No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Atlassian Confluence vs Limeade ONE [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian Confluence
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
109
Ranking in other categories
Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (2nd), Enterprise Social Software (3rd), Knowledge Management Software (2nd)
Limeade ONE [EOL]
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Talha Hussain. - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Manage projects effectively with seamless task tracking and integration, but deployment requires familiarity
We are conducting all our project management using Atlassian tools. We use Atlassian Confluence for task management, reporting, visualization of tasks, and reviewing the progress of tickets and work I use Atlassian Confluence for task management and other project management tasks, such as…
it_user671481 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Architect, Digital Workplace Consultant at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques.
Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques. Expert browser that allows you to quickly find colleagues with proper experience. Ideation that enables internal crowdsourcing and innovation scenarios The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The sharing of information and simple formatting are valuable features. That is, there are no templates, and everything uses one format. This means that people don't need to worry about formatting."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I would recommend Confluence, especially for anyone that is using other Atlassian products."
"The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"It has improved collaboration, transparency, and documentation quality among teams."
"Confluence is scalable. Our company has 1,000 employees, and we're growing."
"Many people enjoy its zero learning-curve.​"
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"We have had success with deploying Newsgator's social functionality on top of our SharePoint environment."
"Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques."
 

Cons

"The Atlassian cloud pricing model is pretty steep. Confluence should be accessible by a relatively large audience, but the pricing model prohibits this."
"The one way in which this solution could be improved is by offering better design and UI."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"I've always found search to be buggy."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"Atlassian Confluence is not really a community-friendly solution."
"When we import the data in Confluence from Word or any other document, the formatting is not correct."
"The OOB user interface should be enhanced to be more user-friendly and responsive."
"Need to improve their mobile / smartphone apps by adding more functionality."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the paid version. My company has purchased it for company employees. We are using Confluence as a company. I don't know how much it costs, but its price is good enough. Its price is not so high."
"For us, it's free to use. We don't pay any licensing."
"Confluence charges an extra fee for analytics."
"The product is neither cheap nor expensive, meaning its price falls somewhere in the mid-range zone."
"The issues I have with the pricing are in respect to the add-ons."
"In my opinion, it's worth the investment"
"We pay $350 a month to use the solution."
"This is a very expensive solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise54
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian Confluence?
Money is a factor because Atlassian Confluence is not free. I need to purchase extra components when adding new projects or employees.
What needs improvement with Atlassian Confluence?
Much of the room for improvement lies not with the tool itself but with how people are using it. In many cases where we have had issues, it has been based on the lack of structure. The company usin...
What is your primary use case for Atlassian Confluence?
We are using Jira as an asset management and ticketing system along with Confluence. We have significant portions of the Atlassian system implemented. Atlassian Confluence is used as a Wiki for Jir...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Confluence
Social Sites, Sitrion Social Sites
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, Skype, Microsoft, NASA, Netflix, Adobe, Bonobos, LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
BitBurger, Daiichi-Sankyo, ING, Mercer, Merck, NSN, Renault, Stockland, Unisys
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.