Box vs Cloudinary comparison

Box and Cloudinary are both solutions in the Digital Asset Management category. Box is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cloudinary is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Box holds a 3.6% mindshare in DAM, compared to Cloudinary’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Box users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cloudinary users who would recommend it.

Box

Read 43 Box reviews

6,378 Views
383 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cloudinary

Read 16 Cloudinary reviews

1,246 Views
797 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Box

Cloudinary

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Box and Cloudinary are prominent in the field of digital asset management and file collaboration. Box holds an advantage in secure file sharing and compliance, while Cloudinary excels in media asset optimization and transformation.

Features: Box offers secure file sharing, collaboration tools for both personal and enterprise users, and comprehensive integrations with platforms like Microsoft Office. Cloudinary is known for its media asset management capabilities, including image and video optimization through powerful APIs and efficient media-specific tasks.

Room for Improvement: Box could enhance its search functionality, provide better local device sync options, and improve bulk action capabilities. Cloudinary would benefit from an improved interface for easier navigation, a more straightforward initial setup process, and more flexible pricing structures to support scaling businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box supports flexible deployment across public, private, and on-premises models, with generally praised customer service, though some inefficiencies exist. Cloudinary is primarily deployed on public clouds, offering ease in general deployment but encountering challenges in scaling. Customer service feedback is positive, indicating satisfactory user experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Box provides competitive pricing with options from free to enterprise plans, delivering significant value despite high initial costs. Discounts for enterprises are common. Cloudinary offers generous free plans but presents scalability challenges with fixed pricing as user base grows. Both platforms demonstrate positive ROI through efficiencies and time savings, with Box adding notable compliance risk reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed Box vs. Cloudinary Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Box vs. Cloudinary

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Box

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (10th), Cloud Storage (11th), Document Management Software (6th), Content Collaboration Platforms (8th)

Cloudinary

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Content Creation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Digital Asset Management category, the mindshare of Box is 3.6%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cloudinary is 3.4%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cloudinary	3.4%
Box	3.6%
Other	93.0%

Digital Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Chirag Morajkar

Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees

Structured cloud storage has streamlined document collaboration and automated workflows

The biggest friction point I have encountered with Box is mainly the pricing part; I think five dollars for this platform is not necessarily justified. While I have used it for integrating and using it as a cloud platform, I have not encountered any significant negative aspects. A few times, I might have faced performance issues, but I am uncertain whether that was due to the automation platform or Box itself. Overall, the only thing I could mention is that it can take a little time to understand how the integration works with Box; setup and figuring out what can and cannot be done might take some time, but other than that, I do not think anything else bothered me. One thing I would want Box to introduce to improve the platform and make it stand out even more would be incorporating AI. For example, the only way to identify documents shared in Box currently is by their names, and if those names are not precise, I can get confused. If Box had an AI feature to summarize and identify documents based on their contents, it would significantly enhance usability. AI is essential for making work easier, so that would be an excellent addition to the platform.

Read full review

Josue BYIRINGIRO

ATLP Technical Mentor at Andela

Saves time and resources and has a clear dashboard

I like the tool best because it's straightforward and doesn't have too many complicated options like AWS. The dashboard is clear - you create a directory, get credentials, and then use those in your Node.js or Java application to access resources. With AWS, you have to consider many things, like bucket policies and user permissions. It doesn't have these complications. Everything on Cloudinary is clearer than other platforms I've seen. It is very easy to use. It's easier than the AWS platforms I've seen. Even general developers can use it, while AWS needs more experience. The solution saves time and resources in several ways. It's easy to get started with, saving time from the beginning. You can implement file uploads in about thirty minutes without complications. The SDK and APIs provided to access their resources are simple and not complicated. Cloudinary is also a popular platform with good documentation and community support, making it easy to find solutions to problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features of Box for me include the structured file organizing, which is the most important part I found, and apart from that, secure sharing and integration with automation platforms, along with its smooth integration and usage in automations, is a very big plus for me."

"The features I have found to be most helpful over other cloud storage platforms are: Collaboration - just not that it exists, but it is easy and user friendly, allowing data that is necessary to be worked on to be brought to the surface; Security - focus on compliance, encryption, enterprise grade management; 3rd Party Integrations - allowing for Box to truly be a platform to be used with other software."

"The ease of using Box on multi-platforms, including my phone and tablet, along with the collaboration features means I've been able to use it with my family (including my non-tech-savvy parents) for simple sharing, as well as with colleagues for team collaboration."

"The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization."

"Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint."

"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box."

"Most amazingly its integration with Office 365 (online) is one of the best features it has other than integrating with other apps like Salesforce, etc."

"The interface is very good."

More Box pros

"I recommend Cloudinary to other users because Amazon is a bit expensive for me."

"I like the tool best because it's straightforward and doesn't have too many complicated options like AWS. The dashboard is clear - you create a directory, get credentials, and then use those in your Node.js or Java application to access resources. With AWS, you have to consider many things, like bucket policies and user permissions. It doesn't have these complications. Everything on Cloudinary is clearer than other platforms I've seen. It is very easy to use. It's easier than the AWS platforms I've seen. Even general developers can use it, while AWS needs more experience."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to upload images quickly and retrieve URLs. It integrates well with code, providing a seamless experience."

"The most important advantage of using Cloudinary is that it is very easy to integrate with the SDK, especially with Node.js."

"I like its ease of implementation. I can easily call the API into my platform and use it to upload images from the machine to the server."

"Cloudinary automatically optimizes the images for the browser, so instead of making a choice yourself for images like JPEG, PNG, AVIF, or WEBP, the client or end user's browser might support them, but Cloudinary takes that decision for you, and it just serves the right image or the best-optimized image, which is sort of safe."

"I use the solution for posting images."

"As a developer, I find Cloudinary valuable because it provides many opportunities for building applications. For example, I recently created an AI application that can read images and automatically generate captions, which helps in describing images or videos without manual input. Cloudinary's APIs support this functionality and enhance my development process. One of the most beneficial features of Cloudinary is its asset management capabilities. I can tag and categorize images and videos based on their content, such as tagging videos where a person is wearing glasses. This helps in organizing and managing media effectively. I have experimented with Cloudinary's automation capabilities, but I am still learning and haven't fully explored its potential. Currently, I want to use Cloudinary to improve user engagement with my videos, such as tracking who is viewing and interacting with my media. This is a feature I plan to explore more in the future."

More Cloudinary pros

Cons

"Technical support has some room for improvement, but nothing insurmountable."

"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."

"The biggest friction point I have encountered with Box is mainly the pricing part; I think five dollars for this platform is not necessarily justified."

"I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users."

"The search features and role permissions are not very user friendly. It only searches the first few pages of a document, which is quite a problem."

"Sometimes, their website doesn't work properly."

"I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable."

"One thing that Box would benefit from is a records management component."

More Box cons

"I haven't really thought about what improvements I’d like to see in Cloudinary recently. One thing that comes to mind is the capability for hosting very large video files, similar to platforms like YouTube. Cloudinary is not as widely known for video uploads as other platforms, and it would be great if it had a larger user base for this purpose. Apart from marketing and video uploading, I haven't identified specific features or functionalities that need improvement. It’s been a while since I actively used Cloudinary, and I’m just starting to get back into it. Once I’m more familiar with it again, I’ll have a better idea of any gaps or areas for enhancement. I’ll need to think more about this and might provide feedback later."

"Looking at its credits, I think Cloudinary can be scalable. However, when you compare it to the AWS S3 bucket, you have more options for scalability with AWS."

"The user interface of Cloudinary needs improvement."

"There are some things the product can improve in its UI."

"The solution should be made more user-friendly because sometimes it's hard to understand."

"The AI can't edit the image. If Cloudinary can add a way or a module that can generate the image, then you won't need to upload images to it."

"The high price of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It blocked our account, prevented us from uploading files, and showed a message about file adjustments."

More Cloudinary cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing may seem steep at first, but delve into the features and you'll soon realize it is incredible value for what you get."

"My organization pays for the license."

"Box needs to improve with their pricing in terms of licensing costs."

"Our pricing and licensing is excellent. I'd tell all Higher Ed customers to talk with Internet2 for excellent pricing and support."

"I'm in Higher Ed, so we purchase through Internet2-Net+. I absolutely recommend going that route for Higher Ed customers."

"There's a free version that allows you to use it with almost full-feature access. Even in the free version, it gives you all you need."

"A business account has a minimum of three users. If you are more than three people in-house, go for the Enterprise version. All the external users are free of charge."

"The more you dig, the deeper the level of tools, and the more expensive it becomes."

More Box pricing and cost advice

"We decided to quit using Cloudinary after two years because we were getting a lot of users, and it was becoming expensive. Cloudinary had fixed charges, so if we agreed to pay 500 USD per month, it would be the same whether we used high or low resources. They would notify us if we exceeded our limit, but not if we used less—however, AWS charges according to usage, which became more cost-effective for us as we grew. With AWS, you might pay 100 one month and 200 the next, depending on your usage."

"The solution’s pricing is moderate."

"I have not used the product's paid subscription, as the free tier is sufficient for most users."

"For us, the price is okay."

"If you are just starting out, the tool is actually free. You don't have to pay any fee, except if you have a large volume of files and documents you want to host."

"I use the free plan, and that is enough for one or two websites. Though I felt that the product price is reasonable, I don't have any price details of any tools to help me make comparisons."

"It is a free tool."

"The product's free tier licensing plan is beneficial for individual developers to learn about its functionality."

More Cloudinary pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

15%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Box?

I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us. We did not go to payment and other matters like this.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Box?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Box?

My main use case for Box is storing cloud content on its cloud and managing it as a collaborating platform so that I can store secure files and share through Box. I use it for document management a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudinary?

I did not research Cloudinary's pricing, as I am using it for free. In the free service, it performs well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudinary?

The UI needs improvement because it has become quite messy recently, making it difficult to locate the media library and images. Additionally, the initial setup process is complex due to the numero...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudinary?

I would advise new users to read the documentation thoroughly to understand how to upload and store images effectively. For those using Cloudinary for the first time, be prepared for a learning cur...

See all answers

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Box

Compared 7% of the time

Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs Box

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive for Business vs Box

Compared 5% of the time

ShareFile vs Box

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Box

Compared 4% of the time

More Box Competitors

OpenText Digital Asset Management vs Cloudinary

Compared 33% of the time

Bynder vs Cloudinary

Compared 29% of the time

Arc XP Experience Platform vs Cloudinary

Compared 23% of the time

More Cloudinary Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Box

June 2026

Download Box product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloudinary

June 2026

Download Cloudinary product report

Overview

Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.

Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.

What are the key features of Box?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface across all devices for efficient file management and collaboration.
Collaboration Tools: Real-time editing and robust tools to enhance teamwork.
Security Options: Strong encryption and customizable permissions to protect content.
Third-party Integration: Seamless integration with apps like Microsoft Office.
File Sharing: Efficient sharing capabilities for both internal and external stakeholders.
Metadata Management: Advanced options for organizing and managing content.

Why do users appreciate using Box?

Productivity Boost: Reduces time and effort needed for document access and collaboration.
Secure Environment: Ensures data safety through strong security measures.
Improved Workflow: Facilitates smoother operations and collaboration across teams.
Mobility: Supports remote work with easy access to files on the move.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.

Box

Cloudinary provides a comprehensive API for image transformation, offering easy integration and a user-friendly interface. With automated asset optimization and robust media management, it enables seamless image storage and retrieval, making it a preferred choice for websites and applications.

Cloudinary is a leading platform in image management, featuring tools for image transformation, storage, and hosting. Its user-centric design simplifies processes like automated image optimization and media validation. Users benefit from a versatile CDN and a generous free tier, facilitating efficient development and deployment. The ability to handle image uploads and retrievals without complex configurations aids in quick time to market, while intuitive search and manageable media organization enhance user experience. Despite its strengths, users call for improvements in user-friendliness, API functionality, and clearer documentation. Pricing remains a concern, and additional advanced AI capabilities for image generation are desired. There's interest in better video hosting and integration with existing storage solutions.

What features does Cloudinary offer?

API for Image Transformation: Offers broad capabilities for customizing images.
Automated Asset Optimization: Ensures images are delivered in optimal formats.
Media Validation: Verifies media integrity and quality.
Intuitive Search: Allows easy retrieval of media assets.
CDN Power: Boosts content delivery speed globally.

What benefits do users find in Cloudinary?

Seamless Development: Facilitates quick development and deployment.
Efficient Image Management: Simplifies image storage and retrieval.
User-Friendly Interface: Aids in easy platform navigation.
Time-Saving Processes: Reduces time in image handling and delivery.

Cloudinary finds applications across sectors such as e-commerce, where image optimization for different devices significantly enhances user experience. In the web and app development fields, it enables automated management of image sizes and formats, supporting functions like user uploads and profile picture handling. Organizations utilize its media management capabilities for storing and handling documents, videos, and other assets. The API integration streamlines backend operations, making it an appealing choice for developers in diverse industries.

Cloudinary

Sample Customers

GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Box vs. Cloudinary

June 2026

Free Report: Box vs. Cloudinary

Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. Cloudinary and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Box vs. Cloudinary report.

See our list of best Digital Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.