Brinqa vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Brinqa and Qualys are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Brinqa is ranked #59, while Qualys is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.9. Brinqa holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Qualys’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Brinqa users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Brinqa

Read 1 Brinqa review

1,221 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

4,977 Views
1,841 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Brinqa

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Brinqa and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management compete in the cybersecurity asset management space, focusing on asset visibility and security controls. Qualys may have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, offering benefits that many find worth the investment.

Features: Brinqa is recognized for integration capabilities, risk prioritization, and a unified interface for threat intelligence. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management shines with comprehensive asset discovery, vulnerability management, and extensive reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Brinqa offers straightforward deployment with proactive support, ensuring effective implementation. Qualys provides advanced customization options, requiring more resources but backed by strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Brinqa provides competitive pricing with a quick return on investment through simplified integrations and efficient operations. Qualys may involve higher setup costs, offering robust ROI through thorough security management and protection features.

To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Brinqa

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

59th

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

50th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (45th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (19th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

10th

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Brinqa is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	1.4%
Brinqa	0.5%
Other	98.1%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Remo Belisari

Cybersecurity Director at RB Consultancy

Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs

I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features to cover our entire attack surface."

"I appreciate the feature that simplifies cloud security posture, offering insights into vulnerabilities, and reducing the complexity of managing the security program."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides accurate content that identifies all the endpoints, making it better in that way, and the review results for finding vulnerabilities and reporting also show that it identifies most of them, helping us complete tasks in 3.5 days instead of five."

"What I appreciate most about Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is the inventory feature, where I can look up assets, software, applications, open ports, and similar items because it's very useful."

"The best feature is asset discovery through their cloud agent or IP-based scanning."

"When you implement a dynamic tag using a query, you do not need to manually tag all the servers. It categorizes all the servers that come under that query. The tagging part is automatically done within a few minutes. It reduces the effort."

"I would rate the Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten for its overall performance."

"The fact that it is integrated makes it very easy to understand."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."

"One improvement that they can make in the EASM module is the scan frequency. After EASM is configured the first time, it allows you to do the complete configuration, but if you want to reconfigure it, it will not ask or provide any option for scan frequency. For that, you need to raise a case with Qualys and talk to the Qualys team."

"Integration of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, particularly with ServiceNow, takes a very long time, and it needs prioritization of patch rules based on vulnerability risk."

"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."

"One downside of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is that I would prefer to see a more interactive dashboard."

"The scanning function could be improved."

"We have had challenges modifying the agent configuration. Particularly, when we want to change the tenant that the agent is pointing to, we have had difficulties making that reliable and working properly."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Brinqa

Compared 12% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Brinqa

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Brinqa

Compared 9% of the time

Unified Vulnerability Management vs Brinqa

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Brinqa

Compared 7% of the time

More Brinqa Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Brinqa product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Brinqa specializes in providing a comprehensive approach to cyber risk management for businesses. It integrates data from multiple sources to deliver risk insights tailored to help prioritize and address vulnerabilities effectively.

Focused on understanding and managing cyber risks, Brinqa integrates seamlessly into existing IT frameworks, offering a scalable and customizable platform. By correlating data, it delivers valuable insights into potential vulnerabilities and threats, helping prioritize actions and optimize security measures. Its framework enables predictive risk assessment, fostering a proactive approach in security strategy. With actionable intelligence, it supports robust decision-making to mitigate cyber threats efficiently.

What are Brinqa's Key Features?

Data Integration: Collates data from diverse sources to offer a unified view of risk.
Risk Prioritization: Uses machine learning to highlight critical issues.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides dynamic dashboards for tailored insights.
Automated Reporting: Facilitates comprehensive reporting for compliance.
Predictive Analytics: Offers anticipative evaluations of potential risk factors.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Improved Security Posture: Users can effectively focus on critical threats.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines risk management processes, saving time.
Cost Effectiveness: Optimizes resource allocation, reducing wasted investment.
Enhanced Compliance: Simplifies regulatory adherence with detailed reports.

In healthcare, Brinqa helps protect patient information by continuously monitoring network vulnerabilities. In financial services, its real-time insights help safeguard sensitive transactional data. For energy sectors, it ensures infrastructure security, critically assessing and mitigating risks associated with operational technology.

Brinqa

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.