Aruba Access Points vs Mojo Networks comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while Arista is ranked #24. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Aruba Access Points

Read 40 Aruba Access Points reviews

2,027 Views
2,027 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

991 Views
971 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Aruba Access Points

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Mojo Networks and Aruba Access Points are competing products in the wireless network solutions category. While Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing and robust cloud management, Aruba Access Points often provide superior features and perceived value.

Features: Mojo Networks offers a cloud-based architecture, exceptional security with WIPS, and Cognitive WiFi analytics that enhance troubleshooting and reduce staffing needs. Aruba Access Points provide advanced network mobility, seamless handshaking capabilities, and robust warranty with impressive performance.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could enhance hardware variety to cater to diverse environments, improve integration with third-party solutions, and offer more advanced support for complex configurations. Aruba Access Points might benefit from more competitive initial pricing, streamline initial setup procedures, and enhance user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mojo Networks simplifies deployment through its cloud infrastructure, minimizing on-premises hardware needs. Aruba Access Points offer comprehensive support services that aid complex configurations, though they might require a more involved initial setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks appeals with budget-friendly initial costs, emphasizing cost-effectiveness in enhancing network capabilities. In contrast, Aruba Access Points justify higher upfront costs with superior long-term performance and network stability, ensuring substantial return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Access Points is 3.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Aruba Access Points	3.2%
Mojo Networks	1.1%
Other	95.7%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Hurmi-Jürjens

Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia

Wireless connectivity has remained reliable and supports flexible, cloud‑independent management

As I already mentioned, the ability to stay with self-hosting solutions for central management is what I think could be improved about Aruba Access Points. If this becomes available in the future, I think it should change the game. However, I don't currently see this because I see nothing about AirWave anymore on your roadmap. I don't understand what happens next. There are some problems in assessing the performance of Aruba Access Points in environments with high user density. If there is a dense environment, a mobility controller would be the one you should go with because this needs more telemetry to calculate. I suspect this will be easier to do with local administration or local management because if everything goes over the internet through Aruba Central, it takes time. Every decision the central management makes takes extra latency to send over to the local area network. I think this is not a good approach to move to central management that is hosted somewhere far away. It should still retain the functionality to use Instant AP functionality that is available until 500 and maybe 600 as well. If you go to software version 10 and future versions, then you lose this functionality and you can't go back anymore. It would be good to assist with local location management and BLE-based functionalities as additional features I expect from future Aruba Access Points. There were some attempts to support third-party integrations through cooperation between Aruba and Meridian. However, I don't understand what happened there, and nothing is clear in this area. IoT will also be very important for people. You should add functionality to the platform that will support third-party IoT devices.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interest funds are valuable."

"Aruba's virtual controller is the most important feature."

"Aruba Access Points provides secure and transparent access points for all users"

"Aruba access points protect connectivity, and we don't get interference."

"It is a stable solution."

"Aruba is a controller-based solution. We have some multi-story buildings. We only need to maintain one controller, and we can manage it from a single IP address."

"It offers remarkable client-handling capacity."

"The solution gives good visibility into access points."

More Aruba Access Points pros

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"Their Cognitive WiFi analytics (Mojo Aware) is the biggest feature on their dashboard. It helps us know where the problem, so we don't have to spend time with the customer diagnosing it."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"They should reduce the prices as an advanced marketing tool."

"The licensing models lack clarity."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The platform’s speed for data flow could be better."

"In Aruba Access Points, the security part is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I have to go via HP's process, which is not as good as Aruba's used to be."

"AI is a buzzword here without substance."

"The disadvantage of Aruba Access Points is experienced by me when I need it to offer me a long range of coverage."

More Aruba Access Points cons

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is available in the market at a reasonable price"

"The product is cheaper than Cisco and Huawei."

"The product is costly and comes with a lifetime license. There is neither renewal nor subscription. It is a one-time solution."

"The solution's pricing is nominal and not as costly as Cisco's."

"The product's licensing cost is low. However, hardware is costly. Thus, it is overall expensive."

"The solution is expensive and licensing costs are yearly. Customers have to pay extra costs for service and subscription apart from the hardware cost."

"Aruba Central is a bit overpriced for some customers."

"The product's pricing could be better than one of its competitors."

More Aruba Access Points pricing and cost advice

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Access Points?

After we installed the Aruba switches, the work became faster because the network speed improved.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Access Points?

When comparing pricing between Aruba Access Points and Forti, I find Aruba to be on the higher side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Access Points?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 28% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 6% of the time

More Aruba Access Points Competitors

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points

March 2026

Download Aruba Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Aruba Access Points are a preferred choice for enterprises, providing efficient wireless connectivity across corporate settings, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities with both indoor and outdoor deployment options.

Aruba Access Points deliver reliable Wi-Fi and network access tailored for enterprise and guest connectivity, supporting IoT devices in diverse environments such as warehouses and offices. They ensure secure connections with features like VPN management and 802.1x authentication, along with flexibility in deployment. Users can benefit from their robust warranty, ease of use, and seamless integration possibilities. The devices facilitate convenient management through both on-premise and cloud solutions, although there is a need for improved coverage, security, and integration features.

What are the standout features of Aruba Access Points?

Virtual Controller: Manages multiple Access Points without additional hardware.
Client Match: Ensures devices connect to the best access point available.
Seamless Roaming: Provides uninterrupted connectivity without drop-offs.
Integration Capabilities: Allows easy incorporation of enterprise wireless solutions.
Advanced Authentication: Offers 802.1x and secure guest access.

What benefits or ROI can users look for?

High Stability: Consistent performance minimizes downtime.
Simple Configuration: Easy setup saves time and resources.
Network Mobility: Supports movement with uninterrupted access.
Visibility: Provides network insights for better management.
Warranty and Support: Offers robust warranty terms.

In specific industries, Aruba Access Points are implemented to enhance patient record access and guest connectivity in healthcare, support interactive learning environments in education, and streamline operations in warehouses with IoT integration. Their deployment aligns with industry-specific requirements, ensuring reliable connectivity and secure access to critical applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

March 2026

Free Report: Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.