BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.4, while WithSecure is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.3. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

3,283 Views
2,496 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,702 Views
1,291 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance and WithSecure Elements compete in the cybersecurity segment, particularly in malware detection and protection. BlackBerry seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced AI-driven protection and resource efficiency, which provides proactive security measures, whereas WithSecure offers robust network-based protection and script security, catering to comprehensive update management.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance's AI-driven protection and low resource consumption are effective against zero-day threats without constant updates. It uses CylancePROTECT and CylanceOPTICS for advanced scanning, ensuring long-term accuracy. The machine-learning approach is key to longevity. WithSecure Elements enhances script and malware detection through AMSI and DeepGuard, providing robust network-based protection and efficient vulnerability management across devices.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance needs to enhance false positive management, improve reporting features, and integrate better with industrial systems. Its user interface and mobile protection could also be improved. WithSecure Elements should enhance its patch management and optimize resource consumption to avoid affecting system performance. Users also seek better third-party integration and more detailed threat analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance supports versatile deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds with generally positive customer service. Reports on technical support responsiveness vary. WithSecure Elements offers consistent deployment support across public and private clouds, praised for responsive customer service and strong customer relations.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance pricing is average, offering solid ROI through reduced security breaches and lower labor costs due to automation, although it is considered expensive by some. WithSecure Elements presents cost-effective solutions for bulk licensing, ensuring ROI by efficient threat management. Its scalable pricing caters to diverse enterprise needs.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."

"The most valuable features of CylancePROTECT are its powerful machine-learning capabilities and predictive intelligence."

"Its setup is simple if you have a Windows device; it is executable."

"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."

"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"The most functional item that we use is the process to turn off the false flags that it causes."

"The solution runs in the background, and I do not need to care about it."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

Cons

"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."

"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."

"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."

"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."

"The solution’s user interface could be improved."

"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."

"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."

"CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The product has average pricing."

"The price is comparable."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 34% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 14% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

May 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

April 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.