No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Arkivum vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Arkivum
Ranking in File Archiving
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (39th)
OpenText Content Manager
Ranking in File Archiving
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (10th), Document Management Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of Arkivum is 2.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 6.8%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Content Manager6.8%
Arkivum2.4%
Other90.8%
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

Use Arkivum?
Leave a review
AH
Enterprise Information Manager in Practice at Mannai
Improved content management with good reliability and an easy setup
We are a system integrator. We deal with client requirements to determine the best solutions that should be deployed. Our primary use case for OpenText Content Manager is managing enterprise content, such as documents and emails, as well as engineering document management OpenText Content Manager…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Content Manager?
We are a system integrator. We deal with client requirements to determine the best solutions that should be deployed. Our primary use case for OpenText Content Manager is managing enterprise conten...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Missouri State Courts
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, OpenText, Quest Software and others in File Archiving. Updated: August 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.