BMC TrueSight vs Catchpoint comparison

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,595 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC TrueSight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 3, 2025

Catchpoint and BMC TrueSight compete in the IT monitoring and management sector. Catchpoint has the edge with its robust synthetic monitoring, while BMC TrueSight excels in offering a comprehensive IT management suite.

Features: Catchpoint provides extensive synthetic monitoring capabilities with advanced alerting and transaction monitoring, coupled with seamless integration for external tools, offering detailed analytics for performance insights. BMC TrueSight features a complete IT management suite with exceptional event management, integration across diverse systems, and a holistic view of IT infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight can improve by simplifying deployment processes, enhancing reporting capabilities, and improving cloud monitoring efficiency, as users find it resource-intensive in complex environments. Catchpoint should focus on enhancing UI design and minimizing manual processes for script updates and performance analysis. Users also desire more global monitoring options and competitive pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight's on-premises nature can complicate deployment and scalability, with customer service experiences varying. In contrast, Catchpoint offers flexibility with both cloud and on-premises options, resulting in less complex deployments and more responsive customer service, with rapid adaptation to feedback.

Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight is seen as a high-cost option with a complex licensing model. It necessitates a substantial upfront investment but aids in operational cost reduction over time. Catchpoint employs a points-based pricing system, considered high by some but transparent, appealing to large enterprises while users suggest cost optimizations to match competitors better.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight vs. Catchpoint Report (Updated: August 2025).

BMC TrueSight vs. Catchpoint

Download the complete report

Helped 866,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th), AIOps (5th)

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

38th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (58th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BMC TrueSight Operations Management	0.7%
Catchpoint	0.6%
Other	98.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ayobanji Iluyomade

IT Service Performance Manager at MTN

The solution is stable and can be used for monitoring and managing events, but it does not provide application or service monitoring features

We are moving from basic monitoring to AIOps, where we can do things like self-healing. We also want to create dashboards for IT and business users to show the status of their services. We have done a couple of demos. I recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

Read full review

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at Capgemini

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We're using native monitoring capabilities for all our server hardware, for visibility for applications, for URLs, for webpage response and accuracy, and for monitoring network throughput in a lot of particular instances. We're using lightweight protocols for pinging, for DNS, for LDAP."

"The initial setup of BMC TrueSight Operations Management was easy."

"I use the solution to monitor servers, databases, Windows, Linux, and web services."

"The event management tool builds correlation logic and protection algorithms into a field of events that is valuable when a data center goes down."

"The solution provides visibility to our infrastructure, how it is, the resources we are monitoring, and quick updates when it has any problems. We have integrated it with ServiceNow to open instances."

"It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment."

"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."

"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"

More BMC TrueSight pros

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"During business hours, it has worked absolutely fine without any issues."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

More Catchpoint pros

Cons

"We were somewhat limited in TrueSight due to some of the RBAC controls not quite being what we wanted as far as delegating out administrative privileges for implementation. But because we were able to turn requests around pretty well, that burden wasn't too heavy."

"Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles."

"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."

"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."

"Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter."

"Cost is an issue with BMC TrueSight Operations Management."

"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."

"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."

More BMC TrueSight cons

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

More Catchpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay license fees of between $150 and $200 per asset. There is an enterprise software license fee, and then you pay a percentage for your maintenance, and then Premier Support. For example, if you buy a two-year license for the product, then the maintenance fee is added to that for two years at X percent a year. Then there's a small fee on top of that for Premier Support..."

"Pricing is all volume-driven. I think we were paying between $80 and $85 per license. That's per unit, for a perpetual license. You pay it one time and then, every year, you pay 20 percent of that for annual maintenance and support. But now that we've grown, we've purchased tens of thousands of licenses and the cost per license has gone down to something like less than $30..."

"Pricing is very high."

"Use conservative figures. In terms of hardware, monitored servers and also effort. The product is not cheap. But as with other products, you get what you pay for."

"We're end-of-lifeing it now. Overall, the licensing costs of BMC are a challenge for us in that they're hard costs, whereas open-source monitoring has soft costs, where it's harder to line-item."

"There is a big upfront cost when you buy the license, then there is annual maintenance. We look at, if I bought a license and paid for maintenance for five years, then average it out, what would be my monthly cost. We have had some of the competing tools come in around four dollars. This is coming in as a premium, which is why I don't have it deployed as I would like it. Therefore, we're in negotiations right now. If I can get it down to the four dollar range, I will triple my deployment in a year and a half."

"Though I have no clue about the tool's actual price, I know that it is astronomical."

"Annual licensing amount depends on the customers requirements. Support is an additional fee and there are options for three and five year support."

More BMC TrueSight pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Retailer

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

The solution provides visibility to our infrastructure, how it is, the resources we are monitoring, and quick updates when it has any problems. We have integrated it with ServiceNow to open instances.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

Though I have no clue about the tool's actual price, I know that it is astronomical.

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

Cost is an issue with BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Though I am not responsible for the budget, I know that it is an expensive tool set when used only for event management. The tool's issue ...

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Dynatrace vs BMC TrueSight

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 15% of the time

Centreon vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Competitors

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 25% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 15% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Product Reports

BMC TrueSight

Download BMC TrueSight product report

Download Catchpoint product report

Also Known As

ProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations Management

No data available

Overview

BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and seamless integration, providing comprehensive monitoring across varied infrastructures through its centralized console and Knowledge Modules.

BMC TrueSight delivers robust event management capabilities with seamless integration and comprehensive monitoring of diverse infrastructures. Its single console simplifies management, offering automated triage for standardized alerts, enhancing efficiency. Knowledge Modules support services from hardware to cloud, while proactive monitoring and capacity optimization enhance customization. It efficiently supports mixed environments by providing detailed insights and intelligently routing alerts to reduce noise. While improvements are needed in deployment, integration, AI, automation, reporting, and complexity reduction, it still meets diverse operational needs effectively.

What are BMC TrueSight's key features?

Robust Event Management: Offers efficient handling of events.
Seamless Integration: Integrates easily with existing systems.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports hardware to cloud infrastructure.
Centralized Console: Simplifies management processes.
Automated Triage: Standardizes alerts for better efficiency.
Proactive Monitoring: Improves forecasting and issue prevention.
Capacity Optimization: Efficiently manages resources.
Customizability: Tailors to specific service needs.

What benefits and ROI should users seek in BMC TrueSight?

Enhanced Proactive Management: Reduces downtime through efficient monitoring.
Improved Troubleshooting: Provides visibility into systems for quick issue resolution.
Effective Integration: Blends well with other tools and platforms.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes use of infrastructure and servers.
Global Support: Facilitates operations across sectors worldwide.

BMC TrueSight is widely used in performance and availability monitoring for infrastructure and applications, supporting the monitoring of servers, databases, networks, and IT environments. It is implemented to improve management and reduce downtime, serving needs in data centers and cloud services. Organizations leverage it for event management, comprehensive data center monitoring, and cloud services, using its capabilities for alerting, ticket creation, troubleshooting, and compliance, enhancing operational efficiency globally.

BMC

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Sample Customers

Ensono, Transamerica, Boston Scientific, Park Place Technologies, inContact, TD Ameritrade, PNC Bank

Information Not Available

BMC TrueSight vs. Catchpoint