Arcserve Cloud Direct vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Arcserve and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Arcserve is ranked #66, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Arcserve holds a 0.4% mindshare in CB, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution.

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Read 1 Arcserve Cloud Direct review

698 Views
503 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 344 HPE Zerto Software reviews

15,285 Views
7,184 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Arcserve Cloud Direct

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and Arcserve Cloud Direct are key competitors in the data protection and recovery market. HPE Zerto Software has an edge with its superior data replication abilities and ransomware recovery features, whereas Arcserve Cloud Direct is advantageous for businesses reliant on cloud infrastructure due to its robust cloud services integration.

Features: HPE Zerto Software offers seamless disaster recovery, ransomware protection, and advanced data replication options. Arcserve Cloud Direct provides strong integration with cloud services, efficient data backup capabilities, and supports businesses focusing on cloud-native environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software presents a streamlined deployment process with robust support channels for smooth operation. Arcserve Cloud Direct offers comprehensive onboarding and cloud-centric support, facilitating efficient cloud integration.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software's initial setup may be higher but promises significant ROI through its disaster recovery and cyber threat protection. Arcserve Cloud Direct offers competitive pricing with strong cloud integration value, ensuring consistent ROI for cloud-focused businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Ranking in Cloud Backup

66th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (15th)

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

344

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Arcserve Cloud Direct is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 3.0%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Zerto Software	3.0%
Arcserve Cloud Direct	0.4%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1321896

Junior Service Desk Operator at a cloud solution provider with 11-50 employees

Good backup retention but it is not a reliable platform and it doesn't giving any sort of alerts that things are not working

StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around 1 to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working. The majority of stuff wasn't backed up, so we really weren't happy with them. That's when we went on the look for a new solution.

Read full review

David Riberdy

Enterprise data management supervisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

An all-in-one and cost-efficient solution that does what it promises

Zerto is very easy to use. Installation is about half an hour, and then it starts protecting the data and VMs. It is not very cumbersome. The UI is built very well. It is fairly self-explanatory. To be able to stand up a product you have never seen in half an hour and get it functioning and protecting speaks to how good the UI and workflow are. Zerto has near-synchronous replication. As a change is made on site A, it gets copied across the network to site B. We are five or six seconds behind production. If I have a heavily used system and I use traditional backups, I could be anywhere from 5 minutes to 23 hours behind. With Zerto, I am single-digit seconds behind. That works well for us. Our disaster recovery test, which used to span an entire week, now takes two days. We used to recover our servers in the first two or three days with a backup product and then test for two days before tearing it all down. Now, we spend half a day on new servers and ensuring things work with networking, etc. We test the next day, and we are done in two days. Across the entire company, we are able to save significant man-hours by shortening the test from a week to two days. We are now doing smaller tests once a month and larger tests once a year. Zerto has reduced our DR testing time by 60% to 70%. We are also able to do more disaster recovery testing. Previously, we were doing it once a year, whereas now, we are doing smaller tests once a month and our large tests once a year. In recovery point objectives, we are single-digit seconds behind. In terms of RTOs, I can recover 350 VMs in 30 minutes. It takes less than several seconds to restore a single VM. From days to 30 minutes for 350 compared to 100 VMs is an incredible time-saving in terms of RTOs and RPOs for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The backup retention was pretty good. Being able to archive users who had been backed up, is a good functionality. Even if they've been deactivated it'll keep the backups and keep them protected."

"I found the very easy VPG setup, the easy recovery, and failover testing to be the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features, something that I wasn't even anticipating, is the file backups. We weren't even considering Zerto to do restores, but it actually is able to do that. Eventually, we could just use this as our backup solution."

"Its ease of use and scalability are valuable."

"The one-to-many replication functionality is helpful. While we were protecting our VMs in Azure, we were able to use the one-to-many feature to also replicate the same VMs to our new data center, in preparation for data center migration."

"It is pretty easy to use. The interface is intuitive and easy to use. Once you set it up, it just works. So, it is great."

"We were able to see its benefits immediately after we deployed it."

"The main reasons for adopting Zerto are data protection and being able to do disaster recovery for site recovery."

"My impressions of HPE Zerto Software's Near-Sync Replication are that it minimizes the loss of data."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around one to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working."

"Certain areas were designed and work fine for VMware but are under development for Hyper-V. Eventually, all features will work for both platforms."

"Customer service is five out of ten. There is room for improvement. We need more local support."

"Zerto could improve its reporting capabilities."

"I'm not sure if it has throttling, meaning, what's going over the wire and how we can throttle that to reduce the amount of data that's going across the bandwidth. I can't remember if that's something that's in this product. It might be in the more recent version."

"There is a problem where you need what's called a full sweep to back up and sync a VM from the beginning, which occurs in multiple steps."

"Migration of complex VMware and Hyper-V solution. Using Zerto to replicate to azure and S3."

"For what we got it for, it does it great. I use a different solution for my disk-to-disk local backups to where I can have a local backup of files. I don't think Zerto does that well to where it keeps a memory of the files that are there. Basically, when something is deleted on Zerto, it gets deleted on the replicated version. So, some sort of snapshotting or something where I could have backups at different points in time of files would be a really helpful tool."

"The backup functions are in need of improvement."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Zerto is more cost-effective than Azure."

"Pricing is adequate at the standard of the product, but there could be "always" some improvement. We would like to see a consumption model that would charge in a DR scenario, where you're failing over and consuming those resources, instead of a per-protected-node model."

"My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was straightforward."

"If it were easier to license, and to scale it out a little bit more economically, that'd be a godsend. At the end of the day, my druthers would be to have all 200 of our servers protected by this platform. But for a company our size, that stretches our IT budget and it just doesn't make economic sense."

"Zerto's price seems fair. It's competitive."

"Zerto is not overly expensive. It's worth what we're getting for it, but with tough times, a discount would be beneficial."

"The solution is very cost-effective and very easy to set-up but does not compromise on features."

"I know it is per server, but I am not fully aware of the price model. I know for our VDI environment, they are looking at something that is on the lower end and that they can use just for migrations and not so much a disaster recovery."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	90
Midsize Enterprise	87
Large Enterprise	197

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

From a pricing perspective, HPE Zerto Software is expensive in comparison to other products on the market, but I think it is an easier sell because it works so well and it is so easy to set up a de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Site Recovery vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 26% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 16% of the time

Veritas System Recovery vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 15% of the time

AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 15% of the time

More Arcserve Cloud Direct Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download Arcserve Cloud Direct product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

January 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft Cloud Services, StorageCraft Disaster Recovery Services, StorageCraft Cloud Backup, Arcserve Cloud Services, Zetta Cloud Backup

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Arcserve Cloud Direct offers comprehensive cloud-based backup and recovery services, designed to address the critical data protection needs of enterprises with scalable and efficient solutions.

Arcserve Cloud Direct enables businesses to secure their data seamlessly in the cloud, offering an intuitive platform for backups, disaster recovery, and data management. It meets the demands of businesses looking to protect valuable data assets with ease and reliability. The platform integrates with multiple IT environments, providing flexible data protection without significant infrastructure modifications.

What are the key features of Arcserve Cloud Direct?

Scalable Backup: Allows businesses to adjust storage capacity as needed, offering flexible data protection.
Fast Recovery: Ensures quick data restoration to minimize downtime and operational disruptions.
Centralized Management: Provides a single interface for overseeing multiple backup and recovery operations.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by eliminating the need for costly hardware and maintenance.
Enhanced Security: Offers robust data protection features, safeguarding critical business data against loss.
Improved Reliability: Provides dependable data backup and recovery, ensuring business continuity.

Arcserve Cloud Direct is widely implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where data protection is paramount. It supports regulatory compliance and helps these industries maintain data integrity and availability in a dynamic business environment.

Arcserve

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Lion

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.