No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.
Sentiment score
1.0
Bitbucket Server offers cost savings, improved collaboration, and reduced maintenance, surpassing Perforce or GitLab alternatives in efficiency and value.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.
Sentiment score
5.5
Bitbucket Server support receives mixed reviews, with inconsistencies in response times but solutions generally provided eventually.
Finding the right solution becomes difficult because there are so many things that create confusion.
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
If they encounter problems beyond their scope, they contact the vendor directly.
Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.
Sentiment score
8.0
Bitbucket Server scales well for all sizes, though its interface lacks intuitiveness and may face occasional stability issues.
Bitbucket Server is quite scalable because it is a server-side solution, and we can scale it vertically easily.
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
Bitbucket Server has been working efficiently for us so far, and I would rate it an eight or nine for scalability.
Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
4.5
Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.
Sentiment score
5.3
Bitbucket Server is highly rated for stability, with occasional issues, making it a reliable choice for code management.
 

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.
Bitbucket Server needs UI improvements, better performance, enhanced integration, expanded features, and improved third-party compatibility for users.
Bitbucket Server should provide more flexible configuration for granular permissions.
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it.
Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank
Collaboration could be improved as the main aspect.
Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.
Bitbucket Server offers tiered pricing based on user count with affordable options, including a free version for public repositories.
It's probably slightly expensive, and the cost depends on what you compare it with.
Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Bitbucket Server license is affordable.
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
 

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.
Bitbucket Server offers seamless Atlassian integration, efficient code collaboration, robust version control, and competitive pricing with LDAP support.
Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort.
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration.
Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank
The pull request feature in Bitbucket Server is necessary.
Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion
Ranking in Version Control
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 9.9%, down from 25.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bitbucket Server9.9%
Apache Subversion4.2%
Other85.9%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.
Syed Fahad Anwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai
Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility
The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?
I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.
What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I w...
What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?
The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.