No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AgilePoint vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
21st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (18th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (14th)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 2.7%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitHub CoPilot2.7%
AgilePoint1.5%
Other95.8%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface
There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"Anytime companies need any solution with workflow, they can base it on AgilePoint, because AgilePoint allows companies to design and implement workflows very fast using the system's interface."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."
"I like the design and the integration capacity, and it's also easy to use."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."
"There is absolutely a humongous return on investment with GitHub CoPilot in my organization."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
 

Cons

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Technical support is very slow to respond and they need to be quicker in getting back to clients when problems arise."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"GitHub CoPilot can be improved by making it easier, more impactful, and more accurate."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"To improve GitHub CoPilot, I believe the context window could be larger for better understanding of the current file, as it sometimes struggles with very deep structural relationships across hundreds of microservices."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is reasonable."
"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."
"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."
"It is more cost-effective than local tools."
"The solution is costly."
"It's affordable."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?
AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.
What needs improvement with AgilePoint?
There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...
What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?
I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
GitHub CoPilot can be improved by making it easier, more impactful, and more accurate. While it provides good answers now, aiming for more accuracy would enhance its effectiveness. I need it to be ...
What is your primary use case for GitHub CoPilot?
My main use case for GitHub CoPilot is during my college project, specifically a capstone project titled a gym application, a fitness tracking system, where I am creating my fitness tracking applic...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.