No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo

Top 10 Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, and Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense surpasses its competitors by providing advanced email security with unique capabilities such as threat intelligence integration, real-time malware protection, and comprehensive reporting, ensuring robust defense against evolving email threats.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers superior threat protection with straightforward deployment and a favorable ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 excels with deep integration into the Microsoft ecosystem, providing comprehensive features despite higher initial costs, appealing to those seeking extensive platform integration.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Report
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense setup costs are generally higher due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective option for basic email threat protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense setup costs are generally higher due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective option for basic email threat protection.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection
4.2 out of 5
Proofpoint Email Protection is praised for pricing, ease of use, and advanced detection, making it ideal for users prioritizing simplicity and effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers rich features and ecosystem integrations, appealing to those seeking comprehensive, integrated solutions.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Proofpoint Email Protection Report
Proofpoint Email Protection requires a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a primary difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Proofpoint Email Protection requires a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a primary difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)
4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels in AI-driven phishing protection and seamless Microsoft integration. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers strong integration within Cisco's suite and robust sandboxing, appealing to businesses leveraging Cisco's extensive ecosystem for comprehensive email security.

Download Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Report
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration offers straightforward setup with competitive pricing, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration offers straightforward setup with competitive pricing, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced security features.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection integrates seamlessly with Windows and Office 365, offering features like anti-phishing and DLP. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides robust internal threat detection and valuable Threat Grid sandboxing, integrating with Cisco's broader security ecosystem for comprehensive protection.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting its comprehensive features.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Abnormal Security
4.7 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Abnormal Security
4.7 out of 5
Abnormal Security offers competitive pricing and excels in threat detection through behavioral analysis. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides extensive threat intelligence and advanced malware protection, with superior long-term ROI justifying its higher initial costs for comprehensive security measures.
Download Abnormal Security vs. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Report
Abnormal Security offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense can be more complex and time-consuming. The ease of implementation highlights Abnormal's user-friendly approach compared to the technical demands of configuring Cisco's solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Abnormal Security offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense can be more complex and time-consuming. The ease of implementation highlights Abnormal's user-friendly approach compared to the technical demands of configuring Cisco's solution.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortinet FortiMail
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortinet FortiMail
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiMail excels in spam detection and offers strong integration with Fortinet products. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides robust feature sets and broad deployment options. Buyers might choose FortiMail for cost-effectiveness or Cisco for comprehensive support and reliability.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Fortinet FortiMail Report
Fortinet FortiMail features straightforward setup costs, whereas Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense requires a higher initial investment for configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiMail features straightforward setup costs, whereas Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense requires a higher initial investment for configuration.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks supports secure file sharing, data transfer, and encrypted communications. Organizations benefit from SFTP transmissions, large file exchanges, and secure email. Features like antivirus protection, two-factor authentication, integration with SSO, and centralized management enhance security. User-driven controls, mobile access, and encryption keys safeguard data, although technical improvements are needed.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Kiteworks Report
It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it.
The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API.
View comparison
Pricing
It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it.
The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade
4.2 out of 5
Check Point offers strong email protection with customizable blocking policies and integration capabilities. In comparison, Cisco excels with advanced threat detection and integration features. Small businesses might opt for Check Point's affordability, while Cisco suits those seeking comprehensive security integration with existing Cisco infrastructures.
Download Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Report
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade has a simpler setup cost compared to the higher initial investment required for Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade has a simpler setup cost compared to the higher initial investment required for Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortra's Agari
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortra's Agari
4.3 out of 5
Fortra's Agari emphasizes AI-driven threat detection, focusing on phishing and business email compromise, offering affordability and streamlined deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense delivers a comprehensive feature set with robust threat intelligence, appealing to organizations seeking extensive security capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Fortra's Agari Report
Fortra's Agari typically involves higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is more cost-effective in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortra's Agari typically involves higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is more cost-effective in initial implementation.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Libraesva Email Security
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense excels in advanced threat analytics and ecosystem integration. In comparison, Libraesva Email Security offers a user-friendly interface with comprehensive filtering. Tech buyers might choose Cisco for its integrations or Libraesva for its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Libraesva Email Security Report
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is appreciated for its straightforward setup process, whereas Libraesva Email Security requires a more involved initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is appreciated for its straightforward setup process, whereas Libraesva Email Security requires a more involved initial configuration.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Comodo Secure Email Gateway
1 out of 5
Comodo Secure Email Gateway effectively filters spam and malware to enhance email security. Users appreciate its easy-to-use configuration and insightful reporting. Some areas for improvement include feature customization options and better documentation for setup assistance, addressing varying requirements for comprehensive protection.
The license cost per mailbox is around $7 per year.
View comparison
Pricing
The license cost per mailbox is around $7 per year.

Related categories

Email Security
Email Archiving
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)