BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.5. BlackBerry holds a 1.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

2,960 Views
2,664 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,518 Views
1,503 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance and WithSecure Elements compete in the cybersecurity category. BlackBerry Cylance seems to have the upper hand due to its strong AI-driven endpoint protection and minimal resource consumption.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers powerful AI and machine learning for malware detection and blocking, including zero-day threats. It employs a lightweight agent that minimizes system resource usage and functions efficiently without daily signature updates. A centralized dashboard enhances management efficiency. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, on the other hand, provides robust application and script monitoring features such as AMSI and DeepGuard, offering comprehensive endpoint security and excelling in vulnerability detection and patch management.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance users report frequent false positives and desire a more user-friendly management console, enhanced reporting capabilities, and reduced pricing. Additionally, better integration, configuration support, and historical data functionalities are sought. WithSecure Elements users wish for improved resource consumption, more real-time responses, better third-party integration, and enhanced technical partner support, especially in regions like the Middle East.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance supports a variety of deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments such as public, private, and hybrid clouds. Their customer service receives mixed reviews, with medium-rated technical support due to responsiveness issues. WithSecure Elements primarily offers deployment on-premises and in private and public clouds. Its customer service is rated excellent, with responsive and efficient technical support.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is considered affordable but somewhat high-priced compared to competitors, with a cost usually scaling with the number of endpoints for flexibility. Users experience mixed ROI but value the security offered. WithSecure Elements is seen as cost-effective, particularly when licenses are bought in bulk, with scalability providing further savings. Its ROI is noted as substantial, ensuring efficiency and security management.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.2%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most functional item that we use is the process to turn off the false flags that it causes."

"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."

"The solution runs in the background, and I do not need to care about it."

"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."

"It does a good job of protecting us."

"Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push."

"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."

"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

Cons

"I'd like them to do software distribution too, but they said that that's architecturally not at the product line."

"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."

"Making the dashboards a bit modern to make them easier to search would also be helpful."

"The user interface is outdated."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be more competitive."

"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."

"The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting."

"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

"The initial end-point cost may seem a little high (~$55/device/year) but when you look at the total peace of mind that the solution provides, with no reboots for updates, and negligible performance impact, it is well worth it."

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The tool is not that expensive."

"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Comms Service Provider

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

January 2026

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.