

OpenText Functional Testing and Apigee compete in the automation and API management sectors. OpenText, with its in-depth testing features, holds an advantage for extensive GUI and API test automation, whereas Apigee stands out in API management with advanced capabilities.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers AI-driven object identification, extensive integration options, and minimal scripting requirements, beneficial for large enterprises. Apigee provides advanced API management with robust analytics, security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management, ideal for intricate API structures.
Room for Improvement: OpenText requires better browser support and scripting capabilities, plus an improved IDE, while Apigee needs a streamlined pricing model, enhanced deployment flexibility for on-premises setups, and improved reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText primarily operates on-premises, facing installation challenges, whereas Apigee offers more flexible deployment options including hybrid setups. OpenText's support is noted for slow response, while Apigee's is efficient but costly.
Pricing and ROI: Both have premium pricing. OpenText's licensing complexity reflects its broad utility, yielding strong ROI for fully integrated applications. Apigee's pricing reflects its API management emphasis, with ROI dependent on API-driven business efficiencies despite cost considerations.
Overall, it saved engineering time and made API operations more efficient without requiring additional staffing.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
They are responsive and provide assistance even during production issues.
Customer support for Apigee is fantastic; I receive responses within a minute, which is very useful.
The customer service and support are cooperative and effective in providing insights and solutions during challenges.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
I would rate Apigee's scalability very highly; it scales well for enterprise workloads, supports high traffic, and provides features such as caching, quotas, and rate limiting, maintaining performance as usage grows.
Adding extra Cassandra databases is complex.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
Apigee only allows validation of transactions up to a four-hour period, which requires manual hovering over the date and time.
Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability.
Apigee should also incorporate these capabilities, especially in the on-premises version.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Apigee is perceived as slightly costly compared to other tools in the market.
Apigee is high-priced, suitable for large enterprises where the benefit aligns with the cost.
Apigee is costlier compared to other solutions.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It provides all the necessary capabilities for current technologies, enabling communication and translation between protocols, along with supporting stringent security features.
The standout features for me include centralized security, OAuth, JWT, API traffic management with configuration for rate limiting and quotas, caching, API analytics monitoring, and API lifecycle management.
The features for API security have been significant with Apigee.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 15.6% |
| Apigee | 2.2% |
| Other | 82.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 67 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
Apigee offers API management, analytics, and developer portals with robust security, scalability, and flexibility. Its hybrid deployment ensures data privacy, while analytics tools support insightful decision-making, making it suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive API solutions.
Apigee provides a seamless platform for managing APIs, integrating external and internal applications. It serves as an API gateway, featuring robust security and scalability, supporting OAuth and rate-limiting policies. Organizations appreciate its ease of use, integration capabilities, and documented resources. The hybrid deployment model ensures private data remains on-premise, while the orchestration layer increases security. With a drag-and-drop interface and customization options, policy management becomes straightforward. Its analytics and monitoring tools offer insights into traffic patterns and API performance. However, users desire improvements in role-based access, code versioning integration, and traffic handling. Suggestions include enhanced security, support, automation, and a more flexible pricing model.
What are Apigee's Key Features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Apigee is extensively used for developing proxies, implementing security protocols, and managing APIs. Organizations leverage its capabilities to facilitate seamless API interactions, fostering developer onboarding and API customization. The platform supports API gateways for enhanced security, scalability, and insights, proving crucial for managing extensive application networks.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.