process, contrasting with Tanium's more intricate initial configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup process, contrasting with Tanium's more intricate initial configuration requirements.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint emphasizes security with advanced threat prevention, appealing for endpoint resilience. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox focuses on network defense with firewall capabilities, attracting enterprises valuing ease of deployment and management tailored to perimeter protection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting their varying cost structures for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting their varying cost structures for implementation.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive security with Threat Emulation, while Fortinet FortiClient stands out with VPN capabilities and seamless integration with Fortinet devices. In comparison, FortiClient offers competitive pricing, whereas Harmony Endpoint justifies higher costs with feature-rich threat management.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally has a straightforward setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which might involve more complexities and variations in cost depending on configuration choices.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally has a straightforward setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which might involve more complexities and variations in cost depending on configuration choices.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform focuses on robust encryption and comprehensive management, appealing to those valuing device compatibility. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint emphasizes advanced threat emulation and anti-ransomware features, making it suitable for environments prioritizing real-time threat detection with sophisticated security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is low, facilitating easy deployment, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint entails a higher setup investment, indicating a robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is low, facilitating easy deployment, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint entails a higher setup investment, indicating a robust feature set.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust endpoint security and seamless integration with management platforms, ideal for organizations needing comprehensive protection. In comparison, Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and efficient threat management, appealing to those prioritizing real-time insights and cloud-focused deployments.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a more manageable setup cost, while Trend Vision One's initial setup can be higher but offers a broader range of included features.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a more manageable setup cost, while Trend Vision One's initial setup can be higher but offers a broader range of included features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection with features like anti-virus and application control, ideal for multi-OS environments with its management console. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides extended threat protection modules, appealing for diverse deployment options and robust endpoint security.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a significant setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a significant setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in integration and innovative features, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is noted for modular protection and competitive pricing. In comparison, Kaspersky suits budget-conscious buyers, whereas Harmony Endpoint provides advanced management and reporting despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint involves a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business typically requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint involves a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business typically requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in cost structure.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers robust endpoint management with strong inventory and automation features. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint focuses on security with advanced threat prevention capabilities. Tech buyers might choose BigFix for management efficiency, whereas Harmony Endpoint appeals for enhanced security needs.
Download BigFix vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
BigFix has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which demands a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers resource-efficient security with features like ThreatSense and parental controls, ideal for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides comprehensive protection with advanced features such as Anti-Ransomware, making it suitable for organizations needing extensive security integration and control.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is generally considered affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is seen as higher. This highlights a price difference that could influence budget-conscious decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is generally considered affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is seen as higher. This highlights a price difference that could influence budget-conscious decisions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat prevention, offering diverse deployment options. In comparison, Lookout provides seamless mobile security with swift cloud deployment. Buyers might opt for Harmony Endpoint for extensive visibility or choose Lookout for specialized mobile endpoint protection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Lookout Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, whereas Lookout's initial investment might be higher due to its advanced integration options. These differences can influence budgeting decisions when choosing a suitable solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, whereas Lookout's initial investment might be higher due to its advanced integration options. These differences can influence budgeting decisions when choosing a suitable solution.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels with seamless firewall integration and anti-ransomware features. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers virtual patching and cost-effectiveness. Check Point is suitable for comprehensive management, while Trend Vision One appeals with ease of use and adaptability to evolving threats.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security with high pricing but scalable licensing, suiting those needing robust protection and flexibility. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR provides cost-effective, cloud-focused threat management, appealing to those prioritizing competitive pricing and streamlined operations in cloud environments.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup process with limited initial costs, while Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a more comprehensive setup requiring higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup process with limited initial costs, while Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a more comprehensive setup requiring higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint focuses on comprehensive endpoint protection, including antivirus and sandboxing. In comparison, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection excels in email security with anti-malware features. Tech buyers might select Harmony for broader security or choose EOP for streamlined email protection within Microsoft environments.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) offers more flexible pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) offers more flexible pricing options.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides robust security with premium pricing, ideal for businesses needing extensive protection and flexible deployment. In comparison, Cynet offers an integrated platform with competitive pricing, appealing to cost-sensitive buyers seeking simplified deployment and strong network and endpoint security.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cynet Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Cynet, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Cynet, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers features like Threat Emulation and Anti-Ransomware for comprehensive security. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint focuses on machine learning-based ransomware protection and EDR, ideal for those seeking advanced threat visibility and responsive capabilities.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has an initial setup cost that is often noted for its affordability, whereas Intercept X Endpoint typically requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has an initial setup cost that is often noted for its affordability, whereas Intercept X Endpoint typically requires a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security with features like Zero-Day Protection and Anti-Ransomware, excelling in integration. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced detection and application control, appealing for its ease of deployment and reasonable pricing.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves a more complex process potentially leading to higher expenses. The contrast is clear in terms of initial pricing structures and setup complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves a more complex process potentially leading to higher expenses. The contrast is clear in terms of initial pricing structures and setup complexity.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat protection and competitive pricing, ideal for diverse deployments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business integrates seamlessly into Microsoft environments, offering affordability through Microsoft 365 but requiring customization for complex threats.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more economical installation fee. This cost difference highlights Check Point's premium pricing focus versus Microsoft's competitive pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more economical installation fee. This cost difference highlights Check Point's premium pricing focus versus Microsoft's competitive pricing strategy.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive features, offering robust protection and integration within its ecosystem. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides superior EDR capabilities yet suggests enhancements in integration and threat detection automation, appealing to those prioritizing centralized management and advanced threat response.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers an affordable setup cost, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to be more expensive, making the former a cost-effective option for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers an affordable setup cost, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to be more expensive, making the former a cost-effective option for budget-conscious users.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint impresses with seamless integration within its ecosystem, offering advanced threat prevention, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR specializes in forensic visibility and security enhancements. In comparison, Bitdefender attracts with cost-effective licensing and ease of cloud-managed deployment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR requires a more complex setup, which may increase initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR requires a more complex setup, which may increase initial costs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive endpoint protection, ideal for enterprise structures seeking robustness with features like anti-malware and centralized management. In comparison, VirusTotal offers detailed threat analysis through multiple antivirus engines, making it suitable for investigative purposes over direct endpoint defense.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. VirusTotal Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas VirusTotal offers a free setup, highlighting a cost advantage for VirusTotal.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas VirusTotal offers a free setup, highlighting a cost advantage for VirusTotal.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in real-time threat prevention and integration within its own suite. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates seamlessly with the Cisco ecosystem at budget-friendly pricing. Both provide strong endpoint protection but differ in integration and unique feature offerings.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers simpler setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers simpler setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint may involve higher initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers extensive security suited for larger enterprises. In comparison, Norton Small Business focuses on simplicity and cost-effectiveness for smaller teams. Check Point's advanced features appeal to those needing robust protection, while Norton attracts small businesses with its ease of use and affordability.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Norton Small Business Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Norton Small Business involves a higher initial investment. Users will need to weigh the lower setup cost of Check Point against Norton's potentially more comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Norton Small Business involves a higher initial investment. Users will need to weigh the lower setup cost of Check Point against Norton's potentially more comprehensive feature set.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers superior threat detection and firewall integration, appealing for comprehensive network security. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams provides user-friendly malware scanning at competitive pricing, attracting smaller installations. Tech buyers choose based on specific security needs and budget considerations.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost with extensive features, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more cost-effective setup tailored for smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost with extensive features, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more cost-effective setup tailored for smaller teams.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive endpoint security with features like Threat Emulation and SandBlast for proactive threat identification. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager emphasizes privilege management, focusing on controlling and securing admin rights to minimize attack vectors and enhance security.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is relatively lower compared to CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, which may be more expensive but offers advanced privilege management features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is relatively lower compared to CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, which may be more expensive but offers advanced privilege management features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers extensive features like threat emulation and anti-ransomware protection, suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes zero-trust with application control, integrating multiple security layers for ease of management, appealing to tech buyers focused on comprehensive protection and support.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers quicker setup while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform entails higher initial configuration costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers quicker setup while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform entails higher initial configuration costs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in integration and user-friendly features, benefiting from cloud management. In comparison, Cybereason offers unique operation-centric tools for tracking and intuitive dashboards, enhancing threat investigation. Cybereason's seamless multi-OS operation appeals to diverse environments, while Harmony's centralized management strengthens security infrastructure.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers an easy setup at a lower cost, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response provides a more robust setup option with a slightly higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers an easy setup at a lower cost, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response provides a more robust setup option with a slightly higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint attracts cost-conscious tech buyers with competitive pricing and effective support. In comparison, Datto EDR justifies its higher price with a comprehensive feature set, appealing to enterprises seeking advanced threat response and extensive security measures.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is minimal, focusing on immediate deployment, while Datto EDR incurs higher initial expenses due to comprehensive installation features. The differences highlight Harmony’s affordability versus Datto’s emphasis on robust installation processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is minimal, focusing on immediate deployment, while Datto EDR incurs higher initial expenses due to comprehensive installation features. The differences highlight Harmony’s affordability versus Datto’s emphasis on robust installation processes.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint shines with seamless integration and proactive threat hunting. In comparison, Red Canary offers advanced threat detection using behavioral analytics. Check Point suits those prioritizing policy enforcement, while Red Canary fits those valuing detection precision and superior customer service.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Red Canary Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher setup cost compared to Red Canary, emphasizing a difference in initial expense for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher setup cost compared to Red Canary, emphasizing a difference in initial expense for users.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust threat prevention and data protection, ideal for enterprises needing extensive security features. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites provides strong malware protection with cost-effective pricing, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive support and affordable solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive security features, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive security features, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security features and centralized management, suitable for environments prioritizing threat protection. In comparison, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management emphasizes privileged access and compliance, with benefits in mixed-system environments through strong analytics and administrative management.
Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, highlighting a budget-friendly option for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, highlighting a budget-friendly option for businesses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint delivers integrated security with anti-malware and phishing protection, ideal for endpoint protection. In comparison, NetWitness NDR offers advanced network threat detection, suitable for network-level defense. Harmony excels in endpoint management, while NetWitness provides real-time network analysis.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. NetWitness NDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more manageable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR typically incurs higher initial expenses. Harmony Endpoint facilitates rapid deployment, contrasting with NetWitness NDR's more extensive setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more manageable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR typically incurs higher initial expenses. Harmony Endpoint facilitates rapid deployment, contrasting with NetWitness NDR's more extensive setup requirements.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust integration and centralized management, ideal for larger setups. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance excels with efficient AI-driven malware protection and ease of deployment, appealing to users prioritizing lightweight solutions and quick technical support in straightforward environments.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint involves a more straightforward setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity tends to have a higher initial expense. Users may prefer Check Point for easier cost management during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint involves a more straightforward setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity tends to have a higher initial expense. Users may prefer Check Point for easier cost management during implementation.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in integration features, centralized management, and advanced phishing protection, suiting organizations seeking robust policy management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert prioritizes malware detection and security analytics, appealing to tech buyers focused on comprehensive threat detection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for its straightforward setup process, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is noted for its flexible configuration options, appealing to organizations with complex needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for its straightforward setup process, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is noted for its flexible configuration options, appealing to organizations with complex needs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive features and diverse deployment options, appealing to those needing extensive functionality. In comparison, Morphisec emphasizes lightweight protection and cost-effectiveness, attracting buyers focused on efficient, low-impact threat prevention with effective customer support.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Morphisec Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, providing comprehensive security features, whereas Morphisec offers a lower setup cost with a focus on lightweight and innovative threat prevention solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, providing comprehensive security features, whereas Morphisec offers a lower setup cost with a focus on lightweight and innovative threat prevention solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive features like threat emulation and Zero Phishing, appealing to organizations seeking strong integration capabilities. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides cost-effective threat prevention, catering to those prioritizing intricate detection over broader integration options.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has minimal setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has minimal setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
TitanHQ SpamTitan
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
TitanHQ SpamTitan
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint delivers robust endpoint protection with advanced security features and flexible deployment. In comparison, TitanHQ SpamTitan excels in email protection with features like geo-blocking. Tech buyers seeking comprehensive security may prefer Check Point, while those prioritizing email security might choose SpamTitan.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint reviews highlight a higher setup cost compared to TitanHQ SpamTitan, known for its more affordable initial cost. This significant difference may impact small businesses' decision regarding initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint reviews highlight a higher setup cost compared to TitanHQ SpamTitan, known for its more affordable initial cost. This significant difference may impact small businesses' decision regarding initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for its pricing and ease of integration, appealing to those seeking straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET EDR/XDR offers robust features like threat hunting and customization, attracting buyers prioritizing sophisticated threat management and flexible deployment options.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET EDR/XDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally incurs higher setup costs compared to ESET EDR/XDR, which is often praised for its affordability. ESET EDR/XDR is seen as more budget-friendly, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint may require a larger initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally incurs higher setup costs compared to ESET EDR/XDR, which is often praised for its affordability. ESET EDR/XDR is seen as more budget-friendly, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint may require a larger initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in integration within its ecosystem and diverse deployment options. In comparison, Deep Instinct focuses on advanced AI-driven threat prevention, offering quick deployment and superior customer support. Buyers may prefer Check Point for comprehensive security or Deep Instinct for simplicity.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious users, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment but offers powerful threat prevention capabilities, highlighting a clear difference in their financial entry points.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious users, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment but offers powerful threat prevention capabilities, highlighting a clear difference in their financial entry points.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat emulation and centralized management, ideal for robust security needs. In comparison, OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides lightweight security with easy policy management, suited for environments requiring minimal system impact. Harmony benefits enterprises needing comprehensive security coverage, while OpenText appeals to cost-conscious small to medium businesses.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for budget-conscious users, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has a higher setup cost, suggesting a more comprehensive initial configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for budget-conscious users, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has a higher setup cost, suggesting a more comprehensive initial configuration process.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides advanced ransomware defenses and superior integration options for diverse environments. In comparison, Sophos Endpoint excels with user-friendly AI-driven threat detection. Each appeals to different preferences; Harmony for feature-rich security, Sophos for intuitive management.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Sophos Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to the more economical setup of Sophos Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to the more economical setup of Sophos Endpoint.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced anti-ransomware and seamless integration with Check Point products. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in lightweight performance with strong behavior analysis. Trend Micro appeals to SMBs, while Check Point suits setups needing comprehensive integration.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint incurs a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, making the latter more cost-effective for initial deployment. The pricing difference highlights Trend Micro's affordability in terms of initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint incurs a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, making the latter more cost-effective for initial deployment. The pricing difference highlights Trend Micro's affordability in terms of initial setup expenses.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Anti-Malware Tools
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)