No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BigPanda vs ITRS Geneos comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.5
BigPanda surpasses Netcool in efficiency, reducing resources and enhancing incident resolution and recovery times for heavy users.
Sentiment score
8.1
ITRS Geneos boosts system stability, reduces downtime, and enhances decision-making with real-time dashboards and proactive alerts.
BigPanda offers significant time-saving, cost-saving, and resource-saving benefits.
Technical Lead
BigPanda saves time with its advanced features and manages large environments while requiring fewer resources compared to our previous tool, Netcool.
Software Engineer at Trianz
Resource count has probably reduced by about ten to twenty percent due to the reduced incident count, which enables me to identify issues faster, meaning business recovery is quicker.
Director Of Engineering at Broadcom Inc.
With respect to post-mortems during incidents, it really helps during root cause analysis.
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
BigPanda's support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, despite occasional delays, with some users noting communication issues.
Sentiment score
7.9
ITRS Geneos's customer service is praised for prompt and expert issue resolution, knowledgeable staff, and proactive technical support.
If BigPanda can consistently provide such competent contacts, I would rate the support ten out of ten, otherwise, it is an eight out of ten.
Engineer - Cloud and Infrastructure Services at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Companies like CoreLogix, which is a log platform, achieve ten out of ten due to their responsiveness.
CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd
For technical support, we have only had to address password resets and alert mismatching.
Technical Lead
I would rate 9 out of 10 with respect to ITRS Geneos's support, support metrics, and their support delivery.
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
BigPanda efficiently scales across environments, managing numerous alerts and servers, with high ratings despite occasional peak-time delays.
Sentiment score
4.8
ITRS Geneos excels in scalability but may require manual efforts and faces challenges with vertical scaling and large estates.
It handles large volumes of alerts without limitations.
We manage a large environment with over 50,000 servers and various monitoring tools like Dynatrace, New Relic, Splunk, Nagios, and Datadog.
Software Engineer at Trianz
I rate the scalability of BigPanda at eight.
Manager Observability at ICE
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
BigPanda is stable with slight slowdowns; users request intuitive features, appreciate communication, and note improved stability and task management.
Sentiment score
7.9
ITRS Geneos is stable and reliable with resolved issues, ensuring effective performance and resilience even with increasing demands.
BigPanda is now stable.
I would rate the availability of BigPanda at nine because it's almost 99.99% available.
Manager Observability at ICE
However, when handling critical traffic, the BigPanda site can slow down, which we manage with a load balancer.
Software Engineer at Trianz
The product is really capable of handling large volume data.
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
 

Room For Improvement

BigPanda requires AI enhancements, bug fixes, improved usability, expanded features, and better integration to address cost and performance issues.
ITRS Geneos users seek improved features, including visualization, documentation, integration, scalability, mobile access, AI, and enhanced UI.
A 'deep dive' analysis feature would be appreciated to give detailed insights such as CPU usage and disk space analysis.
It would be beneficial if BigPanda leveraged AI to solve critical issues related to editing and sending alerts based on enrichment mapping files.
Software Engineer at Trianz
If BigPanda could integrate AI, it would enhance the platform significantly by offering chatbot functionality within the BigPanda UI.
Engineer - Cloud and Infrastructure Services at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Modern cloud platforms and data cloud platforms require more attention from the product.
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
 

Setup Cost

BigPanda offers competitive pricing and flexible licensing, benefiting high-growth companies with potential costs reaching $200,000 annually.
ITRS Geneos pricing is high, but customizable features and negotiations can justify costs, especially in banking.
The pricing for BigPanda is reasonable compared to other event management tools, given its advantages.
Software Engineer at Trianz
There are indirect costs related to managing open-source products, leading to resource investment in maintaining the dashboards for these capabilities.
Director Of Engineering at Broadcom Inc.
 

Valuable Features

BigPanda enhances incident management with AI-driven analysis, reducing response times via integration and alert consolidation for improved reliability.
Geneos provides real-time monitoring and adaptability with customizable dashboards, enhancing enterprise efficiency in trading and system management.
Its automation has significantly improved incident response times, reducing the process to within one minute.
It can correlate multiple issues within a single device, create a single incident, and thus reduce noise and provide faster resolution.
Manager Observability at ICE
BigPanda improves service reliability with instant resolution, increased uptime, and reduced mean time to resolution, thus enhancing service quality.
Technical Lead
The advantages and strong points of ITRS Geneos for me personally are seamless integration with existing systems as well as upcoming modern systems.
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
 

Categories and Ranking

BigPanda
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (10th), AIOps (9th)
ITRS Geneos
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
51st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (47th), Network Monitoring Software (72nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of BigPanda is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BigPanda0.6%
ITRS Geneos0.9%
Other98.5%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd
Automated incident workflows have reduced alert noise and now improve response efficiency
In my opinion, the best feature of BigPanda is its speed in terms of deployment. It has very strong integration with all of the major platforms and workflows that organizations need. The biggest customers are enterprises like HSBC and Barclays. Implementing something effective for them that dramatically reduces meantime to repair and the number of incidents is substantially difficult, as projects can often extend three years with very small results. BigPanda is different; it is a tool relied on by many enterprises, fitting over existing toolsets rather than trying to replace them, which makes it non-competitive to many existing alerts and monitoring tools. It enhances existing systems to provide actionable intelligence for business solutions.
Ravi ShankarSundarasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder
Real-time monitoring has improved incident response and supports proactive anomaly detection
The advantages and strong points of ITRS Geneos for me personally are seamless integration with existing systems as well as upcoming modern systems. The user interface is really good. From a management point of view, these are the key aspects with respect to the user interface and seamless integration. We get very good community support for this product. ITRS Geneos has impacted my organization positively, and I would rate it 4.5 out of 5.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
58%
Construction Company
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise40
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigPanda?
Regarding extra expenses, I pay more for communication and do not incur costs for another dashboard perspective, but there are indirect costs related to managing open-source products, leading to re...
What needs improvement with BigPanda?
Something that comes to mind regarding improvements is communication, as I rely heavily on another tool. If BigPanda could provide communication capabilities beyond just sending notifications—such ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?
I do not have the pricing information because it lies with the finance team.
What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?
I do not see much room for improvement. Support for data cloud platforms could be great. Modern cloud platforms and data cloud platforms require more attention from the product.
What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?
I was using ITRS Geneos at HSBC. I have been using this product for more than two years. I have 20 years of experience working in IT with software in general. I am working with an on-premises deplo...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Geneos
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nagios, ServiceNow, ITSM, NOC, CMDB Evolved, RemedyIncident Management Process
ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.
Find out what your peers are saying about BigPanda vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.